MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Slovenia's Vanishing Act

Page 2 of 2


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


But to make any headway, the Erased first must combat a number of myths, most significantly that they themselves were responsible for what happened. "I don't think we can talk about 3,000 kids being 'opposed to Slovenia,'" Todorović says, referring to the estimated number of children who were taken off the books. For him, it's a no-brainer that Erasure was intentional. Ilič, whose son was erased when he was six, concurs: "Of course we never had a choice! We have a child — what parent would knowingly disregard their child's well being? Then they say I opposed independence — I voted for independence! They don't even care if their lies make sense!"

But the Erased still have to convince the general public that the country's been duped. In April 2004 a controversial referendum put support for restoration of the Erased's rights at less than 6 percent. Even after a newspaper published documents indicating erasure was deliberate and premeditated, little changed. The government's defense remains a one-two punch of obstinacy and obfuscation. "Nobody was erased, nobody was erased," mutters Bojan Trnovšek, director general for the Internal Administrative Affairs Directorate at the Ministry of the Interior — the office responsible for erasure — as he stacks a mountain of papers on his desk. "They are 'persons without status in Slovenia,'" Nina Gregori, the undersecretary at the ministry, tells me hastily. "It's very complicated."

To spend time in Slovenia's pristine, hospitable towns is to wonder: How does such a thing happen here, a place where so-called outsiders have often intermarried with native Slovenes? Ironically, part of the impetus seems to have come from a wish among Slovenes to distance themselves from the nationalist madness elsewhere in the Balkans — it just so happened that purging some of its residents looked like the best way to get that distance. But at an even deeper level, there lies a genuine fear of extinction.

Slovenia has always belonged to someone else, from the Holy Roman Empire to the Habsburgs to Tito's Yugoslavia. Finally on its own after so many centuries, it finds itself vanishing. Its tiny population has the lowest fertility rate in the EU, and a weak economy pushes its young people abroad. People over 80 are expected to be the single largest demographic group by 2050. Coupled with the anxiety of adopting capitalism, these worries lead to troubling conversations about purity. "We're a peaceful country and we're disappearing," a New Agey young artist named Gregor tells me, before blaming "the vulgar Croats and Bosnians" for filling the void. "They gave Slovenia loud music and curse words. It used to be '400 devils' was the worst you could say here."

Slovenia's version of nationalism was downright charming compared to Milosevič's butchery just over the border. But as John Dalhuisen of the Council of Europe's Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights suggests, charming is how you wind up in the EU rather than the Hague. "How did they get away with this? Compare them to their neighbors," he says. "Anyone who hasn't fired too many bullets in the area in the last 15 years looks pretty good."

On a cold, bright day last February, the ragtag Association of the Erased descends nervously on Ljubljana's parliament building for a peaceful sit-in at a National Assembly session. For many, this is their first time publicly identifying themselves, much less risking confrontation. When they arrive, the building is uncharacteristically flanked by police, who inform Todorović it has been closed to the public for the day.

Todorović huddles with the two dozen novice activists and an alternate plan soon materializes. One by one, they march back and forth across a nearby crosswalk, Abbey Road-style, as traffic builds up behind them. The hastily conceived strategy is meant to draw attention to the cause, and to the fact of the cause. Indeed, Todorović tells me later, he sees the association as standing up against the country's broader slide toward exclusionism — as evidenced by bizarrely repressive new asylum laws, a long-running ban on building a mosque in Ljubljana, institutional homophobia, and what Dalhuisen describes as "a certain reactionary core." If opposing the Erased can be populist political shorthand for proving one's Slovene patriotism, Todorović says, the Erased themselves can be shorthand for opposition to all Slovene intolerance. In December, when the Slovene government made international headlines for forcibly evicting a Roma settlement after a mob made death threats and torched one of the homes, many Erased activists rushed to protest the action.

Back at the parliament building, half the drivers honk angrily, while the other half just stare at the gray-haired and rural protesters. "At least it slows the final transition to global capitalism by a few minutes," sighs Andrej Kurnik, an activist and political science professor. Two hours and one near-scuffle with the police later, the Erased trickle back to their cloistered lives; a kind of shrugging is in the air. Todorović seems to sense it, but the wispy former archaeologist says he'll keep fighting: "Slovenia created this wonderful stereotype of itself to get where it wants to go, this exclusive place far from Yugoslavia. I have to register the truth."

As for Zoran Ilič, it's hard to say whether his goals are more or less ambitious in the end. "What do I want?" he asks. "I lived here 36 years and put so much energy into this country. They say I want all the money that's owed to me, all the wages and insurance and pension they took. But that money comes from my kids' futures, and my kids have already suffered enough. I just want my citizenship."

Like many, Ilič was told his only hope was in returning to war-torn Serbia to find documentation of his and his son's existence. But Serbia had no papers for the boy, as he'd been born in Slovenia. "Good," Ilič recalls thinking at the time. "Now we can move to the moon." Ilič's son's status was quietly restored after a lengthy fight. (Roughly 12,000 of the Erased have been "regularized" as new permanent residents, thereby keeping pensions and reparations out of reach.) "We had to get a divorce, on paper anyway, so my wife wouldn't have my last name," he adds. "It's been horrible, but at the same time I'm blessed, because my family is strong. Not all are so lucky."

