Scenes From the Tar Wars
Page 4 of 4
|
|
|
|
Eventually, people in high places started paying attention to O'Connor, but not in the way he'd hoped. Last January, Canada's national health agency accused him of professional misconduct, claiming he had raised "undue alarm" about environmental health threats and "engendered a sense of mistrust" in government authorities. When government doctors had finally examined medical records from Fort Chipewyan, as O'Connor had long requested, they said that its cancer rate was no higher than the rest of the province's. They'd discovered only one case of cholangiocarcinoma, not the five that O'Connor had cited. At Health Canada's request, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta is investigating O'Connor; if the allegations are substantiated, he could lose his medical license. O'Connor says that when he learned of the charges, he ran to the bathroom and retched.
However, the government's review of O'Connor's claims has been far from comprehensive. Georg MacDonald, the former director of Fort Chipewyan's health clinic, told me she has records of two cases of bile-duct cancer. Although O'Connor says he referred his bile-duct cancer patients to specialists in Edmonton and Fort McMurray, the government never examined those cities' cancer cases to see if they'd originated in Fort Chip. A spokeswoman for the Alberta Cancer Board admitted to me that "those are the things we are looking at right now." At press time, O'Connor was still waiting for the results of the investigation. "If it finds me really wrong," he says, "then I will just give up medicine."
In the meantime, Fort Chipewyan's health board decided to look into the cancer cluster itself, hiring an ecology consultant to independently analyze local pollution data. His report, released last November, found rising concentrations of mercury, arsenic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pah) in the lower Athabasca River. Thirty to forty percent of walleye tested for mercury exceeded levels deemed safe in Canada for consumers; all exceeded the U.S. epa's standard for subsistence fishermen. The consultant also found that a government study had lowballed the levels of arsenic in the food supply. "Their data are cooked," he proclaimed.
While dismissing this analysis as incomplete and misleading, the province's scientists could not fully explain the rise in concentrations of pah, a common hydrocarbon found in everything from crude oil to tobacco smoke to barbecued ribs. Since the 1930s, pah has been known as a human carcinogen. Tar sands mining has been linked to increased pah levels in fish; the pah levels in the lower Athabasca are twice those known to cause cancer in fish. Recent peer-reviewed studies have found that arsenic—also present in high concentrations in the Athabasca River—can interact with pah to increase the cancer risk to fish by a factor of 10. Studies of Ohio's Black River, the Chesapeake Bay, and the Puget Sound have linked pah exposure to rare bile-duct cancers in fish—the same type of cancer O'Connor saw in some residents of Fort Chipewyan.
This array of findings "has added to our concern that there may be a human impact" in Fort Chipewyan, says Jeff Short, an environmental chemist with the National Marine Fisheries Service in Alaska who studied the impacts of pah from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Short and a team of Canadian and American researchers are conducting additional environmental studies in Fort Chipewyan this year. It's the kind of work that the provincial government should have done on its own long ago, says David Schindler, a water ecologist at the University of Alberta. "Nobody has done a comprehensive summary that would give me any comfort if I were a resident of Fort Chip," he says.
But the uncertainty surrounding O'Connor's cancer findings has provided some breathing room for the oil industry, which maintains that its operations aren't the source of the pollution in the Athabasca River. Government scientists point out that the river had high levels of mercury and pah long before its banks were lined with strip mines. An industry-funded report concluded that the river was no dirtier today than if the tar sands had been left undisturbed.
Many in Fort Chipewyan aren't buying it. Last August the town saw its first anti-tar-sands rally. A few months later more than a dozen major environmental organizations joined the Fort Chipewyan tribes and other First Nations groups in Alberta to call for an immediate moratorium on additional tar sands development.
Yet even as Fort Chipewyan's leaders have publicly called for an end to the mining, they are quietly thinking about bringing the boom to their own back yard. Townspeople are speculating about plans to build a pipeline that would pump water from Lake Athabasca to the mines. And Canadian and Chinese energy companies and a Dutch shipping firm have been discussing construction of a port on Lake Athabasca's undeveloped south shore, part of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation. Barges loaded with refinery parts from Asia would sail from the Arctic Ocean to the new port, where they would be loaded onto trucks and rolled south to the mines on a new superhighway, bypassing the clogged Highway of Death. For the first time in nearly 200 years, the people of Fort Chip would be at the crossroads of the largest industry in Canada, collecting shipping royalties and maybe even selling rights to the uranium deposits next to the new road.
"Certainly there will be quite a debate between the generations about a port and a highway," says John Rigney, the ceo of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation. "The older generation is very worried about what the land can sustain, and the younger generation is excited about the opportunities it could bring—and the wealth. The wealth could be immense. These First Nations stand to become as rich as the Arabs if all this develops."
Fort Chipewyan's uncertain future weighs heavily on O'Connor. He's grown tired of the grit of Fort McMurray, the long hours on call, and the burden of accusation. "It's constant; it's consuming," he explains. "I can't remember the last time I had a good night's sleep."
Last fall, he quit his job and said goodbye to Alberta (although he still makes frequent visits). He has been replaced by a new doctor who has kept a much lower profile. "I'm not a whistleblower," O'Connor says. "I'm just asking questions as a simple, humble family physician." He now lives across the continent, in Nova Scotia, in a house overlooking blue rollers and a beach of pure, white sand.
Photo: Edward Burtynsky
As if Canadians *don't* know that the 'Sands' is a nightmare? Do you think we don't know what happened to IRAQ isn't a cautionary tale of what happens when a resource becomes spotlighted by 'what is best for American Interests'?
wake up. The entire nation sat upright & began gophering when Ann Coulter announced, "Canada is "lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent";
Carlson: "Without the U.S., Canada is essentially Honduras"...
COULTER: "There is also something called, when you're allowed to exist on the same continent of the United States of America, protecting you with a nuclear shield around you, you're polite & you support us when we've been attacked on our own soil. They [Canada] violated that protocol."...
"They better hope the United States doesn't roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent."
"If we were not the United States of America, Canada -- I mean, we're their trading partner. We keep their economy afloat."
- http://mediamatters.org/items/200412010011
Get the picture?
We're not scrabbling oil because we CHOOSE to sell oil & destroy the ecology (oh, you mean AMERICANS want the Athabasca River water, 'enough to supply a city of 2 million"!, p.66, oh I'm sorry... YOU want it, so *we're* squandering it... right?)
We're selling oil because: its one of the few things **we're permitted** to do.
American industry has *crushed* Canadian industry & labour, via American funding & government policies. Our unions are gutted because American unions act not out of international worker Solidarity, but as if they are in competition with Brotherhood (notice: how many American unions are protesting for the abuses of Iraqi oil workers? not as many as a LIBERAL would expect. ILWU Canada received brotherhood solidarity request from *abused* Iraqi union organizers ("play by our American rules & we'll give you *our* democracy! no, ignore our PSA demands!" http://www.itfglobal.org/solidarity/solidarity-1148.cfm )
Do you think Canadians are blind? What you think we don't **listen** to David Suzuki? we'd LOVE to implement Kyoto Protocols. Have you asked why international corporate lobbyists (not a traditional Canadian institution, BTW) inundate Ottawa? Why did I spend a wedding reception last Summer in Bermuda listening to a woman shriek at me that I was a 'terrorist' because I mentioned David Suzuki, as well looked at the beach? corporate PROPAGANDA.
We're not blind, we're desperate. This isn't about a pack of ignorant savages in the Wilderness, or a a lone doctor. The entire nation knows what is going on... but nobody is in a position to help make it stop. The millions being dumped from abroad into developing the Sands does an effective job of creating an illusion of stability in the economic centres & eases social burdens on traditionally disenfranchised areas of economic disparity.
1. American institutions are dumping **millions** of dollars into Canada's 'ReichWing' agencies to promote
- 'pro-Americanism',
- 'pro-Life',
- 'pro-gun' worship,
- pro-privatized healthcare...
...if its ugly & American, its being funded as a 'personal prosperity & freedom' program in our nation.
