MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Gone: Mass Extinction and the Hazards of Earth's Vanishing Biodiversity

Page 4 of 7


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

RE:ACTION

Weather permitting, the sub dives each morning carrying two researchers who spend the day in near-fetal positions, staring out portholes the size of grapefruit and breathing recirculated air infused with the smell of dirty socks. While the researchers work their task lists, the pilot manipulates Alvin's robotic arms, biopsying holes in the ocean bottom and collecting mud from around the seeps. Seven hours from launch, tired and dehydrated, all three aquanauts return to the surface looking a decade older.

Lisa Levin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography is one of the foremost experts on these strange chemical worlds, and is chief scientist for one of the two research teams sharing the cruise. Her group is composed of 12 marine biologists and biogeochemists collaborating on a study of seep ecology and evolution. Petite, in jeans and Converse sneakers, Levin leans forward in pursuit of perpetual questions, then leans back to issue commands. Most of the time she just moves—fast and quiet, mud-spattered, clipboards in hand. She doesn't say much, maybe the result of working the deepwater for 27 years, making more than 70 dives into a quiet world no humans have words for.

She loves the bottom. It's possible to read mud, she says. I picture her peering out Alvin's porthole and tracking the infinitesimal movements of clams and sea stars.

We're sitting in Atlantis' library, a room familiar from many a Robert Ballard National Geographic documentary. It's six days into a three-week cruise, and her team is holding a heated powwow on mud allocation. Levin's job is peacemaker, and she tries hard to satisfy a grumpy biogeochemist who spends many hours alone in a radioisotope lab in a shipping container on a weather deck and wants more tube cores and fewer bio boxes to come up from the bottom. The other principal investigators seem willing to compromise, but to no avail.

Typical of my position on this cruise, I sit in a no man's land—in this case beside the accordion wall separating the library from the mess deck. Willingly or not, I can also monitor the conversation on the other side from a bunch of off-duty seamen swearing colorfully about their right to smoke cigarettes. They have lately been curtailed by smoke-sensitive scientists.

Levin's group is studying bristleworms, in particular why so many from the family Dorvilleidae inhabit these seeps (17 species so far, including 10 in one genus). Dorvilleid worms appear to be the underwater equivalent of the Galápagos finches that proved seminal in Charles Darwin's thinking on evolution. All 14 species of finches currently inhabiting the Galápagos radiated from a handful of ancestors blown to sea from South America, making landfall on the largely birdless islands, there to evolve into new species more like blackbirds, wrens, grosbeaks, woodpeckers, and mockingbirds than finches.

Having likewise arrived at the "islands" of underwater seeps and whale falls, the dorvilleid worms build ephemeral communities lasting as long as fuel is available. Like Darwin's finches, these worms are rapid responders, filling empty niches in no time at all, evolutionarily speaking, with fully functioning communities. They are also living examples of the kind of speciations that follow on the heels of mass extinctions.

Listening to the simultaneous griping and negotiating in the library and mess deck, it occurs to me that our floating community of 51 souls aboard Atlantis illustrates the divergent human impulses between competition and cooperation that will, in the near future, seal the fate of all Earth's species—counted, uncounted, ancient, and newborn.

within days of boarding atlantis I'm learning to sort worms. Until today, the seas have been calm enough that staring at tiny living creatures magnified 12 or 50 times in petri dishes full of deoxygenated water has been a hypnotic, through-the-rabbit-hole exercise: foraminiferans like frosted Christmas-tree ornaments, spaghetti worms like exploded dissections gone bad, snails wearing circa-1960 bathing caps with bobbing bacterial filaments, all amid a snow-globe blizzard of gold, mica, and dragonfly-iridescent flakes. We work with paper-thin forceps and glass pipettes, yet these creatures are so delicate that many disintegrate when touched.

The seas have kicked up today, and some of the researchers normally glued to stools along the microscope bar have retired to ride out the bad weather in their bunks. Through my looking glass, the mud world in the petri dish reels from mini-tsunamis, worms flailing, snails spinning in shells, amphipods sprinting on swimmerets, bacterial filaments tying themselves into knots. It's a stomach-churning chaos presumably unknown in their deepwater home.

The truth is, I'm beginning to have qualms. I feel sorry for the worms, some of which, I keep remembering, might be more than 170 years old. My doubts crystallize when Ken Halanych, a marine biologist from Auburn University, tells me I have to dissect the worms out of the tubes they've built, and not just collect the ones floating free. This is all part of the sorting business, of course, seeing who lives where, correlating it with gas measurements of the mud layers they inhabit, quantifying the ecosystem, and searching for new species. Halanych is my friend at the dissecting scope, one of the only scientists, in fact, who seems enthusiastic about the hours I spend there and willing to teach me. But I can't do it.

Even though all these worms brought up from the bottom are destined to die anyway, to sacrifice themselves for science, as the grad students weakly joke, I still can't bring myself to yank them from their glovelike tubes. So I leave the dissecting scope and return to my mindless tasks of labeling Nalgene sample bottles, dubbing the Alvin's dive tapes, assembling tube cores for collecting mud.

Later, I overhear Victoria Orphan, a serene geobiologist from the California Institute of Technology and chief scientist of the other team aboard Atlantis, confess her own squeamishness about worm dissections. Maybe because of this, her chosen work is with the methane-eating bacteria and archaea that fuel the gas-powered food web at the seep. She observes these single-celled creatures through chemistry alone, death throes mercifully invisible.

Orphan's study addresses a pressing issue in the biodiversity crisis. In past warming eras, vast undersea deposits of methane ice may have melted, burping gas into the atmosphere and accelerating global warming. Some scientists theorize that a methane burp precipitated or at least contributed to the Permian-Triassic extinction event approximately 251 million years ago, killing 90 percent of all marine life, and 50 to 70 percent of all terrestrial life.

The fact that little methane seeping from the seafloor today ends up a greenhouse gas is because it's consumed on the bottom by the microorganisms around cold seeps, at least in part. In other words, Orphan's single-celled bacteria and archaea keep our world livable to some extent, and maybe to a critical extent in the years ahead—a reminder of the power of the meek, including the unknown power of the undiscovered meek, all 10 to 100 million species of them.

For a while, I switch to Orphan's lab—younger, noisier, more crowded, and less reverent. The students on her team name their tube cores for rappers and discuss the quantity of bling in their mud. They are powerfully, almost alarmingly, focused on their work, barely breaking to take note of schools of dolphins on our bow, humpback whales, soaring albatross—which they refer to, wistfully or dismissively, as charismatic megafauna.

I wonder if anywhere along their educational route they are encouraged to consider science's own footprint. The cold seeps we're visiting are frequented by teams from all over the world. Every submersible drops its ballast before ascending to the surface, and popular dive sites are slowly but surely being paved with metal brick weights. When I mention this, I'm told the metal will rust away in the seawater. When I point out that the seeps are anoxic environments, nearly devoid of rust-inducing oxygen, they blink. Like Mount Everest, Hydrate Ridge is littered with the refuse of exploration.

A week later, at Eel River Seeps off California, Alvin brings up big slabs of rock punctured with deep, perfectly round holes. The two returned scientists tell me of scores of holes as far as they could see down there. Everyone is excited by the doughnut rocks. There's speculation about bubbling methane "chimneys." Yet somehow the holes look familiar to me. They remind me of the tube cores I spend nights reassembling for the next day's dive. I walk to my station and return with a tube core and plug it into a doughnut hole. It's a perfect fit—with this hole, and that hole, and the next one. It fills all the holes I see and test as impeccably as a cookie cutter.

Only Anand Patel, a grad student on Levin's team, seems interested in this; the other scientists studiously avoid it. Since tube cores can sample soft sediments, not hard rock, Patel and I speculate the process of biopsying might prompt a reaction that turns the mud to stone, like scar tissue. He's interested in the chemistry of it. I'm interested in the possibility that all the scientists who love mud so much may be hastening its demise here.

But who knows? Maybe science's footprint will prove useful eventually. With the whale falls largely gone, perhaps a new life-form will evolve to feed on iron ballast.

Photo: Richard Ross



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

The trouble is, the facts are fascinating enough without Julia Whitty's colourful embroidery. Thousands of science graduates from countries all over the world, living in the USA and elsewhere, will understand the scientific terms easily if they don't trip over the dance troupe in wooden clogs and the bootlike hooves in the first paragraph. Like I often ask myself when reading " National Geographic" - does this writer really want to share her knowledge with a community of scholars, or is she a novelist manqué? In any case, she appears to believe in the theory of evolution, which everyone knows is pretty manqué too. I'm sorry that Ms.Whitty was born too late to be able to study at the King's Academy in Middlesborough, England - one of Tony Blair's new City Academies - where the principal, Nigel McQuoid, has said of Darwin's theory "if relativist philosophy is acceptable, then sadomasochism, bestiality and self-abuse are to be considered as wholesome activities." ("Red Pepper")In case he should be misunderstood, he also clarified " "the Bible states clearly that homosexuality is against God's design; I would indicate that clearly to young folk." White rhinos obviously took up too much space on the Ark, trampled the shrubbery in the Garden of Eden -and are too horny in any case. Even if they would find self-abuse difficult, they just have to go - it's God's will, don't you see?
Posted by:George WrightMay 28, 2007 5:45:13 AMRespond ^
I appreciate Julia Whitty's care for the species,which as I know happens to include our own. By my way of interpretation, the literature placed here with her name given as the author is intended to be a discussion on species at risk of disappearing from the planet. This has no bearring on "personal" religious views in my opinion, and I certainly am not here reading about species extinction issues so that I can read about one man's religious preferential opinions and/or beliefs. Julia Whittley's article has substance. I found it very enlightening and interesting, and important.
Posted by:Kathleen O'LaneJune 11, 2007 9:21:28 PMRespond ^
um the informative core of the article should shake everyone to their bones and get you up, the survival of our world not some philosophy is at stake
Posted by:gregJune 13, 2007 2:34:10 PMRespond ^
The same rampant unsustainable development that may lead to mass extinctions of plants and animals also seems to be consigning indigenous peoples of the world to oblivion as indigenous lands are taken, and habitat destroyed. When will we read articles about this holocaust?
Posted by:JonJune 15, 2007 2:54:40 PMRespond ^
but by the end I found myself not caring. The article is too long, too stylized, and to built on self-methaninating predispositions towards journalistic "fluff". At page 5 I stopped reading, by page 6 I stopped caring.
Posted by:it started out okayJune 17, 2007 10:17:40 AMRespond ^
This article is very interesting, although it fails to address the personal responsibility of each and every person to protect their environment. The Border fence is going to kill species and make people ingenious as they are, simply dig underneath it to come to the US. I want more practical solutions to this problem. What can I do? Who can I bother? What can we do as voters, as parents, as teachers, and as environmentalists? The cooperative wildlife preservation project is a great idea. The rapid discovery of new species is very encouraging, I just hope they don't all die before our children learn about them.
Posted by:Stephanie AppiahJune 22, 2007 7:40:55 AMRespond ^
Things have been cooling on Gaia for the last eight years or so. Solar scientists expect a little ice age around 2020. Suppose global cooling starts to kill off species? What should be done about it? Burn more coal?
Posted by:M. SimonJune 28, 2007 8:30:45 AMRespond ^
I tend to agree with your concept, & appreciate your(somewhat courageous) position...but if you really do believe in your theory, why do nyou 'lean' on ANY POLITICAL, GOVERNMENTAL, or POPULUS position...they are ALL of a combination of single sided small minds that can only think/learn/observe/discuss/examine/comprehend, one item at a time, thereby voiding the 'GLOBAL "BIG" PICTURE'...'think outside the bun'...ct
Posted by:IrishKid3July 2, 2007 12:57:30 AMRespond ^
So you believe that halfo ft he worlds animals are definently going to die out?
Posted by:JaySeptember 1, 2007 8:49:18 AMRespond ^
If you dislike informative prose on the grounds that it is also poetic and well-crafted literature, maybe you should stop reading Mother Jones and stick to statistics/ scientific journals (they may be dry enough to satisfy your tastes) p.s. what's with the religious rant? you appear to have vastly missed the relevant points.
Posted by:sarahOctober 2, 2007 8:29:20 AMRespond ^
I've yet to find a source for the claim that "half" of all species may be extinct by the end of the century. Not to diminish the implications here, or to be trite, but I've continually found the numbers 15-37%. Not sure if "half" can be considered "a FACT widely accepted by biologists..."
Posted by:ryanOctober 19, 2007 10:56:46 AMRespond ^
ryan: yes, I've seen the same Numbers you have and they refer to the LAST century (ending in 2000)- and turned out to be accurate in retrospect. The "Half" bandied about refers to the continuation of that rate for the next 90 years; check out the World Conservation Union at http://www.iucn.org/ .
Posted by:tre4October 20, 2007 12:12:33 PMRespond ^
Julia Whitty has done an amazing job of writing this article. She isn't just quoting statistics; she's writing from her soul. George: realizing that something is God's will doesn't make incorrect things correct. The holocaust would be attributed to God's will too, right? Does that make it acceptable? The idea is to do your best and leave the rest to God.
Posted by:omer idreesNovember 7, 2007 9:08:28 PMRespond ^
Get to the point, please.
Posted by:Tom OverFebruary 13, 2008 5:27:40 PMRespond ^
Put it all on one page so i can read it!
Posted by:wjioaviuaweiotaeApril 11, 2008 12:43:42 PMRespond ^
I'd rather listen to a white rhino than a george wright any day of the week
Posted by:tbApril 21, 2008 1:55:15 PMRespond ^
the world is gonna end on 06/05/08
Posted by:godMay 14, 2008 11:07:55 AMRespond ^
It didn't.
Posted by:JRAugust 21, 2008 10:54:16 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















Wage Insurance

McCain's Speech

Quote of the Day

Calm Down


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS