America's Unwelcome Advances
Page 2 of 2
|
|
In 2006, newly elected Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa declared that he wouldn't renew the American lease when it expires in November 2009—unless, he tauntingly proposed the following year, the United States would let Ecuador have a base in Miami. Correa has since offered to lease the air base to the Chinese for commercial use. Ecuador also rejected a US bid to set up a base on the island of Baltra in the Galápagos, a protected wildlife refuge. The 180 US soldiers and several hundred contractors (according to the New York Times) at Manta are said to be seeking a new home in either Colombia or Peru.
Peru has proved problematic for the Pentagon. In July 2008, the US sent close to 1,000 soldiers to "dig wells and do public health work" in the southern Ayacucho region, an area once controlled by the Shining Path guerrillas. The US deployment, while seemingly harmless, has provoked demonstrations in many Peruvian cities, where such "friendship" missions are viewed as a pretext for an expanded US military presence. There is an airfield in Ayacucho—Los Cabitos—that the Americans would like to occupy, as it might provide easy access to Bolivia and Colombia. At the end of July, Colombia's defense minister chimed in, declaring that the country will not welcome a US base, although it will continue to cooperate with US military efforts in the region.
The US faces popular protests against its bases in numerous other countries. Disputes over military pollution and the handling of soldiers suspected of crimes have led to widespread resentment of US troop presence in South Korea and the Japanese prefecture of Okinawa. Meanwhile, in Italy, where the United States still has at least 83 military installations, demonstrations erupted in 2006 when it was revealed that the government would let the US Army greatly enlarge its base in the northern city of Vicenza.
A town of about 120,000 nestled midway between Venice and Verona, Vicenza was home and showplace of the renowned Renaissance architect Andrea Palladio, whose work so impressed Thomas Jefferson that he incorporated Palladian themes into his plantation at Monticello and the Rotunda at the University of Virginia. Vicenza already housed 6,000 US troops when, in late 2003, US officials began secretly negotiating to bring in four more Army battalions from Germany. The Americans proposed closing Vicenza's small municipal airport at Dal Molin, across town from the existing base, so they could build barracks and other facilities at the airport for 1,750 additional troops.
But locals still haven't forgotten the 1998 incident in which a US Marine pilot from nearby Aviano Air Base severed an Italian gondola cable with his jet, killing 20 skiers. The pilot, who'd been flying his Prowler faster and lower than Pentagon regulations permit, was later acquitted by a US military court, although he did serve five months in prison for destroying evidence in the form of a cockpit video. Local opposition to the Vicenza proposal led local judges to suspend work at Dal Molin in June, leading to a standoff with the Berlusconi government, which supports the base expansion. A month later, the Council of State, Italy's highest court, overturned the local decision, declaring that "the authorization of a military base is the exclusive competency of the state."
Similar disputes are unfolding in Poland, the Czech Republic, South Korea, and Japan. For several years the Pentagon has been negotiating with the Polish and Czech governments to build bases in their countries for radar-tracking and missile-launching sites as part of its proposed anti-ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile) network against an alleged threat from Iran. Russia, however, does not accept the US explanation, and believes these bases are aimed at it. In July, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice successfully concluded a missile defense deal with the Czech government, but it still requires ratification by the Parliament, with two-thirds of the population said to be opposed. While the Polish government had been slow to sign on, Russia's recent attack on Georgia appears to have changed its attitude. In light of Russian assertiveness, the Poles quickly accepted the American proposal to base anti-missile missiles on their soil. It remains to be seen whether this will solidify American defensive commitments to Poland or further inflame Russia's relations with NATO.
In South Korea, America faces massive protests over its attempt to construct new headquarters at Pyeongtaek, some 40 miles south of Seoul, where it hopes to locate 17,000 troops and associated civilians, for a total of 43,000 people. Pyeongtaek would replace the Yongsan Garrison, the old Japanese headquarters in central Seoul that US troops have occupied since 1945.
Meanwhile, the United States and Japan are locked in a perennial dispute over the $1.86 billion Japan pays annually to support US troops and their families on the main islands of Japan and Okinawa. The Japanese call this the "sympathy budget" in an expression of cynicism over the fact that the US cannot seem to afford its own foreign policy. The Americans want Japan to pay more, but the Japanese have balked.
All overseas US bases create tensions with the people forced to live in their shadow, but one of the most shameful examples involves the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia. During the 1960s, the US leased the island from Great Britain, which, on behalf of its new tenant, forcibly expelled the entire indigenous population, relocating the islanders some 1,200 miles away in Mauritius and the Seychelles. (See "Homesick for Camp Justice.")
Today Diego Garcia is a US naval and bomber base, espionage center, secret CIA prison, and transit point for prisoners en route to harsh interrogation at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. It has an anchorage for some 20 ships, a nuclear-weapons storage facility, a 12,000-foot runway, and accommodations and amenities for 5,200 Americans and 50 British police. According to many sources, including retired General Barry McCaffrey, the base was used after 9/11 as a prison for high-value detainees from the Afghan and Iraq wars. It is called Camp Justice.
Perhaps the most recent sign of trouble brewing for America's overseas enclaves is the world's condemnation of its long-term ambitions in Iraq. In June, it was revealed that the US was secretly pressing Iraq to let it retain some 58 bases on Iraqi soil indefinitely, plus other concessions that would make Iraq a long-term dependency of the United States. (See "Our Way or the Highway.") The negotiations over a long-term American presence have been a debacle for the rule of law and what's left of America's reputation, even if the lame-duck Bush administration backs down in the end.
Like all empires of the past, the American version is destined to come to an end, either voluntarily or of necessity. When that will occur is impossible to foretell, but the pressures of America's massive indebtedness, the growing contradiction between the needs of its civilian economy and its military-industrial complex, and its dependence on a volunteer army and innumerable private contractors strongly indicate an empire built on fragile foundations. Over the next few years, resistance to America's military overtures is likely to grow, meaning the agenda of national politics will be increasingly dominated by issues of empire liquidation—peacefully or otherwise.
Chalmers Johnson is the author of Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic. It is the final volume of his Blowback Trilogy, which includes Blowback (2000) and The Sorrows of Empire (2004).

Israel had their little 'incounter' with Hezbollah, summer of 2006, and learned a little about 'how the other side lives. Now the Bushwacker has gone through the same experience.
The Great Satan has forgotten about WTC and needs a new 'reminder.' The Russian bear can do that.
Later this year the Russian fleet will be visiting Venezuela and it will be 'refreshing' to hear that the Russians will be building a future ABM site in Venezuela with the radar installations perhaps in Cuba. Whooppee, then the Great Satan will 'really' know how the 'other side lives!
TheAZCowBoy
Tombstone, AZ.
dba: IDidntVote4TheBassTewrd@msn.com.
Aside from my petty observation on your terminology, I agree with the essence of your observations.
I long for the day when my nation becomes the nation of our Constitution and the neo-liberal ilk no longer exist. Imagine America working with the rest of the world instead of being at odds with it.
Good article.
Seriously, this is exactly the sort of "threat" that has led us time and again to interfere in the proper progress of many nations' internal development.
And why do I say "another" US-backed coup, for Ecuador? True, we haven't done any such thing (yet) in the classic military sense; but don't forget the Chicago Boys. These Milton Freidman-steeped "free" marketeers swept into Ecuador a few decades ago, and remade the entire government to be a free-marketeer's wet dream, selling off (to American companies) many perfectly functional and efficient state-run assets, supposedly to alleviate the spiralling inflation caused by economic injustice, itself caused by a massive shift of land from peasant ownership to large private interests.
That's right, the economic "cure" for the rich taking land out of food production in order to produce export crops for profit, was to sell off government functions, and governance itself, to the very same rich people.
Yes, eventually the price of food went down, but that was partly due to decreased demand as impoverished people died off. Sure, the protests at such treatment died off too, but again that was due to the death or imprisonment of the protesters, and intimidation of the rest of the population. Ecuador was deemed a "success" by the Chicago Boys, and held up to the world community as an example of turning a country around.
As always, the blinders of the "free-marketeers" only focused on the riches to be found, in this new easy-in, easy-out method of colonizing; and not on any actual benefits to the population. They called it economic "shock therapy." We should call it just plain shocking.
And as always, our own government, much beholden to these same profit interests, turned a blind eye to the devastation of Ecuadorian culture and autonomy. Instead of a rich, vibrant, self-sufficient and proud people, Ecuador was turned into a company town, the work done by slave-wage peons, for the benefit of foreign landlords and their local minions. This was the "success" of the Chicago School makeover of the country. No big wonder, why they now have an attitude toward us. We've earned every bit of it.
And not only Ecuador, by any means. Central and South America are rife with such stories, where American and American-backed commercial interests invaded and subverted the natural governing processes for their own profit interests. It would be strange indeed, if we were NOT hated, by anyone who still has a brain in this hemisphere.
Hatred toward America is not sour grapes. It's not ignorance of the "benefits" we can bring another country, or of the "security" we promise our willing subjects, for siting rights or other accomodations. It's certainly not the oft-cited "envy" for our way of life. Hatred toward America is nothing more than a memory of the real results of our historic interventions in any country we chose to focus on.
Hugo Chavez, for example, is not paranoid; because we really ARE out to get him. He's seen how we work; and his caution, including raising the world visibility of Venezuala's situation, is perfectly sane. If he first tells us to keep our distance, then publically kicks out our spies, he makes sure that if we DO intervene in his country, we must do it militarily, not from within. He's learned the lesson of American intervention in Central American affairs, and all of America's programmed masses hate him for it.
What's a poor troll to do, when confronted by REAL facts, rather than carefully-tailored fact-less talking points?
So, on behalf of troll-kind, I urge you to lighten up a bit, so they can get a toe-hold. Using one's brain hurts, doncha know. Just throw in a couple of crazy assertions here and there, to get their limbic systems pressured up, and they can run with it, troll-fashion.
Otherwise, they'll have to grow brains (ouch! that hurts..).
If the only thing keeping our Con Me afloat is more 'defense' spending, then it's time to hire new budget people, and charge the states with attaining to new standards of frugality, union lay-buh or no. Reform. Yes, it sucks. But, it doesn't have to hurt, but you DO have to start somewhere...
water as a result of all of the bombing and other live
ammo testing at these bases isn't even touched upon.
The Constitution is explicit. Article 1, Sec. 8 (11) states that “Congress shall have the power . . . to declare war.” This doesn’t mean authority to note the fact that the president has started a war. It means authority to start a war.
Those who framed the Constitution were reacting against the British system, in which the king could unilaterally take the entire empire into war. The delegates explicitly rejected a proposal to empower the president to initiate conflict. Elbridge Gerry responded that he “never expected to hear in a republic a motion to empower the executive to declare war.” Alexander Hamilton, perhaps as close to a monarchist as anyone attending the constitutional convention, assuaged the concerns of delegates about presidential authority, explaining that it was “in substance much inferior to [that of the king]. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the land and naval forces . . . while that of the British king extends to the declaring of war.”
The United Staes now, as always , is a force for good in the world.
It's not about leftists. It's about people who can see the truth for what it is, something that is clearly absent in your case.
You should read more history - not the pseudo history of a Howard Zinn but real history.
I definitely recommend reading Chalmers Johnson's "Blowback," Michael Sheuer's books "Imperial Hubris" and "Marching Toward Hell," and Ron Paul's "The Revolution: A Manifesto" for much more on this topic.
Tell us again about the freedom enjoyed by the Reds you so admire in Cuba - more than 20,000 opposition/freedom loving citizens executed.
Pinoichet was a patriot who saved his country form Cuba's fate (and what promises to be Venezuela"s fate - BTW- "crater face" Hugo had best remember Salvador)
And you lose any credibility claiming that the USA ordered "mass murder" - we are the most circumspect users of military power in history and have not had a policy of targetting civilians since the Socialst President FDR.
And feel free to get back to me when you can actually cite some real history and not far-left anti-American pap.
And since when does it take "balls" to kill oneself - it is far more the act of a coward.
If you look at commissaries.com, you can quickly find that there are 262 commissaries worldwide (incl. USA - there is a convenient 'store locator' function on the home page). Of these, according to my count, the vast majority are located in the US, Alaska, Hawaii and Guam - all very domestic. How many are located overseas? Just 74 - see my list below (I have removed several still in the commissaries.com list - e.g. GEISSEN, KELLEY BARRACKS, GELNHAUSEN - as they have already closed within 2008).
Thus, the US only maintains 74 actual "bases" - or locations with 'large' military personnel concentrations requiring a commissary - overseas. The vast majority of the 761 "bases" claimed in this article should, in fact, be considered as "sites" or facilities. Many of these consist of warehouses, vehicle park compounds, antenna farms, logistics facilities, individual buildings or kaserns, housing compounds and other minor military facilities.
We really need to remember that a base doesn't just comprise a single establishment - there may be numerous smaller facilities, sites, housing areas, schools, etc., associated with the main location - but it's misleading and false to extend all of these into the "base" count just to bolster the argument.
I am not arguing that a lower count of 74 "bases" makes the excessive US military presence overseas any less of a problem. But I do think that in trying to understand what the Pentagon is doing overseas, and in determining the extent of the military presence outside the US, that we need to clearly define our terms.
((Note that my list of commissaries fails to serve as a proxy for military "bases" in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the US has very large military troop concentrations, but few (none?) commissaries.))
RAF ALCONBURY
RAF FAIRFORD
RAF LAKENHEATH
RAF MILDENHALL
RAF CROUGHTON
MENWITH HILL
VOGELWEH
WIESBADEN
BAUMHOLDER
RAMSTEIN AB
BAD KREUZNACH
BAD NAUHEIM
BITBURG AB
HEIDELBERG
MCCULLY BARRACKS
MANNHEIM
NEUBRUECKE
SPANGDAHLEM AB
SEMBACH AB
BAMBERG
CHIEVRES
BUEDINGEN
SCHINNEN
SCHWEINFURT
VILSECK
ANSBACH
GARMISCH
GRAFENWOEHR
ILLESHEIM
HOHENFELS
PANZER KASERNE
PATCH BARRACKS
CAIRO
IZMIR
LIVORNO
LAJES FIELD AB
RIYADH
VICENZA
ANKARA
ROTA
SIGONELLA
AVIANO AB
NAPLES NSA
INCIRLIK AB
MINEO
SASEBO FA
KADENA AB
CHINHAE NAS
HANNAM VILLAGE
CAMP HUMPHREYS
CAMP STANLEY
CAMP ZAMA
KUNSAN AB
OSAN AB
CAMP CARROLL
CAMP CASEY
TAEGU
YONGSAN
ATSUGI NAF
CAMP KURE
MISAWA AB
SAGAMIHARA
IWAKUNI MCAS
YOKOSUKA NFA
YOKOTA AB
CAMP COURTNEY MCB
CAMP FOSTER MCB
CAMP KINSER MCB
HARIO VILLAGE
CAMP RED CLOUD
CAMP EAGLE
HARIO VILLAGE
CAMP RED CLOUD
CAMP EAGLE
And the ordinary Chilean enjoyed more personal freedom under Pinochet than they would have had under the Marxist/Castro disciple Allende.Only far left Castro supporters who wanted to turn Chile into another Marxist basket case were in danger.
And FDR was a socialist - or do you have another explanation for his "New Deal" policies that is different from Socialism?
And BTW - you have presented no "facts" only typical, left-wing anti-American hysteria.
I bring up Castro because Allende was a disciple of his and had just visited Cuba before the freedom fighters removed him from office.
And I asked if English was your second language because you clearly have no idea what the word "assasinated" means.
The US has not killed a million Iraqis - but your friends the islamo-fascist terrorists have killed thousands - and by deliberately targetting civilians.
As for Socialism in the USA - thanks for your grade school level analysis - the fact is that the Democratic party in the US is a socialist party - it has enacted as much socialism (See FDR/JFK/LBJ/Clinton) as it posibly could in a country where individual freedom and responsiblity still are overwhelmingly admired by the majority of citizens. We are on the path to socialism/Marxism/communism and will plunge further into the abyss if Obama bin Biden are elected by the naive, welfare dependent members of our society.
And the average citizen in Chile under Pinoichet enjoyed far more individual freedom than any citizen in a Marxist country (and Marxism/Communism is where Socialism always ultimately desires to go)
As for my so-called "ignorance" pot meet kettle - a paraphrase of an American saying that you might wish to look up.
Assasinate
Wrong about the deliberate targetting of civilians ( terrorists do that - the USA does not)
Wrong about the Democrats being Socialists
Wrong about the Chileans feelings about Pinochet - Marxists hated him - anti-Marxists respected him
Wrong about my ideology - I support freedom and you don't
The major difference between leftists and conservatives is this:
Conservatives believe that all rights are "rights of the individual"
Leftists believe that only "group rights" matter (hence: affirmative action, collectivism, universal health care, redistribution of wealth from those who own it to those who have no rightful claim to it, the coercive power of the state)
Did I omit any of your misconceptions and errors?
I bloviate until my face falls off.
I don't have any "facts" to back up my arguments.
I don't have even the slightest understanding of socialism, although I like to use it as an insult as often as possible.
I didn't read this article.
I didn't read Chalmer's book.
I don't care that I don't know what I'm talking about, if I talk louder than you, everyone will think I'm smarter.
I throw around labels without any clue what the mean.
Oh, and I'm wrong about everything I just wrote.
Game over - you lose!
Armies are nothing more than parasitic corporate institutions, which not only rob the economy of billions of dollars, they rob our soldiers lives. This is why they brainwash soldiers,and inject them with dangerous pharma drugs during their trainning to turn them into unthinking automatons,who when given a break to visit their families, they kill their wives.
The real reason why they invaded Afghanistan was to get control over the monopoly of narcotics, for everyone knows it is by far more lucrative than the legitimate global economies; and Iraq was next in line due to the fact that Big-Oil owns the US Government, and world economies are imprisoned inside a cancerous "matrix of black crude-oil" created from the beguinning of the twentieth century. This is why Nikola Tesla's unlimited free energy has not been released to the world since 1931.
But by far the most sinister role of the military is when it turns against their own countrymen, and protect tyrannical governments as we have seen happening in Nazi Germany, Stalin's USSR, Mao Tse-Tung's Red China, and more recently Darfur's, and Myanmar's Governments. But if you think this only happens to dictatorship regimes, think again Americans for our country is becoming one. This country is already under martial law. The bailing out of the corrupt banking houses is not to rescue the economy but to pay international bankers who own the Federal Reserve, and wish to further inflate their bank accounts. Their greed knows no bounds. The Pentagon's symbolism is nothing more than a disguised pentagram at the service of "dark forces" who as Ruth Montgomery wrote in her books desire the control of the entire planet. Therefore it is not surprising their recent evil musings of a global empire. They are globalists not only in economic terms but militarily as well.
In fact Americans many Presidents of this nation have betrayed your trust, starting with Woodrow Wilson who sold the Federal Reserve, which is collecting illegally the Income Tax,the IRS and generating dollar bills - with a pyramid and the all seeing eye on top-out of thin air without having the gold reserves to back it. Next comes another weak leader, President Roosevelt who secretly made a deal with Stalin to allow the Russian military machine to first enter Berlin and claim half of Nazy Germany which resulted in the costly cold war that followed. Then comes President Eisenhower who was more interested in golf than in caring for the lives of fellow Americans. Many secret military-medical operations involving the innoculation of mind control drugs, and psychological mind control technics went on under his presidency where street kids, homeless, homosexuals, and American Natives were used as "lab rats".
A parallel, supergovernment called the Majestic Twelve that oversees world affairs rules the United States of America. The United Nations obey these "Majestic Twelve" of which the Rockefellers and the Rothchilds, among ninety other members are enforcing international laws for their benefit. The European Common Market and globalization are their creations. The power of the world resides in the hands of a few. The people of this planet are being set against one another so that they impose their matrix of fear and control upon mankind. The time to unite and expand our minds is now. The lack of awareness is the same as blindness. In this age of information those who remain ignorant and have no interest in seeking the truth are the main victims for they are easily manipulated. Seek the truth Americans and reclaim your freedom while there is time to correct this stark reality.