2. oil companies are engaged in a massive orgy of their own... & hiring everyone they can get their hands on & throwing money around to 'ecological impact consultants' who tell economic centres & First Nations groups that the impact isn't as massive. While vacationing in Cuba this Feb, I was stunned to meet a young Canadian woman who wrote reports for US oil companies to downplay First Nations concerns. She was a graduate of an *environmental* program.
3. NAFTA pillaged the Canadian economy. It wasn't enough that we were sold out by our own gov't. Nah, American agencies also negotiated in bad faith, forcing Canadian industries to return again & again to renegotiate that which had already been agreed upon. Over & over, in & out of negotiating rooms... as our industries died.
Need an example? This should cover it for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-Uj-nw3XUk
3. Ecological decline... ever wonder why the waterways of Canada's East Coast are acidified? gee... out of sight, out of mind... we get it... trust me. we get it.
4. KBR is currently going to the Supreme Court of Canada to **CHANGE LABOUR & PRIVACY LAWS** in Canada. Seems if you're raped in Iraq, you're a menace. If you have a private life in Canada? you're a menace to your co-workers during work hours.
SO:
this article is truthful but shallow.
... most offensively, written as if those poor ignorant & greedy Canadians are completely oblivious to the hazards of our ecology & social platforms. Surprise. we're not. We're freaking desperate because our economy has been -& continues to be!- pillaged by corruption.
You think *Americans* suffered under NAFTA? you've gotta be kidding.
I love how Americans write articles about leaving their nation as if they're suddenly wandering amongst the Great UnWashed or uneducated.
WE KNOW its bad... its not like American institutions leave us many alternatives...
..& we've got 'we love the "NAFTA on Steroids"-cum-"Security & Prosperity Partnership" *Harper*. (nuff said on *that*)
http://www.canadians.org/integratethis/
Meanwhile... we *know* you're panting over the Border demanding we cough up water we can't afford to be polluting. We know this.
http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2005/01/maude_barlow.html
So, basically the story reads to a Canadian like this:
a. Canadians soooo dumb.
b. Canadians soooo cruel.
c. Canadians soooo polluting the water that should be rightfully commodified to American corporate interests.
d. Canadians have substandard social mores
e. why can't those Canadians be more like AMERICANS?
But... wouldn't it be nice if Americans published articles about Canada that didn't act as if the American standards were the ONLY global standards? What is 'normal' for Americans, isn't 'the norm' for the Rest of the World.
People talk about the 'horrors' of the Sands. Damn right. They're horrible, much like what happened in Russia.
But the *article* was downright laughable, if it hadn't betrayed that quintessential American hubris, "if you're not us, you're peasants".
I'm disappointed with the Mother Jones editorial staff. really. I am.
~~~
Spread Love...
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"Do no harm"
http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2008/05/crude-jolt-for.html
===
"The SPP keeps U.S. tanks full"
May 7, 2008, Brent Patterson, an op-ed by the Council of Canadian
http://www.canadians.org/integratethis/energy/2008/May-7.html
"The following op-ed by Brent Patterson, director of campaigns and organizing with the Council of Canadians, appeared in today’s Windsor Star:
In 2006, the Security and Prosperity Partnership called for a fivefold expansion of tarsands oil production.
While right-wing pundits are claiming the SPP is dead, the new pipeline network announced by TransCanada Corps last month to connect Alberta oil to southern U.S. markets shows that plans for North American energy integration are going full steam ahead.
But the federal Conservatives and the Alberta government are worried that the rising call to reconsider the existing trade model to ensure that the environment and workers' rights trump corporate interests will affect the U.S. appetite for Alberta oil.
Ron Stevens, Alberta's deputy minister and minister of International and Intergovernmental Relations, is heading for Washington this week to promote oil from the province's tar sands as "environmentally sustainable."
The Alberta government is investing millions of taxpayer money in a U.S. ad campaign bearing the same message.
At the news conference that wrapped up the recent North American Leaders' Summit, Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated, "Canada is the biggest and most stable supplier of energy to the United States in the world. That energy security is more important now than it was 20 years ago when NAFTA was negotiated, and will be even more important in the future."
This was a clear warning from Mr. Harper to hopeful Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, as well as the American people, that they should stop any consideration of the idea that NAFTA be renegotiated.
Mr. Harper's strategy here seems to be informed by comments made by US Ambassador David Wilkins in November 2006. At that time, Mr. Wilkins said, "Secretary Bodman told the Alberta oil executives that if they could produce five million barrels per day they would have the United States' attention. I believe that the investors and producers in the oil sands and the government of Alberta and Canada have every intention of meeting that goal in the future. So stay tuned."
Canada is already the biggest supplier of crude oil to the United States. In 2007, Canada shipped an astonishing average of 1.848 million barrels of oil a day to the United States. But the United States wants even more, and Mr. Harper seems determined to provide it to them -- at whatever the cost to our own energy security and the environment -- and in spite of public opinion.
In terms of our own security of supply, Canada is increasingly importing oil for our own needs from countries that are not as "stable" or "secure" as Canada, as Mr. Harper might put it. In fact, Statistics Canada reported in February that while Canada remains a net oil exporter, our imports have increased to 851,000 barrels of oil per day. About half of this amount comes from Algeria, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Additionally, a November 2007 National Energy Board report found Canada will become a net importer of natural gas by around 2028 if production and price trends continue, with the shortfall being met by liquefied natural gas from overseas.
The same day that Mr. Harper made his comments in New Orleans -- which was also notably Earth Day -- Statistics Canada released a report saying Canada's greenhouse gas emissions from the production of exported energy jumped by 146 per cent since 1990. And in order to get this oil to the United States, we are now hearing that Kinder Morgan Canada is constructing a pipeline through Jasper National Park and Mount Robson National Park in order to ship some 40,000 barrels of oil a day from the tarsands to them.
And while Mr. Harper likes to describe Canada as an "energy superpower." Canadians are feeling the pinch. The latest national price survey shows the average price for gasoline in Canada is now $1.23 a litre. This is approaching an all-time high for Canadians to be paying at the pump.
So it should be no surprise that Canadians reject the course that Mr. Harper and Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach want to take us on. Recent polling conducted by the Environics Research Group for the Council of Canadians demonstrates that 89 per cent of Canadians agree Canada should establish an energy policy that provides reliable supplies of oil, gas and electricity at stable prices and protects the environment, even if this means placing restrictions on exports and foreign ownership of Canadian supplies.
Canadians and Americans are telling their leaders that they want a debate on NAFTA and our energy future. Mr. Harper should take these concerns seriously instead of continuing to cling to NAFTA and a vision of Canada that is seemingly limited to being America's gas tank."
===
Brent Patterson is director of campaigns and organizing at the Council of Canadians"
http://www.canadians.org/integratethis
~~~
Spread Love...
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"Do no harm"
In the early 1980s there were only two mines active in Fort McMurray - the Syncrude & Suncor mines 25 miles north of the city - and the pop. was only about 30,000. Consequently my comments may appear somewhat dated.
Curious that the author goes all the way to Ft. Chip. - I'd be interested to learn what the people in Ft. McKay and/or Anzac think about the situation - if those communities still exist.
Both David Suzuki & the Sierra Club published rather detailed exposes about the environment impact of this development in the late '70s - much of what the author persents was predicted way back then.
I saw the devastation the author describes - two things that stand out (for me) more vividly are:
- the sulphur - great clouds of sulphur dioxide laden smoke from the refineries, mountains of bright yellow sulphur mineral - byproducts of the extraction process.
- 1000+ acres of pristine Boreal forest, immediately adjacent to the city (Ft. McMurray) destroyed - stripped off right down to the sterile "hardpan" (clay) - to make way for housing that, at that time, was unlikely to be required.
However three things I witnessed, that will never go away are ....
- the Aurora (borealis) .... in January/February, @ Mariana Lake(s), about 60 miles south of the Fort on the "Highway of Death" (formerly Bechtel 500) .... there are not sufficient superlatives in the English language to describe the experience
- the slow progress of a huge forest fire across the horizon - east of the City, across the Clearwater River, about 50 miles away - it took almost 2 weeks to pass
- wolves - wild packs, hunting in their natural habitat - chasing deer (their dinner) into the townsite for "the kill" - silently emerging from the tree line as I stood, late one winter night, answering the call of nature on the side of the highway (of Death)
These things gave me a small hint about how truly insignificant we (humans) are. A small hint of who actually "owns" the world we live on.
The bottom Line is MONEY ....
- if it wasn't for the money I (the people) would never have been there.
- if it wasn't for the money the mines wouldn't be there.
- if it wasn't for the money the $Cdn won't be where it is.
- if it wasn't for the money this problem would not likely exist.
Ho Hum ....
... as with (virtually) all other single industry/resource towns - when there's no more money to be made, the mines will close, the (non-native) people will leave, & the city will be (virtually) abandoned.
One question I have is - who will repair the damage??
2. As a refresher in world history, when Henry-the-Eight declared the Catholic Church banned from England and installed himself as the leader (pope) of the newly formed Anglican Church, a monastery of monks were evicted and expelled. As it turns out, this particular monastery had discovered how to smelt metals, about 200 years before it was officially recognized in our historical record books. They had devised a labyrinth of underground passages which allowed them to produce the necessary heat.
So, the point is, by 2008, we should have had multiple clean alternatives to oil, coal and these tar sands. I can only assume that our techno progress is constantly being stifled by an endless procession of King Henries. Human greed threatens to destroy humanity.
The only silver lining in this dark carbon cloud is that wind and solar are that much more economically viable. Let's hope that the next Administration will devote the funds to give both technologies the "pump-priming" they need to displace fossil fuel for home and business use in the very near term.
how hard would it be to over take some guys riding on horses with red suits on.
surely we can find a reason to invade canada. i mean they have universal health care that makes them socialists and that is communism in most americans minds and we have to stop communism from coming over here. ie vietnam.
bush and cheney work on that. right up your ally. yes the ally is slime but that did not stop you from envading iraq.
god i love being a super power all that oil is ours. pure black gold.
god bless america truly greatest county on earth.
http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnN20327333.html
Rock on MoJo
Hasn't anyone told you that the US owns the world and your job is to shut up and do as you are told; please see Noam Chomsky.
I hadn't thought about the environmental implications of this.
W.
You may not realize it, but your a whole lot more like America than you think. When I go to Canada, I see the exact same greed in Canadians that I do in America. I do see perhaps a greater awareness of it being wrong, but that is all. The two nations are very similar (minus the frenchy factor). You can pretend your on some high pedestal of morality all you wish. While doing so, you might want to close your eyes as that Ferrari passes you with Canadian plates. They didn't get that car by being patron saints you know.
Thank you for pointing out the very salient point that Canada and the US are two parts of the same civilization--I like to tell my Canadian friends who start into a "Canada is better than America" rant that as an American (currently living in Canada) that there is essentially NO DIFFERENCE between our imaginary societies.
However, I understand Blueberry's anger. Canada's democratic processes are going feral before our eyes and this is illuminated by the environmental and human rights nightmare of the Albertan Tar Sands. I think, for the most part, Canadians in the know are as outraged by what's happening there as anything, but our deep integration with US corporate empire makes us powerless to stop it.
As a side note--MADONNA... you're right, Natives are getting shafted yet again. And I do think that there remains a very strong current of racism directed at Native Canadians that plays into this.
Good work and thank you.
"Only when the last tree has withered, the last fish has been caught, and the last river has been poisoned, will you realize you cannot eat money."
May the Great Spirit Bless you all and never forget that our luxuries are readily available to us at a great expense to Mother Earth and Indigenous People-in Canada and the United States.
"Only when the last tree has withered, the last fish has been caught, and the last river has been poisoned, will you realize you cannot eat money."
May the Great Spirit Bless you all and never forget that our luxuries are readily available to us at a great expense to Mother Earth and Indigenous People-in Canada and the United States.