Indeed, a number have found the strain unbearable. A few weeks after the parliament protest, Todorović tells me about recruiting a fellow Erased named Dragan when the association was first coming together. Dragan was Todorović's neighbor — a "calm and peaceful" father of two who'd "lost everything, like all of us." The last time Todorović saw him, a decade of extreme poverty and shame had caught up with him; he could no longer bear to eat a single piece of bread, as he considered it food from his daughters' mouths. Two days later, he threw himself under a train. Todorović lingers quietly on this memory for a moment, and then he pushes back from our cafe table. "More to do," he says, and he's gone.

Chris Colin is the author of What Really Happened to the Class of '93, and lived in Slovenia for much of 2006.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

And you belive it? Who attack Slovenia? Who was against independency of slovenia? Who left slovenia? Wha promise a revenge to slovenian? And the real background!!! MOOOONNNNNEEEEYYYY AND REVENGE. (Ask anyone in slovenia (not attackers of course))
Posted by:dont be anothe foolMarch 9, 2008 2:04:14 PMRespond ^
Readers should note that this article is biased against Slovenia, to the point that I had to write the following "rebuttal" below.

The article pictures Slovenia as a human rights violator, without properly presenting all sides of the problem. It makes it sound like Slovenia imposed some undue bureaucratic burden on the "Erased" in 1992, as a result of which the "Erased" failed to obtain citizenship. This is a misrepresentation. Actually, the process was very easy, and the vast majority of the "Erased" would be granted citizenship automatically, had they just followed the procedures. There were plenty of reminders in Slovenian media in 1991 that non-Slovenian born foreigners have to file the paperwork if they want to maintain legal status beyond 1992. There was ample time (at least 6 months) to prepare the paperwork. The vast majority of people in that situation filed the paperwork: 200,000 non-Slovenian-born ex-Yugoslavs obtained citizenship this way, by filing the paperwork properly on time. About 20,000 did not, for several reasons. Not because it was hard, but because they either chose not to, or simply did not care to do so, or decided to move out of Slovenia, or because they simply did not take it seriously. True, some are innocent victims of the situation; they did not know, they made a mistake, they are sorry. If it was only about such people, the problem would be easily solvable. However, in 1991, many of the "Erased" opposed the independence of Slovenia, some actively by force. Many did not want citizenship in 1992, because they did not believe in Slovenia. Instead, they moved back to other former parts of Yugoslavia, unfortunately only to find war and misery. So, they returned to Slovenia a few years later, and started demanding citizenship rights. And not just that, they also demand hefty sums of money for compensation of loss of status.

Regardless of whether they never left or returned back to Slovenia after a few years after 1992, Slovenia did not deport them. But it could. They were violating Slovenian immigration law. I have never ever heard of any Erased acknowledge this fact. Many other countries would deport them. So why did Slovenia not deport them? How about because Slovenia actually cares about families and human misery?

If we are to compare numbers to the United States, as the author does, one should also say that the 200.000 non-Slovenians who were granted citizenship in 1992 amounts to 10% of the population of Slovenia. So, this is as if U.S.A. suddenly granted citizenship to 30 million non-Americans!! Slovenia actually did this, in real life. Few countries in the world have ever been as generous in giving out citizenship to non-natives, especially in such a short period of time.

Also, the figure of 80% of Erased who supposedly filed for citizenship, but were denied, is just false. I think the author was simply misled. Did you verify the 80% anywhere else but through what the "Erased", or their representatives, told you? When did they file? On time, or several years later? Did they submit complete applications? Where is the hard evidence?

Yes, it is trendy to cry foul on human right violations. It is easy to accuse some ex-communist country, knowing that many people will buy it, due to the general human-rights violation stigma of ex-communist countries. And it is heart-breaking to write individual stories, depicting the consequences of one's own actions. But we all have to live with the choices we make in life. And the "Erased" made their choice.

Ask yourself, if a group of foreigners lived in your country and started threatening your sovereignty with arms, would you be inclined to granting them citizenship rights? And if your country offered them citizenship, but they would not take it, what would you think when they came back a few years later accusing your government of human rights violations?

I support individual case-by-case resolution of the problem. I do believe that many Erased indeed are innocent victims and had to go through a lot of hardship as a result. If there truely were bureaucratic errors in some cases, Slovenia should apologize and somehow compensate for it. However, I don't like it how some of the Erased are painting Slovenia dark in the international community, by selectively omitting facts not in their favor. Those that can demonstrate good intentions, plausible stories of why they did not apply, and willingness to contribute to Slovenia's society in the future, should be given a chance for citizenship. But it should be treated as a favor, not as a right. And there should be no financial compensation for those that failed to file on time.

Posted by:Niko KMarch 11, 2008 3:25:46 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















Debate Liveblogging - 10.07.2008

The British Bailout

Debate Preview

Debate Bingo....This Time For Real!


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN

Advertise Liberally

This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS