MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Talk to Me Like My Father: Frontline Medicine in Afghanistan

Page 3 of 7


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

Soldiers may not be fed if they are unarmed—though neither are they permitted entry if they are carrying a bag of any sort. I ask a soldier waiting in line with me for breakfast why this is. "In case a Taliban in disguise," he nods toward one of the Jordanians, "wants to blow us up." He suggests I stuff my camera bag in a jacket pocket. In line ahead of us is an American private from the perpetually deployed 10th Mountain Division carrying an M203 grenade launcher; in front of him the Jordanians stand in jungle-green fatigues, AK-47s slung casually over their shoulders, magazines jutting from their pockets.

The Romanians, who help provide airfield security, have quickly acquired a reputation for both aggressive patrolling and a certain erratic quality to their response times. Opinions vary over which characteristic predominates. Again and again, I try and fail to engage Romanian soldiers in conversation, but they keep to themselves. They've built a little church that appears to have been lifted whole from the shore of the Black Sea. On New Year's Day, Romania joined the European Union, and their presence in Kandahar can be explained both by the application to join and the expectation that it would be accepted. Everyone comments on how much the Romanians eat—great, heaping mounds of chicken and potatoes and steaks stacked like flapjacks. Still, their comparatively gaunt faces seem half the size of their corn-fed brethren, dark eyes under shaven heads gazing around at such foreignness. And all the food you can eat.

i am standing at the memorial to the 43 dead Canadian soldiers when the first rocket flies into the camp. A granite slab with Captain Nichola Goddard's picture etched into it smiles out from among the others. She was an artillery officer from Shilo, my old regiment, working as a forward observation officer (who directs the fall of artillery shells) when she was killed by a rocket-propelled grenade (rpg). Orthopedic surgeon Steve Masseours—we'd both been captains in Ottawa a dozen years earlier—is standing beside me. He's a major now, and was on duty when Goddard came into the hospital, in May 2006. "She had terrible luck," he says. "Fragment of shrapnel flew in under her helmet, over her armor, at just the wrong angle, and went into her head." She was the first female Canadian soldier killed in action in Afghanistan. Twenty-six years old. Horsey, good-natured grin. Almost beautiful. Beautiful, in fact. "We started to resuscitate her, but it was pretty clear it was hopeless," Steve says.

Just then, a rocket whistles overhead, a short, thin stream of red light trailing behind it. Steve is already ducking low when it explodes in the military police compound, a hundred yards away. A fraction of a second later, another. As the attack siren goes off, we lie on the concrete pad among the pictures of the fallen—smiling, large-toothed men and one woman self-conscious in their posed portraits; the common elements: shoulders and acne. After a few minutes, we scurry over to the nearest bunker, joined by a nervous clot of newbie soldiers from Canada and Holland, and Americans, who do 12- to 15-month tours and were long ago inured to such attacks. "That's the helicopters going up," one lanky Texan says, to the thumping sound filling the air. When it is next possible to be heard, he adds, "Give them 30, 45 minutes and y'all can go back to work." The Texan describes how the rockets are triggered when a block of ice holding down the release lever melts—leaving the Taliban time to get many miles away before the helicopters find the launch site. I nod more times than is necessary. He is entertained. The all-clear signal rings out and we walk quickly to the hospital. There is only one wounded—an American MP who was picked up and tossed by the explosion.

A little later, we eat with Major Sanjay Acharya, an anesthetist of Gujarati stock by way of Newfoundland who speaks with the rolling lilt of that island, almost Irish in its gregarious musicality. "What this represents, gentlemen," he declares, indicating the salmon on his plate, "is creeping mediocrity." Island peoples have high standards for fish, but Acharya also allows he's rattled by the rocket attack. "Bastards are probably off giggling like it's some fucking game of Knock Knock Ginger."

At home, in Ottawa, Acharya keeps workaholic hours—more than 120 on-call nights a year in critical care and anesthesia. Here, he sleeps heroically when the wounded are not coming. When upright, he lays out his plans: to start a cult modeled on Scientology—"I've already got that Eastern mystic-yogi-guru thing down"—to attend law school, to leave the military as soon as he's eligible for his pension. In an organization committed to the cultivation of zeal, he has proved barren land. He tells us he once dodged a court-martial (he had irritated his superior into apoplexy) by simply failing to cooperate, give a statement, or use the military-appointed lawyer. The functionaries, it is plain, would only ever be baffled by him. The nameplate on his room reads, "G. Assman."

by valentine's day spring is unfolding; this is pleasant, in that the rain has stopped and one can sit in the sun and read, but it causes some foreboding. Musa Qala, about 100 miles northwest of Kandahar in Helmand Province, has recently been seized by Taliban forces in defiance of a mutual-withdrawal agreement made earlier with the British. Today the British killed the Taliban commander with an aerial strike. Helmand looks to be this year's hot spot, where the British have just launched Operation Kryptonite, aimed at seizing control of Kajaki Dam, a major power source that has been off-line since 2003. There have been hundreds of Taliban casualties in the previous six weeks—a fact we can learn from Google News. But the bed censuses at the coalition hospitals tell the story just as well: The British-run Camp Bastion field hospital in Helmand is constantly in condition red, and the overflow casualties are coming to us.

Photographs By: Kevin Patterson



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

I think you really missed by not posting the picture of the wounded child shown in your hard copy. I think better than the one you did use, if you could use only one. For what it is worthy.
Posted by:Robert PerkinsJuly 27, 2007 4:39:07 PMRespond ^
Thank you for this beautiful, in its bittersweet way, article. You show the humanity of all those involved and the complexity of the situation. May the day soon come when there is peace in that country.
Posted by:An American CanadianJuly 27, 2007 6:22:11 PMRespond ^
Beautifully told account of a war that is hardly covered in what our US media calls "the news," and is mostly the latest breathless goings-on of celebrities. I'm going to forward this to lots of friends as eager as I am for real news. Thanks to Kevin Patterson for writing it; thanks to Mother Jones for running all seven pages.
Posted by:Anne McGravieJuly 28, 2007 12:34:52 AMRespond ^
I think this article should be removed. How awful to read about the death of your son and what the Doctors did to him on the operating table in great detail. What the Mother and Father must be going through . Its horrible enough to loss a son over there. They do not need the details of the operating room.
Posted by:A Nova ScotinJuly 29, 2007 3:43:56 AMRespond ^
hoping for the best care of our troops. Dr.Q
Posted by:Dr.QJuly 30, 2007 10:21:39 AMRespond ^
The name of the wounded soldier and the graphic details of his medical treatment should be removed immediately. This is a flagrant violation of patient confidentiality and medical ethics. I will write directly to Dr. Patterson regarding this.
Posted by:R. Brisebois, MDJuly 30, 2007 11:23:15 AMRespond ^
please remove the article on kevin megeney. the tragedy of his death hurt family enough. those details of his death does not help our grieving process.
Posted by:pictou county girlJuly 31, 2007 9:41:26 AMRespond ^
I must say that I understand why you have done what you have done here. Of course it is your job to sell papers but have you even taken into account the family of Kevin Megeney or indeed the officers and soldiers of his unit? It has been an extremely tough time dealing with the death of such a great young person. A person who so willinging volunteered for this job to protect the values that we hold dear. I ask that you take this into account and remove such details from your article so that we can continue with our healing process!
Posted by:A Nova Scotian OfficerJuly 31, 2007 3:35:57 PMRespond ^
When I read this article I was completely shocked, I can't believe these graphic details r made public. Kevin's family is suffering enough, they don't need this!! My niece is Kevins niece and a 16 yr old can get into these articles pretty easy, please remove it!!
Posted by:Donna from Pictou CountyAugust 1, 2007 6:40:30 AMRespond ^
My heart goes out to the Megeney Family. Having to deal with the death of a loved one is hard under any circumstance, but having read the horrific details is reliving the death all over again. DDid you consider the family when you wrote this?
Posted by:Nova Scotian GirlAugust 2, 2007 4:53:12 AMRespond ^
PATTERSON: You're nothing more than a crude, insensative bastard. You have a Nice Day,too ! Greg
Posted by:Greg, Family FriendAugust 2, 2007 5:29:40 AMRespond ^
My heart goes out to the Megeney Family. Having to deal with the death of a loved one is hard under any circumstance, but having read the horrific details is reliving the death all over again. DDid you consider the family when you wrote this?
Posted by:Nova Scotian GirlAugust 2, 2007 8:08:36 AMRespond ^
Did you know before this article was published that NO ONE in Cpl. Kevin Megeney's family was aware that this article was being published?? How irresponsible of you as a "news organization" to do such a thing. Do you not investigate such things before you publish?? I also hope this doctor is dealt with at the highest level. I am not a doctor but I know about patient-doctor confidentiality. I hope his license is taken away for ever and that the family sues him for everything he has or ever will have. I have never read your publication before today and trust me...never will again. I will also encourage others to do the same. Shame on you...I hope you get sued too. Disgusted. Ed MacIntosh
Posted by:Ed MacIntoshAugust 2, 2007 9:17:41 AMRespond ^
I cannot believe people feel the need to print this tragic yet graphic story again and again, The family must be heartbroken, and thus feeling very betrayed, and to think all the while this sits in print someone is making money off it. Being ex- military nothing surprises me anymore. God Bless
Posted by:Pictou County UpsetAugust 2, 2007 10:42:51 AMRespond ^
As the co-editor of Mother Jones, I would like to make a few things clear in regards to the part of this story that involves Cpl. Kevin Megeney. First, we sent a letter to Cpl. Megeney's parents, uncle, and sisters, ahead of publication, informing them that this 7,000 word diary of a doctor's month of service at Kandahar Air Field did contain a scene involving the tragic death of their son. That it was written by a doctor present when Cpl. Megeney was brought in for emergency surgery, and that it would likely be disturbing to those close to him. We offered to send it to them or any intermediary they would like if they thought it would be too disturbing to read it themselves. I then spoke with Mrs. Megeney by phone at length. She assured me that the family would like to see the article, and that she was a nurse and would read it before any other members of her family; she said it would help to have closure to know more about what happened. We heard from other members of the family who also wanted to read it, and some whom after they did expressed the desire to write to Dr. Patterson "to express my appreciation to him for exhausting every effort to save [him]." They asked that we link to Cpl. Megeney's memorial site, which we were already planning on doing, so our readers would have a chance to express their condolences. As to the question of anonymity: The death of Cpl. Megeney was an extremely well covered story in Canada. There was no way to write about the incident and not have it be instantly clear to any member of his family or any member of the Canadian press, or anyone who'd followed the story who we were talking about simply by omitting his name. So we felt it would be false anonymity at best. Doctors can and do publicly talk about how patients die when the story is already in the news--consider press conferences following tragic accidents. And there was certainly nothing in this account that disparaged Cpl. Megeney, who served his country admirably and died in a tragic accident. This was an extremely emotional story to work on. The account of Cpl. Megeney's death was particularly poignant, but there were many other stories in there of death and injury to soldiers and civilians that are hard to read. But in our opinion for the greater public to live in denial about what happens in a war does a disservice to those soldiers who serve and the civilians who are affected. Clara Jeffery Editor, Mother Jones
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 2, 2007 1:17:14 PMRespond ^
I find it hard to imagine that the Megeney family would be anything but grateful to Dr. Patterson for fighting to save Kevin Megeney's life and writing such a poignant account of the horror of his death. Hard to read? Yes. Although the real tragedy is that these soldiers deaths are so easy to ignore. it isn't pleasant, but we all need to open our eyes and see what is going on in Afghanistan and not forget the sacrifices these young men and women make.
Posted by:Nova Scotian, as wellAugust 2, 2007 6:53:59 PMRespond ^
Hey American Canadian, STAY IN CANADA!!!
Posted by:MaxAugust 3, 2007 1:37:27 AMRespond ^
The sooner the US-led occupation troops get out the better. It's been six years of virtually no aid to Afghanistan (outside of Kabul aka Potemkim city) so even the most die-hard apologist for the Rape of Afghanistan should be able to see that the West has no benign intentions what-so-ever towards this poor blasted land. Withdraw and apologize for destroying yet another defenseless country
Posted by:NoAugust 3, 2007 6:42:07 AMRespond ^
A very moving piece that I am glad was written and read. I'm having a hard time deciding whether or not our soldiers should be in Afghanistan, and I shrivel in horror every time a soldier is killed there. There are so many things that are hard to understand, but I understand the humanity and pity of the author. Thank you for sharing with us.
Posted by:JoyceAugust 3, 2007 9:23:11 AMRespond ^
If honest reporting were the norm, readers would not be so shocked when faced with stories of life and death. As a culture we have dulled our senses into a tele-play stupor. Until we are willing to face the violent truths of our actions, we cannot hope to change them. Bravo for seeing and writing with clarity, the life-seeping violence, the bravery, and the gentle grief of life in a war zone.
Posted by:Simone in Nova ScotiaAugust 3, 2007 9:32:24 AMRespond ^
I have a loved one whom has just left for kandahar yesterday, Although this article is very graphic and detailed and somewhat hard to read, I do have to say that I am happy to know there are doctors and medical staff over there willing to give it there all to try and make sure our soldiers make it home alive.
Posted by:Pictou County NativeAugust 3, 2007 9:41:15 AMRespond ^
to pictou county girl,Jackie in his/her post said it all,with the family and friends comments on Kevins website,how in the world can they ever stop grieving,face it-if everyone down there stopped this talking to the dead,the Family may get what they need,maybe seeing as his Mother is a Nurse,she can realize the damage you are all doing to Her Family. RIP
Posted by:bill ,hopewell N.S.August 3, 2007 10:32:22 AMRespond ^
I was a close friend of Kevins. And am writing from Afghanistan. And to "Jackie" i say how dare you tell a family to get over something so tragic. It isnt something you can get over. First hand experiance tells me that it doesnt take time, and you cant ever accept it. Unitl you come to this country i think you should keep the attempts at controversy to yourself. i have no issue with the article just the mindless [deleted] people like "jackie" will write out of ignorance.
Posted by:John WilliamsAugust 3, 2007 10:57:51 AMRespond ^
Arthur Nova Scotia, that comment was way over the line and I'm going to pull it. Please, everybody, no matter what your feelings are on this article or the war, have some sense of decorum. The family is entitled to grieve in whatever manner works for them. --Clara Jeffery, Editor
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 3, 2007 11:47:25 AMRespond ^
August 3, 2007 Open letter to the Canadian Forces Re: Dr. Kevin Patterson’s article in July/August 2007 Issue of 'Mother Jones' I am writing with regard to the ethical issue of the confidential medical information that Dr. Patterson has shared in a public forum without patient permission. There was a report in today’s New Glasgow 'News' that: “Lt. Cdr. Pierre Babinsky, a legal services spokesperson for the Canadian Forces, said military officials were aware of the article, printed in the magazine Mother Jones when it was published. Babinsky said one of the investigations, conducted by military police, will determine if there were any breaches of protocol regarding information laws.” I contend that even if the investigation shows there was no breach of “information laws” the article written by Dr. Patterson and published in Mother Jones does breach this physician’s code of ethics with regard to patient confidentiality. Some would suggest that Dr. Patterson or the Mother Jones publication should not have used the name of the soldier in question when he wrote a detailed description of the death. This would not have made the article any more acceptable as it is too easy to identify this soldier, as well as any of the others soldiers, about whom he has written. Perhaps the soldiers who are still living gave permission for their stories to be shared by Dr. Patterson in his writings but we know from the family in Stellarton Nova Scotia that they were not asked to give permission for the story of their son’s death to be published. All health care professionals are bound by their particular profession’s code of ethics. All codes of Ethics hold confidentiality as a cornerstone. The details of military personnel injuries and treatments came to Dr. Patterson because he was privileged to be providing care to these patients. That privilege gives him a responsibility to hold this information in confidence and only write about these experiences with the expressed permission of patients or, if they have died, of their next of kin. Not only is this an ethical issue it is a professional practice issue. Dr. Patterson should be reported to his professional college. Sincerely Cathie Watson BN MHSc (Bioethics) RN Pictou County, Nova Scotia cc. Mother Jones The News
Posted by:Cathie WatsonAugust 3, 2007 11:55:41 AMRespond ^
The lack of compassion on the part of Mother Jones is shameless. The point could be made without wanton cruelty. Shame for your war profiteering.
Posted by:Kate MacKayAugust 3, 2007 10:17:12 PMRespond ^
Your story honestly depicts the horror and ugleness of war.But it also depicts the fight Doctors have, to do all they can to help our boys,who become men too soon.Having three sons myself, a loss of anyone of them would be unbearable .But it would have been a little easer to know honestly that all had been done.We sometimes forget the war within a war that the Doctors and medics fight.The horrors honest reporters face when they try to answer and report about the face of war.A lot of them are young people and boys too.Please give them the the same prayers and compassion we give all in that hedious war.Like the fallen Hero reported here ,they too have parents that have read the criticism of this report.A report that was honest .The face of war is washed each day by tears of millions.Harsh judgements could possible one of the seeds that fertilized with chritizems help create the stories we read about.My prayers are with the familys but also with those who see such horror every day and help and go on.Boys yet that may die helping and keeping us informed .
Posted by:Stellarton girlAugust 4, 2007 4:20:30 AMRespond ^
Thank you, Doctor Kevin Patterson, for letting us know a bit about what the military involvement by the Canadian government, the theorists in white shirts in Ottawa, in Afghanistan actually means to the people directly involved - our young men and women.
Posted by:Nancy EatonAugust 4, 2007 5:33:55 AMRespond ^
I doubt the authenticity of this article. As a serving soldier it sounds very Walter Mitty-esque, and certain parts I know for certain to be false.
Posted by:MartynAugust 4, 2007 6:10:43 AMRespond ^
Wonderful and insightful account of the horrors of Canada's involvement in Bush's war.
Posted by:Neil RobertsAugust 4, 2007 6:35:47 AMRespond ^
Martyn: Every article in Mother Jones undergoes rigorous fact-checking. Saying you "doubt its authenticity," while not saying who you are, which unit or army you serve with, nor what specifically you question is a red herring. The facts of Dr. Patterson's article is not in dispute, by the Canadian government, the Megeney family, or anybody else. If you have specific concerns state them and they will be addressed to your satisfaction. Otherwise you engage in anonymous slander and such posts will be removed. --Clara Jeffery, Editor
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 4, 2007 8:39:36 AMRespond ^
Clara Jeffery: Thanks for publishing Kevin Patterson's piece. I found it very moving and informative, and extremely well-written. His treatment of Kevin Megeney's death was appropriate and very respectful of that young soldier. I am a former Canadian daily newspaper reporter and editor. I am now a historian, one of whose specialties is military history (and who was a journalist involved in military matters)and who has personal ties with the Canadian military. As you know, and as I experienced, with stories such as this you often get knee-jerk reactions from readers who claim to speak for "the victim" or "the family." Those reactions I have often thought were quite off-base. Anyway, thanks to you and to Dr. Patterson, who is a very, very good writer.
Posted by:Bob BealAugust 4, 2007 9:05:22 AMRespond ^
The poster 'No' says nothing has been accomplished in Afghanistan. Tell that to the more then 4,000,000 refugees who have returned home; I mean they should have stayed in their tent cities right. Tell that to the millions of children, including young girls, who now have a chance at a better future through education. Tell that to the families of the over 40,000 children who didn't die last year due to the decrease in infant mortality rates; a direct result of the west's intervention. Tell that to all the children who will grow up not having to deal with the scourge of polio due to the immunization programs that we've established. Tell that to the villages that now have clean drinking water. I could keep going on and on but if you need more evidence of the good work that is being done in Afghanistan then maybe you should take some time to educate yourself. Maybe you are you one of 'those people'. You know the kind, they don't think Afghan's are worthy of one Canadian life or maybe you believe that we live in a utopian world were there is no need for men with big guns. If you are then just say it loud and say it proud. For now I will give you the benefit of the doubt here in that you are probably just ignorant of the facts. P.S. Thanks for the article Mother Jones
Posted by:Troy in CanadaAugust 4, 2007 9:25:34 AMRespond ^
Just a question: How come my post keeps reappearing? I didn't do that, as far as I know, and I am not computer-illiterate (but not according to my son, who works for Dell).
Posted by:Bob BealAugust 4, 2007 9:29:59 AMRespond ^
This article tells the truth of one side of war - what injury and death are all about. The editor says that she did check with Megeney's mother and she agreed to the publication of this material. Canadians should know the truth in all its details.
Posted by:Peter Choate, CalgaryAugust 4, 2007 9:32:27 AMRespond ^
Please pull the story of Cpl. Kevin Megeney's death. The family has been through enough already. The event of his death was a tragic event, no one wants to read about it in a news article. RIP Kevin
Posted by:Sarah in Nova ScotiaAugust 4, 2007 9:43:08 AMRespond ^
Bob, I'll get all the double posts taken down. But it's the weekend so that might take awhile. Sorry everybody. Especially if this post appears four times. Also, just hit the submit button once.
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 4, 2007 10:14:43 AMRespond ^
Hi Clara: I do hit the submit button just once. I am not so dumb or inexperienced to do otherwise. Maybe your computer has become infatuated with me and wants to begin some kind of weird relationship. Good luck at handling the comments on the Globe and Mail's board. You are actually getting an easy ride compared to some on those boards. As I have said, I think you did absolutely the right thing, and I will defend you against the naysayers who do not bother to think it through. Best wishes, Bob.
Posted by:Bob BealAugust 4, 2007 10:24:45 AMRespond ^
I have spoke to the family concerning this issue, and once again the media has made a complete mess. They are very appreciative for the efforts the medical team put forth to try and save their family member. The only issue concerning this article was that they would have wanted to see it before it hit the stands. THATS IT!!! They have not asked Mother Jones to pull the article and I see by peoples comments its actually the general public saying to pull the article. Not them. But the media loves to stir the pot, and in this case they did a good job. People on here attacking and criticizing the way they grieve? Why? What does it matter to anyone how the family handles their loss? Is your life going to change any? Did it make you feel good after you made your harsh comments? This is being blown way out of proportion, and is on the verge of ridiculousness. My understanding was that this comment option was for stating your opinion on the article, not whether you agree with the way the family is grieving. I would think Mother Jones staff would agree, although by seeing how they've published comments regardless of content, it almost looks like they are condoning an attack on a grieving family. Which I would hope is not the case. I also tried to access the website moments ago, and I see it is no longer accessible, after reading this comment section, I need not ask why. Mother Jones for your magazine alone, clean up your comment section, people can agree and disagree intelligently without personal attack.
Posted by:Barb from Nova ScotiaAugust 4, 2007 2:55:39 PMRespond ^
Bob I'd explain what causes the multiple posts, but I'm afraid it might encourage some mischievous soul to use that technique inappropriately.
Posted by:ModeratorAugust 4, 2007 3:13:20 PMRespond ^
Insensitive beyond belief. Patterson is a smart ass with no profession ethics and Mother Jones is a profiteering rag. Hope you all read something similar about a member of your own family one day.
Posted by:Greg from BCAugust 4, 2007 3:19:05 PMRespond ^
Clara Jeffery, Mother Jones' Editor here. Thanks Barb from Nova Scotia: I just had the link to Cpl. Megeney's memorial site pulled at the family's request. They were rightfully upset that some people here mocked their private expressions of grief there. We'd originally put it up at their request, because we thought our readers would like to express their condolences. It's really sad that the "Jackies" and the "Irenes" of this world, whose comments have been pulled, have to act so completely inappropriately. We've been having some technical glitches with the comments function, which is why the delay in pulling some comments and why comments were repeating. Also it's always a bit harder to monitor and get things fixed over the weekend, we're a small staff. Everybody's feelings are running high, but I would hope that people who are actual Mother Jones readers at least would behave themselves. If people can't we'll shut down comments entirely.
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 4, 2007 3:23:17 PMRespond ^
Hi moderator: Thanks for your response. I understand your nervousness at supplying specifics. However, I am curious. If you want to tell me, I have a hotmail email account, yeoldepoges at hotmail.com I am very sorry that you have had to remove the link to Kevin Megeney's memorial site. I think that is tragic, and is one of the very unfortunate features of this modern communication called the Internet. I sympathize with all you who have to try to handle this. Please keep up the good journalism that has been a feature of Mother Jones since its inception (which I am old enough to remember). Best wishes, Bob Beal, Edmonton, Alberta.
Posted by:Bob BealAugust 4, 2007 4:00:14 PMRespond ^
I am a Reservist in the Canadian Infantry and I am also a 3rd year medical student; I found this story at times absolutely brilliant, starkly grotesque, depressing, and uplifting....Thank you for giving us a personal account of what it is you have experienced as a medical professional in a war-torn nation and also for volunteering to help those that need help the most, whether it be innocents, opposition fighters or coalition forces. In my opinion, this was an excellent read.
Posted by:Both Sides of the CoinAugust 4, 2007 4:35:28 PMRespond ^
I expect more out of Mother Jones. Sharing this story with the solider's name serves no purpose other than to further the pain suffered by the soldier's friends, family and fellow soldiers. Shame on this publication and its editors.
Posted by:A disappointed readerAugust 4, 2007 5:44:53 PMRespond ^
Martyn: Every article in Mother Jones undergoes rigorous fact-checking. Saying you "doubt its authenticity," while not saying who you are, which unit or army you serve with, nor what specifically you question is a red herring. The facts of Dr. Patterson's article is not in dispute, by the Canadian government, the Megeney family, or anybody else. If you have specific concerns state them and they will be addressed to your satisfaction. Otherwise you engage in anonymous slander and such posts will be removed. --Clara Jeffery, Editor
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 4, 2007 6:09:52 PMRespond ^
Dr. Patterson - Thank you for your efforts to keep our Canadian Soldiers alive in Afghanistan. MoJo - Thank you for bringing the reality of war to light by publishing this article. Canadian Troops - Thank you for all you do. I pray your lives are never put at unnecessary risk or taken in vain. The Megeney Family - I am sorry you have to re-live the pain of the loss of your son. I know you are very proud of him. Kevin - Rest In Peace my friend. I am glad to have known you.
Posted by:Yet Another Nova ScotianAugust 4, 2007 6:10:40 PMRespond ^
Clara Jeffery, Mother Jones' Editor here. Thanks Barb from Nova Scotia: I just had the link to Cpl. Megeney's memorial site pulled at the family's request. They were rightfully upset that some people here mocked their private expressions of grief there. We'd originally put it up at their request, because we thought our readers would like to express their condolences. It's really sad that the "Jackies" and the "Irenes" of this world, whose comments have been pulled, have to act so completely inappropriately. We've been having some technical glitches with the comments function, which is why the delay in pulling some comments and why comments were repeating. Also it's always a bit harder to monitor and get things fixed over the weekend, we're a small staff. Everybody's feelings are running high, but I would hope that people who are actual Mother Jones readers at least would behave themselves. If people can't we'll shut down comments entirely.
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 4, 2007 6:55:32 PMRespond ^
Very immediate, moving, and necessary account. This is what trauma medicine is like. This is what *is* happening to our men and women in war zones. There is no offense here, only truth, and told with respect.
Posted by:Anysia Rusak-MaguireAugust 4, 2007 7:24:18 PMRespond ^
I don't understand why people are so upset over a precise account of military trauma medicine. While using names of patient can be discussed at length I believe that it did add humanity to the story as oppose to using nameless patients. Publishing in journals accounts of medical cases involving patients is what doctors do. Any scientist knows that, just go to PubMed and you will see that it is the norm ( although disclosure of identity varies). It might be unusual for mass media story to be as detailed but people have to stop putting their head in the sand, this is reality, it's painful and not pretty. As for the "graphic" details i don't think it is sensationalism or overdone. I think it is a brilliant account of one's tour of duty, as well as informative on so many levels.
Posted by:A CanadianAugust 4, 2007 7:51:32 PMRespond ^
Responding to Barb's earlier comments, and media reports elsewhere, I'd like to address the timing of our correspondence with the Megeney family. We sent letters out warning them of the article immediately after it was completed, which considerably before the issue appeared in subscribers' mailboxes and certainly on newsstands (which is fairly irrelevant in Nova Scotia and most of Canada, major cities excepted). We took this approach, rather than just sending the issue to them directly, because we wanted to give them the choice whether or not to read the article (as I've discussed in comments above). As it turned out, many members of the Megeney family were gathered in seclusion in a different part of Canada. So in some cases, by the time they got back, there was little time, if any, to get them the story; this was complicated by the issues of international mail (even if expressed), and that some members of the family were not email users (and thus could not be sent electronic version immediately). In retrospect, however, I'm still not sure whether being more aggressive in insisting to send them the article without warning would have been the right call. Everybody hates when the media descends on victims of tragedy, demanding a response. That's what we were trying *not* to do, and we thought we had enough time to avoid such ambush behavoir. So while I wish the circumstances had been otherwise, I'm not sure what we could or should have done otherwise. Surely, that's up for debate. But that's our thought process here.-- Clara Jeffery, co-Editor, Mother Jones
Posted by:Clara JefferyAugust 4, 2007 8:18:48 PMRespond ^
As a physician who works in an operating room, I can assure you that Dr. Patterson's narratives are representative of standard doctors' lounge conversation. In presenting these to the "uninitiated" in your publication, I suppose he is guilty as are most writers of opportunism and careerism. The question of whether he is guilty of impropriety turns on whether permission to print his patient's name was obtained. When lawyers who are also authors publish stories about their clients, they would certainly first obtain this. Ms. Jeffery states that she spoke with Mrs. Megeney by telephone in advance of publication. I would welcome clarification as to whether she obtained this permission.
Posted by:Peter TinitsAugust 4, 2007 9:31:58 PMRespond ^
As a former reserve medic and a current newspaper editor, I found Dr. Patterson's account powerful, well-written and stark -- all the more so because the accounts of medical professionals doing their jobs in brutal conditions are so matter of fact. None of it is easy to read, whether it's a blow-by-blow account of trauma surgery or the grim acceptance that some lives (coalition) will get more attention than others (Afghan) out of practical necessity. Thank you for this look inside your little bit of Kandahar Air Field and the coalition mission. Thanks to Mother Jones for publishing. Godspeed (and safe home) to all who must endure the fighting. Sympathies and deepest gratitude to all those who, like the Megeneys, have given so much.
Posted by:John LundAugust 4, 2007 10:30:43 PMRespond ^
Wow, have all the surgeons publishing all their surgerical procedures on the mudder! jones site. can ya just imagine the law suits? Where is the privacy act???? The people responsible for this outrageous writing account of this horrific tradgety ;of the loss of life of this young soldier, is more than reprehensible, it is down right criminal!!! CAN WE SAY SUE, SUE SUE!!!
Posted by:gail martinAugust 4, 2007 10:39:36 PMRespond ^
Kevin Megeney's death and details of it might provide us with more understanding of what is going on. His death was tragic and happened because he was serving his country, knowing more details of his death does not change this in the least, when I think of Megeney I think he died for his country, completely with honour. Condolences to his family.
Posted by:Zach R.August 4, 2007 11:11:15 PMRespond ^
I cannot believe what I just read.Do you really think that Kevins parents...family...wanted to know what happened that horrible day they lost their son..brother...It was hard enough loosing him. But to have to read about it..I think it should be removed..
Posted by:Regina StewartAugust 4, 2007 11:44:18 PMRespond ^
Thanks for telling it like it is.
Posted by:BGAugust 5, 2007 1:06:15 AMRespond ^
I wasn't being sarcastic... I really appreciate the detailed account of your experience as medical staff in Kandahar.
Posted by:BGAugust 5, 2007 1:07:34 AMRespond ^
Well I read the article because of all the media uproar... A definite eye opener.. Some of the comments are really disapointing but i believe there's also a bit of truth in many of them.. Is it sensationalism?? Somewhat.. Does it help understand the atmosphere, working conditions and stress of being a doctor in Afghanistan? You bet. Is the article self-serving? Of course it is - the only way to get known is to get published.. Is it honest? I think so.. "Reality" isn't always nice. People tend to duck their heads in the sand what it comes to the atrocities of war. I don't think the name of the soldier needed to be in the article, since like the editor said - 'we all know who it is'. It wouldn't have made the article any less poignant. To those who are completely disgusted by this article I have to say - 'Why did you read it if it offended you?' Of course everyone is entitled to an opinion but like anything else in life, if you don't like what your seeing/reading then DON'T READ IT. My deepest sympathies go to the family and friends of all our fallen soldiers. I am a serving member of the Canadian Armed Forces.
Posted by:Mike in OttawaAugust 5, 2007 3:45:04 AMRespond ^
The soldier's name should have been left out. My heart goes out to the family.
Posted by:Ex-Canadian SoldierAugust 5, 2007 5:16:14 AMRespond ^
A story that needed to be told. Are we to censor all news out of Afghanistan, unless it's Tory/CBC spin? It's sad that Cpl. Megeny's family has to read this - but it's even sadder that their son was sent off on this misguided mission in the first place. Hopefully this story will play a part in helping to bring our soldiers home sooner.
Posted by:Paul WarrenAugust 5, 2007 7:16:48 AMRespond ^
Hi, again, Mother Jones: Don't exaggerate the controversy you caused up here in the Great White North. Patterson's piece rated a very well-balanced story in the Metro section of the Halifax Chronicle-Herald. CBC has a short story on its website, mainly a pick-up from the Herald. But a quick website search reveals nothing in the Halifax News, the Toronto Star, the National Post, the Edmonton Journal, or the Vancouver Sun. I don't think the controversy story has any legs. The controversy seems to be mostly on the comment board of the Globe and Mail, and even that has calmed down. The Globe's comment boards can get pretty weird. Don't overreact to them. And, again, thanks to Mother Jones and Kevin Patterson for the excellent journalism.
Posted by:Bob Beal, EdmontonAugust 5, 2007 7:55:27 AMRespond ^
This article moved me to tears. I have three sons who are all young men now. I feel for Kevin's mother,for all his family. I too am quilty of tuning out the news when they talk about the Middle East. I will never look at the news reports with boredem again.
Posted by:Liz Poole, Nova ScotiaAugust 5, 2007 8:24:33 AMRespond ^
I don't know what to think...! In some ways the fact to reveal the name of this canadian soldier who died from a yet not explained rifle shot will force the militaries to act diligently to find what had happenned but , still 4 months later and we don't have any explanations. On the other hand it is terrible thing to name him and describe in a bit senseless way what they did trying to save him!!!
Posted by:Rosaire BlouinAugust 5, 2007 8:55:44 AMRespond ^
kevins mother was consulted before publishing the article, is this the same Dr.Patterson that works the MIR in Wainwright now?
Posted by:PrivateCanadianAugust 5, 2007 8:26:17 PMRespond ^
As a physician, and longtime fan of Kevin Patterson's writing, I found this journalistic piece to be well-written, emotionally-charged, and medically quite shocking. As a Canadian, I feel I have probably been more informed by this account than any journalism that has come out of Canada's military operation Afghanistan in a long time. This type of story is, of course, exactly what we do not see from the mainstream media, but should be privy to as concerned citizens who care what their country is up to. Yet, this is not quite the issue here. The piece would have been equally powerful if names had been changed or omitted, and it seems a shame this was not attended to.
Posted by:Terry WuerzAugust 6, 2007 5:35:18 AMRespond ^
In hopes that the family may see my comment: I commend you for allowing us to share in your son's story. By reading this story, and the account of your son's death, it has renewed my faith in what is being done overseas. Death is not beautiful, and to depict this as a clean "call time of death" would be, in my opinion, an insult to his memory as well as the memory of the hundreds of others who die gruesome and violent deaths. My condolences are with you, and with all the other families who have sacrificed a loved one for the greater good.
Posted by:KatAugust 7, 2007 11:10:28 AMRespond ^
I served as the general surgeon in Kandahar following Dr. Patterson. I have shared my experiences with respect for the privacy of those Afghanis and NATO forces injured in the war. I believe that Dr. Patterson exceeded the bounds that we, as physicians, are obliged to recognize.
Posted by:Robert MulloyAugust 7, 2007 1:38:41 PMRespond ^
The real issue of this story is not that gruesome details of war were divulged, but rather that a soldier and his family's privacy was invaded.For those who need their reading material as graphic as Dr Patterson's to understand that war is a nasty business, Dr Patterson's article would have been just as effective had a replacement name been used and a disclaimer inserted. Hopefully Dr Patterson secured the permission of the soldier's family to disclose his identity. If not, this is a deeply regrettable breach, not only of his own code of ethics as a doctor and quite possibly in his duty to the Department of National defence, but significantly to the privacy of the soldier and his family at a time of exceptional vulnerability. It is disingenuous and self -justifying for Dr Patterson to insist that he was at liberty to identify the soldier in his graphic accounts, as a result of the soldier's name simply being mentioned in previous media reports.A media mention is a very different matter than exposing the intimacies of a person's death.This is no more or less acceptable were he to have used a video camera or photographs to depict this soldier's death. It is equally self serving and disingenuous of Clare Jeffreys to imply that a kind of permission would be achieved by simply submitting a finished article to the family in advance of the publication, a mere few months after their son't tragic death. Giving families or subjects a "heads up" is a very different thing than seeking their permission. She clearly had an insticnt that the description could be disturbing to some of the soldier's family and friends and even after speaking with them, chose to overide their interests to serve her own. The matter of death and grieving deserves the dignity of privacy as spoken to in such documents as the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. Unless there is a true public interest, such as regarding matters of public health, safety or security, in disclosing personal information, these disclosures should involve permission sought and given. This should apply to all media outlets and all media formats.Otherwise,it is nothing but trading in prurient voyeurism for financial gain.
Posted by:Loreena McKennittAugust 7, 2007 8:38:48 PMRespond ^
IN response to Loreena McKennitt... The family gave their full blessing to this and approved the article. Everyone grieves in a different way - not everyone wants to sit in their home and cry at the memory. This family clearly wanted their sons story to be told,and this is how they are grieving.
Posted by:KatAugust 8, 2007 8:00:38 AMRespond ^
"The Slaughter Inbetween" Having read the numerous responses to Dr. Kevin Patterson's graphic account of a soldier's Death in Afganistan it seems to me that the consensus of opinion is that it was a story that needed to be told, without however publishing the soldier's identity. Unfortunately, in doing so it has shifted the focus of debate away from the validity Canadian foreign policy and centered it upon the professional ethics of Dr. Patterson himself as well as the editorial policy of Mother Jones. It may been naive of the publisher to assume that the public would swallow such a bitter pill without complaint. Dr. Pattersons writings deal with people living in extremis. His personalized accounts of sea voyaging, arctic isolation and now Afganistan, are as raw and revealing as the land and sea scapes in which they occur. Whether or not Dr. Patterson volunteered to go to Afganistan as a doctor intent on admimistering care to his former brothers in arms, or as an oppourtunistic author seeking fodder for the cannon of his literary career is beside the point. Undoubtedly he has honestly, albiet graphhically described what he saw and experienced. In speaking out he has naturally exposed himself to criticism. He will be condemned by those who suport the current state of foreign affairs and lauded by those who deplore it. Having placed himself on this lee shore, the best he can do to weather the storm of controversy, is to batten down the hatches, tie in a reef, heave to, and pray that we and the gods grant him a little leeway.
Posted by:C. Wilton Thomaston, ME.August 10, 2007 8:40:35 AMRespond ^
I would like to cut to the chase, if I may. First, I profoundly sympathize with the Megeney Family and their loss. I fully understand that when in "grieving mode", one cannot always give rational and clear-cut decisions on what is ethically best, let alone being able to discern the vultures that are swooping in the background, waiting for the slightest opportunity to gain self-recognition. Sadly, Dr. Kevin Patterson sought the journalistic limelight by taking advantage of one family's grief period and emotional vulnerability, whether having permission or not. I am deeply appalled by the lack of medical professionalism this doctor decided to undertake. As a journalist myself, I'm also surprised by the decision of Mother Jones Journalism to insensitively disseminate Dr. Kevin Patterson's graphic diary accounts, despite the explanatory efforts from Clara Jeffery, co-editor of Mother Jones. I can understand the delicate position Dr. Kevin Patterson's account may have subjugated Mother Jones Journalism into, but these matters should have been weighed before the actual publication.
Posted by:Shan-Lyn ForsytheAugust 11, 2007 1:34:11 PMRespond ^
As a US physician in Afghanistan, I found Dr. Patterson's account accurate and heartfelt. I know that I could not feel the pain and horror that the identification of Cpl. Megeney caused you in Canada are but I did find it did not add anything to the story. In truth, I felt the mention was a very small part of an article that went much further at describing what I see on a daily basis than anything else I have read or seen. I am afraid that many readers may have missed Dr. Patterson's point of the brave Afghan Soldiers who are fighting here. The Afghans are fighting their own war here without many of the resources available to our troops. The Afghan Soldiers cannot be air evac'd to a higher level of care so we are forced to treat them in an austere deployed setting which cannot be anywhere near as modern and complete as the hospitals we train in stateside. It's a battle every day to support our coalition partners with the limited resources a deployed setting allows, but we are doing it. I am so glad to have read an article that at least touches on the bravery of the ANA soldiers. Thank you Mother Jones for describing the unique role of physicians in the Afghan Theater. Thank you Dr. Patterson for volunteering to serve your country in a war zone and for doing your best for both the ISAF and ANA troops.
Posted by:AnonymousAugust 14, 2007 2:03:52 AMRespond ^
What a compassionate, insightful and revealing article! Those who take issue with it should ask themselves whether the details are unacceptable because all such events should never be allowed to happen to any human being, or because they prefer images of war to be as distant and impersonal as a Hollywood movie or a combat video game. The article reminds us that these are our loved ones, our neighbours, and some of them are people who, though of another culture are nevertheless part of this planet we ALL call home -- not two-bit actors who get to go home after a heavy day of filming on a set. Would they find more comfort in the sound-byte reporting of tv news or in the sanitised language favoured by politicians that speaks of "IEDs" instead of "bombs", "collateral damage" instead of "civilian victims", and "casualty" instead of "our loved ones"? If you have a problem with the descriptions in this article, don't take issue with the writer. Start challenging your alleged leaders, who are only leading us further down the path towards more death and destruction. If you love your country, if you truly want to support the troops who have been sent overseas to do the bidding of politicians and corporate bottom feeders who want to line their pockets at the expense of both our soldiers and the people of Afghanistan, then make your voices heard and stop letting them get away with murder.
Posted by:Andria Hill-LehrAugust 14, 2007 4:10:32 PMRespond ^
I no speak well english...but I read all..for me is very difficult to word in english..I am agreed with Miss Loreena McKennitt...and I hope that will there peace in this Country a day.. Elisabetta Piccolo.
Posted by:Piccolo ElisabettaAugust 15, 2007 6:46:33 AMRespond ^
The Canadian government has been alerted to this srticle and has stopped others from revealing what they witness in war. here's a copy of the story from Canadian Press DND-Doctors-Muzzled TOR OUT YYY INDEX:International, Defence, Health DND muzzles civilian MDs after published account of soldier's death OTTAWA - Stung by the publication of a magazine article by one of its doctors that includes the graphic description of the death of a Canadian soldier in Afghanistan, the Department of National Defence has changed its contracts with civilian physicians, the Globe and Mail reports. The department is warning them not to release sensitive information and to respect patient confidentiality. The newspaper says the changes to contract wording were ordered on July 30, coinciding with the appearance in the U.S magazine `Mother Jones' of a memoir by Dr. Kevin Patterson. The B.C. physician described the month he spent working on contract to DND at a coalition military hospital in Kandahar. The article included several passages describing, in excruciating detail, the death on the operating table of Nova Scotia Cpl. Kevin Megeney. Family members and friends have objected to the portrayal as a breach of the doctor's responsibility to keep patient dealings confidential. The department has launched two inquiries into the incident. Lt.-Cmdr. Pierre Babinsky, a DND spokesman on justice issues, insisted the new contract wording was not changed because of the Mother Jones controversy, but conceded they could be seen as being linked. (BN)(Globe and Mail)
Posted by:murray sherriffsAugust 16, 2007 3:12:27 AMRespond ^
Shame on you Dr Patterson (self serving "hey look at what I did Ma" article) Obviously the Military have gone with he "lowest bidder" again). If scruples ever does enter your conscience - I hope you live to a ripe old age. Shame on you.
Posted by:SoldierAugust 16, 2007 3:23:11 AMRespond ^
Shame on you for your details of the death of Cpl Megeny. You had no right to state these medical details and it seems cheap and only used by yourself as a tactic to make your article more glamorous. God help you if that was one of your friends or family members.
Posted by:Cdn SoldierAugust 16, 2007 7:27:07 AMRespond ^
Should be an award winning article. Fabulous!
Posted by:LouiseAugust 16, 2007 11:20:05 AMRespond ^
We should all be so courageous and community oriented to serve our country and humankind in Afghanistan. Both Corporal Megeney and Dr Patterson served with distinction, they both deserve our praise and prayers. This is a story Canadians deserve to hear.
Posted by:canadian officerAugust 16, 2007 2:32:49 PMRespond ^
I think Dr. Patterson's article was an excellent coverage of the real war in Afghanistan. This was not an article full of self congratulations and false hopes. The section regarding Cpl.Kevin Megeney's death was graphic, tragic and utterly true. The immediate family was informed about the article. It is debatable if actual permission was obtained. That aside, I do not know why the description of the last medical interventions of Cpl.Mengeney should cause such outrage. This is an accurate description of what happens in the theatre of war. The magnitude of the loss and sacrifice is real because this happened to someone's son, friend, nephew and brother. If one believes that the imagination is sufficient to accept the horrors of war and then is surprised by the actual brutality and horror of the whole enterprise by this article, then this article has accomplished some good. It has taken the reader one step away from the sanitized killing of TV, and "war" coverage of traditional media and one step closer to the truth - in war, real people, with real families die and there is nothing particularly glorious about it.
Posted by:Niran SabanathanAugust 18, 2007 4:15:02 PMRespond ^
I note in several instances comments referring to "Bush's War' When will these clowns realise this is a NATO effort and we are all in it together and thank God we have avaiable medical expertise regardless where it comes from.
Posted by:Gary DickAugust 20, 2007 5:48:18 PMRespond ^
I knew Kevin Megeney, not well enough to call him a friend, but enough to remember his infectious optimism (even at the worst of times) and a smile that never left his face. This is the first time I've heard what happened from someone who was there. Thank you for bringing your story to those who will never know what it's like.
Posted by:A Canadian SoldierAugust 23, 2007 11:45:18 PMRespond ^
I have done 2 tours of Afghanistan, in the same capacity as Dr. Patterson. I have also appeared on CBC in an interview, after being cleared by Public Affairs to ensure there were no security violoations which would endanger our mission. As a military physician, I am disappointed by this article. It is unfortunate that the importance of an article has superceded the rights of a patient, and a brother-in-arms. Aside from the long list of security violations in the article, I found it self-serving and gratuitous. It shows contempt for the system that Dr. Patterson supposedly supports. Our jobs are not hobbies, our patients are not subjects, and there is no glamour to war and its eventualities. We serve, not to seek attention or fame, but solely because we love Canada. Perhaps Dr. Patterson should have stayed in the military longer to appreciate that.
Posted by:A.Battad MDAugust 25, 2007 11:13:49 AMRespond ^
war is only fun when you are watching from your living room. now people know what war really is. don't try close the curtain. this article describe what war it is. this maybe it is necessary war but still a war. don't hide it. people should know what really is going on.
Posted by:robert millanAugust 25, 2007 2:43:45 PMRespond ^
I think the article, with all of the gory details, was completely acceptable to publish. The world needs to understand the truth about war. I once had a medical directive that stated 'rescuscitate at all costs, by all means necessary.' After caring for my aging and dying parents, I found out what the end of life is really like. People in real life don't die like Ali McGraw in Love Story, or the way they do in made-for-TV movies. I applaud the doctor for his courage in writing the truth.
Posted by:Selena from Los AngelesAugust 25, 2007 6:13:01 PMRespond ^
Today's headline in the Nanaimo Daily News (my local newspaper) reads "Local Doctor faces court martial." As a result of this I went into your website to see what all the fuss was about. Dr Patterson lead a group of doctors to Afghanistan. The account of this friendly-fire death was just a small part of Dr Patterson's article. I think we all owe a debt of gratitude to doctors who have the courage to undertake difficult assignments like this. It's so important to know that war is more than a video game and the war is about real people. Thanks, Dr Patterson, for telling the true story so beautifully. To court martial somebody for telling the truth, however unpleasant, could be counter-productive. Not too many doctors will volunteer for assignments like this is they know there could be reprisals for telling their story. Thanks for telling the story. I was quite aware of the soldier's identity as it is widely known in Canada.
Posted by:Jean MAugust 25, 2007 10:36:26 PMRespond ^
I grew up in the same town as Kevin Patterson and am amused to see that he is the same clueless, smug, self-serving little pratt he was in high school. Yes, the soldier's death was reported in the media, but the family expected that from journalists. Doctors have access to people at their most vulnerable and most of us would be horrified to think that most private medical moments, or those of our loved ones, would be made public in this way. All this could have been avoided by leaving out the soldier's name--even if "people in the know" would have been able to identify him, most of Mother Jones's readers would not. That way, the focus would have remained on the many admittedly valid points in the article.
Posted by:anonymousAugust 26, 2007 9:28:38 PMRespond ^
I felt this article was extremely well written.If the family was consulted as far as releasing the fallen soldirs name,then it was handled and released appropriately.It was actually refreshing to see an all out effort for such emergency situations is actually taking place,even under less then ideal circumstances.
Posted by:Dan PaveyAugust 26, 2007 9:56:06 PMRespond ^
It is a well written account of some of the harsh realities of wars. The use of «a language chiseled with an axe» is more than appropriate and reflects the context. This well understood, gut-reaching language contrasts with the senseless, meaningless,demeaning and disembodied «wooden-tongue/ langue de bois» used by administrators and politicians.
Posted by:DR M.B.August 27, 2007 8:00:29 AMRespond ^
This was a very moving article and I did not consider it distasteful or disrespectful to neither the patients nor the deceaced either, as some have expressed. Very insightful, well written, honest, and respectful I thought.
Posted by:doug tweet, calgary ABAugust 27, 2007 6:53:34 PMRespond ^
Yay, Patterson...you're a real hero. You have such insight into the workings of the Afghan mission. And after only a month inside the wire! Your bravery should be commended. Rocket attacks! Crappy DFAC food! A whole month! Did you have hot water for your shower? Did they run out of latte's at Greenbeans? Did your laptop work the whole time? You are a joke.
Posted by:Canadian OfficerAugust 28, 2007 7:23:31 PMRespond ^
Surgeon , have served in CF reserves as a medical officer , and family originally from Pictou county NS.Theses comments are directed to the family of Cpl. Megeny . Please accept our most heartfelt expression of sympathy on the loss of Cpl. Megenny . Nothing we say can diminish your loss but perhaps provide a measure of comfort . We too lost a son in law to illness several years ago .When his doctor had nothing more to offer clinically , he gave him a copy of "The Water in Between"- a remarkable story of loss and recovery written by Kevin Patterson . I have read Dr Patterson's account of his time in Afghanistan .He is clearly a very talented writer .The accounts of Cpl Megenny's treatment while graphic do illustrate the extraordinary measures that were taken to try ressucitate him from a fatal wound .This account in no way diminishes Cpl Megeny's service to his country . All Canadian's of whatever political belief or support for the war should remain thankful that there are young Canadians who are willing to answer the call to go into harms way whether they are soldiers or doctors or for that matter scribes .
Posted by:A D ThompsonAugust 29, 2007 1:59:56 PMRespond ^
Hey! What about Angelina's trip to Iraq. Maybe you can do a feature (or first person account.) After this, we need a more frivolous slant.
Posted by:Al LadinAugust 29, 2007 2:05:33 PMRespond ^
As a long in the tooth member of the Canadian Forces (33 yrs) I fail to see what the fuss is about. Are there people so obtuse that think when we die, a mythical Valkrie comes down to tap us on the shoulder and then we ride up with them to Valhalla? Get real! The nature of our jobs is such that we carry and/or work with a variety of things that go bang in a spectacular way. When they do, the results are seldom pretty. Patterson's very serious attempts to save the Cpl were what he was there to do. Sounds like he did a good job. Trauma medicine is rarely pretty but its weird that people seem to have such problems dealing with it - and tough - its trying to save a life which is going fast. If it was me on the table I'd want 'em doing whatever they had to to keep me alive and if that means "openig the hood", then go for it. It would appear that the only issue wa whether Patterson broke confidentiality protocols by publishing the story and again, if MoJo got the families permission first then it would seem that somebody spoke for the Cpl, - his mother, I'm amazed that there are people who have the audacity to try to override that permisson. MoJo got permission from Cpl Megeney's to run the article - why does someone think they need the whole friggin, County to agree before running it? Moreover, if his mother welcomed it then the others (yes even in the family) don't count. A proud and cheerful young man died in a far off place trying to stop bearded savages from hanging young girls from goal posts as punishment for going to school. It is a far better reason than driving drunk which happens a lot more. - Those who knew him, worked with him and served with him should honor his life and his memory - his family will never "get over his death" because it doesn't happen that way. Just as there are still holes in peoples lives from WW II there will always be a hole left here too. Good article, good writing, good information. And for Cpl. Kevin Megeney - Stand down, soldier - rest easy and God bless.
Posted by:Doug MAugust 29, 2007 2:09:05 PMRespond ^
Thank you. Canadians need to know the realities. I felt the tone and words were compassionate, showing us, telling us that war is more than MASH!
Posted by:a fellow CanadianAugust 30, 2007 2:13:48 PMRespond ^
Obviously, this jerk Patterson cares more about all the attention he is receiving for writing such an intrusive article. I don't think he gives a hoot about all who are affected such as the family and friends of Kevin. I trust that this article will be here for some time before it is removed. If not for the hits it is receiving, then to heighten Patterson's ego! You won't get an ego boost from me, Patterson. You and the individuals responsible for this article remaining here are insensitive idiots (and that's being nice)! Oh, here's an ego boost for you: you are a failure for not being able to save the life of Kevin Megeney. How does that grab ya'?? :D
Posted by:One With CompassionAugust 30, 2007 7:08:46 PMRespond ^
Ms. Jeffery: You may have contacted Cpl. Megeney's family to obtain their thoughts on this article but I have reservations as to their frame of mind considering they just received news of losing a loved one. Were they in shock when they provided you with a reply? Not everyone is "in their right mind" immediately after experiencing a tragedy. Did you consider this or were you more interested in getting the story out there?
Posted by:One With CompassionAugust 30, 2007 7:23:13 PMRespond ^
What an amazing story...A true display of the horrors and realities of war...Every Canadian should read this... My condolences to the families of those who have passed away or have been wounded as a result of this conflict...
Posted by:Canadian GunnerSeptember 4, 2007 5:37:06 PMRespond ^
What an amazing story...A true display of the horrors and realities of war...Every Canadian should read this... My condolences to the families of those who have passed away or have been wounded as a result of this conflict...
Posted by:Canadian GunnerSeptember 4, 2007 6:23:08 PMRespond ^
Doctor Patterson.you tried to further your carreer by writing about the death of my brother's son.but for some reason you are at the top of your world and you will go no higher.infact you will start to fall,that I promiss you...why did you go over there?and how could you write so much in such little time?how much did you get paid from mother jones? and how much did the army pay you?by the sound of it you had this planned.you make me SICK
Posted by:John Megeney Kevin's UnclSeptember 5, 2007 4:33:58 PMRespond ^
Clara Jeffery, co-editor of Mother Jones: In reference to your contacting the family to obtain their permission, read the article on the following web site - http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007 /08/04/soldier-story.html#skip300x250 Patterson's not the only insensitive one. You are a vulture, Jeffery. I agree with the idea of Kevin's name being left out. He is not the only soldier who, unfortunately, lost his life in Afghanistan. His name could have been left out and your readers could have made their assumptions as to the soldier's identity. The story would have been just as effective with its account of this event of war. I truly hope that your magazine AND Patterson get what's coming to you!
Posted by:D. Murphy, HalifaxSeptember 14, 2007 8:04:56 AMRespond ^
I don't think its an issue whether the mother gave permission or not, or of burying your head or anything like that. The Doctor demonstrated a catastrophic lack of empathy, which makes me doubt whether he should be a doctor at all. The journal demonstrated a real lack of ethics, Mother's permission not withstanding. How would the author or editor feel if their violent deaths were publicized in the same sensationalist way? Remember also: this wasn't a death in combat. This was an accident. Will they give us glossies next time he deals with the product of a car or hunting accident? The Doctor, as well, was a member of the mission. He should not have gone if his real agenda was to gain notoriety for himself. Having gone he should have realised that it wasn't about HIM. In such a story the real hero is the author. The poor dead bugger becomes a thing. Can't most of us imagine what war's like, even if we haven't been there, without him earning a buck and making a name telling us -- based, of course, on his highly hazardous six week tour as a contractor, confined to Kandahar airfield? I agree with Chris Jenkins. This is cut from the same cloth as the generally ghoulish media coverage of this war. I expect that the Globe's objection (if any) is that it didn't get to publish the story first. I might have hoped that we, as a nation, were rather more compassionate and adult than this. I guess, however, that we just don't really have a schmick.
Posted by:Winston Churchill, LondonSeptember 18, 2007 8:29:07 AMRespond ^
I am a Board Certified radiologist with 22 years of service in the US Army, currently in the Reserves, who would like to volunteer for a 90 day tour in Afghanistan. I am getting nowhere on my end with the response being that there is no need for a radiologist for a 90 days boots on the ground tour now anywhere in the world. Could you possibly put me in touch any hospitals in Afghanistan that could use my services. My e-mail is gonzalo.correa@us.army.mil My cell is 504-421-4911 and my home is 504-831-9637. I would greatly appreciate any assistance you could give.
Posted by:MAJ Gonzalo CorreaSeptember 21, 2007 9:32:48 AMRespond ^
The story must be told....................names should be omitted................but the story must be told.
Posted by:Army GuySeptember 21, 2007 10:32:07 AMRespond ^
Not sure who is more courageous, Patterson or Clara Jeffrey, Editor (see her comments). By continuing to sanitize stories from war zones, the media makes it appear that our soldiers are merely performing a job and deaths become unfortunate events...the equivalent of a car accident in the company parking lot. Patterson reveals the true picture of living in a conflict zone...the real chance of dying at any moment. Lives changes forever, regardless of coming out alive. It is this reality that everyone in a democracy must be clear on whenever a government sends it's Forces into these scenarios. Obviously we have to re-think what we are doing over there and the human expence that Patterson reveals (and Jeffrey tactfully supports) is what we should be basing our sence of urgency on. Sincere condolences to the Mageney family. Personally, I believe Kevin's death will not be in vain, partly due to the honesty of this article.
Posted by:Ex-SoldierSeptember 21, 2007 2:11:42 PMRespond ^
I commend Dr. Patterson for his caring attitude and committed approach to treating the wounded soldiers in Afghanistan. Frankly, and as a Canadian, I have no problem with what has been written in Dr. Patterson's report about Canadian, American or Afghan soldiers. His description of the wounded and life on the base was well written and it is clear that he cared about his patients. Tragically, the family has lost a loved one and are naturally grieving. I am sad for them. However, I strongly feel that Canadians (and Americans) need to be aware of the graphic details and consequences of war as opposed to the "CNN sanitized version." Dr. Patterson, thank you for the great work you have done for all of the soldiers you have attended to in Afghanistan!
Posted by:BC CanadianSeptember 22, 2007 7:28:40 AMRespond ^
To those people saying that it should be pulled you should feel ashamed.If you didn't happen to notice, the very family members and friends of the victim would like it to stay.For the people critisizing the dotor.What, you think it was easy for him?
Posted by: canadianSeptember 24, 2007 8:12:58 PMRespond ^
I believe Dr. Kevin Patterson is on staff at Nanaimo Regional General Hospital in BC.
Posted by:Nurse in Nanaimo, BCNovember 8, 2007 6:13:51 PMRespond ^
Way to say it Dr. A. Battad!!!
Posted by:LeeNovember 8, 2007 6:29:38 PMRespond ^
Thank you for mentioning our special forces. (New Zealand) Your account brings the reality of war to the reader. It also brings the humanity of those who are suffering and affected in this war both soldiers and civilians. Someone wrote that you should not have described the injuries and death of the young soldier. I know if it were my son I should want to know every detail. Not for me a sanitised telegram. Thank you for bringing the reality of this war into our homes. Its a much more personal account than one gets on the news. Carolyn Stirling (NZ)
Posted by:Carolyn StirlingDecember 2, 2007 5:40:40 PMRespond ^
Peter how is my son? please reply lmerkle258@comcast.net
Posted by:Lorraine MerkleFebruary 13, 2008 3:12:15 PMRespond ^
try it http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Ultram_/
Posted by:brianFebruary 20, 2008 11:00:30 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com