MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Ode to Bear Stearns

News: Fortunately, I have no stock left in Bear. But I have friends who do, and they've been emailing me as though someone died.

March 18, 2008


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


During the six years that have passed since my days in banking, I've written a lot about companies that combusted into bankruptcy and the human damage their waning flames left behind. I've also written about firms that I thought would surely join their ranks as corporate epitaphs.

But none of them hit close to home until now. With Sunday night's demise (which the media are calling a bailout) of Bear Stearns & Co. at the hands of the Federal Reserve, Henry Paulson's Treasury, and JPMorgan Chase, the professional and personal combined for me. As with Enron, WorldCom, and other corporate catastrophes, there are real people below the top.

A dear friend of mine in the technology area described "a sense of shock and awe when the stock slid to $30 on Friday, and the feeling of getting punched in the face when it reached $2 a share." It's been a long time, but I do feel for him, and some of the others.

My foray into international investment banking began with Bear, Stearns in 1993, in East London. Bear was the first bank resident of the 50-story tower at 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf. Local fishermen arrived before dawn to sell their catch by its waters. Our cafeteria was the fruit lady who used to come by the lobby every afternoon with her wares. Developers had to give away free storefronts to companies like The Body Shop to entice them to the area for pre-Christmas sales. Ultimately, Canary Wharf began to command high rents for luxurious accommodations, a new subway line was constructed to quickly connect it with the city of London, and the fruit lady was replaced by chain restaurants and upscale haunts. The development is now a mini metropolis, the ritzy backdrop for the last James Bond flick.

I ran the European analytics group until leaving to return to the United States and a job at Goldman Sachs in 2000, as the CDO market was climbing from infancy to a $2 trillion global disaster. As the London office grew tenfold, the bank weathered takeover rumors for years—from UBS, to ABN-AMRO, to Deutschebank. During the 1990s, it endured calamities including the 1994 emerging market collapse, the 1997 Asian currency crash, the 1998 Long Term Capital Management implosion.

It was a colorful place, especially compared to the colder elitist environments of Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers (where I also worked briefly). Internally and externally, the talk was always that Bear didn't fit the standard mold. It was the oddball amongst investment banks from the standpoint of "corporate culture"—a "maverick," the Wild West of banking. We actually left our desks to eat lunch. Some of the sales-force drank theirs.

It didn't merely hire the Ivy Leaguers that snottier firms coveted, but people from state schools (like me), or with street knowledge. One of the mortgage-backed securities analysts who worked with me got his job by having worked as former chairman "Ace" Greenberg's doorman.

It was also less connected than its competitors to Washington. It never had the revolving door to the Capitol that Goldman or Citigroup enjoys, never was on the top lists of corporate donors to politicians.

To differentiate itself from more established competitors, Bear concentrated on the more analytically intense products, like mortgage-backed securities, the very first CDO ("collateralized debt obligation," comprised first of emerging market bonds in 1996, then of high-yield, formerly known as "junk," bonds in 1998) and prime brokerage for hedge funds. That's the part that the Fed got JPM to buy while it shelled out $30 billion for the toxic remains of subprime and other esoteric loans to continue greasing the wheels of the industry and avoid a system collapse.

A former colleague who left Bear to head a division at a Japanese bank told me, "Unless you're in this full time, you've got no idea how bad it is. So many assets created in a system with leverage upon leverage upon leverage, and neither the Fed nor the system is big enough to bail itself out."

Fortunately, I have no stock left in Bear (I sold it to support my writing habit), except for a retirement plan worth, well, not so much. My remaining connection is with former colleagues and friends, and people have been emailing me who I haven't heard from in a decade, as though someone had died. Bear was a corporation that underwent, like so many others, explosive growth based on overleveraging subprime and other risky securities. That, coupled with bad management of an unregulated business, is what in the end caused it to run out of cash, much as people who can't pay off their declining valued homes go into foreclosure.

The overriding view that the Fed bailed out this investment bank is wrong. One senior managing director I once worked with said, "This isn't a blowup because of one bad traceable bond trade, but a concerted effort on the part of the government. The Fed closed us down. We had no choice. If we went into bankruptcy, we'd have taken 30 or 40 other firms, all hedge funds that borrow from us, down too. They needed people to think the worst was over. They wanted to open a discount window to banks [which they did by 25 basis points after the Bear announcement] with a statement they were in control."

The Fed bailed out the Bush administration's complete negligence of the subprime and credit crisis. The Fed bailed out Hank Paulson's Treasury, the same Hank Paulson that presided for years as CEO over Goldman Sachs. The Fed covered its own ass.

Being forced to sell itself at a bargain-basement rate was not a bailout for Bear Stearns. A quick death is helpful to the perception of Washington's ability to control the mess of the markets, but that doesn't help the homeowners facing foreclosure or those whose economic futures remain uncertain, including many of the 14,000 Bear employees who had little to no control over the policies under which the entire banking system still operates.

Sadly, not a single lesson has been learned. The way to avert a credit crisis is to regulate its source. How low must we go before we curtail a credit monster borne of lax lending, packaging, leveraging, and trading? I fear we may find out.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

This over-the-weekend-orchestrated deal is unprecedented, absurd, and just plain crazy. This feels like the US's version of Yukos-Gazprom.
Posted by:MarcelMarch 18, 2008 4:17:14 PMRespond ^
It is a failure of the system, not just one firm. The government handed the good assets to Morgan, then took on the bad assets for the taxpayer, and helped 40 hedge funds, etc. not collapse. Why is our financial system so fragile that this idiocy can bring it down?

The taxpayer, represented by the Fed, could have driven a hard bargain. Instead the Fed acted with the interests of only Wall Street at heart.
It wasn't Bear employees, or the taxpayers.
Posted by:ElydogMarch 19, 2008 7:58:25 AMRespond ^
Forget this nonsense. It's just a distraction from the Obama campaign's instant death-blow to all racial inequality praise the lord. Economics? No longer necessary. Let them eat faith! lol what a world (strike that - what a country!)
Posted by:JustinMarch 19, 2008 10:22:52 AMRespond ^
"There is no WE in corruption"

http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2008/03/there-is-no-we.html

~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com

~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.

~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
Posted by:BlueBerry Pick'nMarch 19, 2008 1:17:07 PMRespond ^
The Fed didn't bail out the millions whose jobs were intentionally destroyed by Bush policies.
Posted by:SuzanneMarch 19, 2008 1:47:14 PMRespond ^
It may not have been a bail-out of Bear, but it was certainly a bail-out for "30 or 40 other firms, all hedge funds that borrow from us."

And alas, Eliot Spitzer, perhaps the only credible voice to call this for the insider's job that is has been effectively assassinated.

Perhaps just a coincidence,
perhaps not...
Posted by:Hal E. BurtonMarch 19, 2008 2:49:02 PMRespond ^
I have not heard one commentator make a connection between our current financial disaster and the Iraq war. They are inextricably tied together, you know.
Posted by:Al BrennerMarch 19, 2008 4:28:45 PMRespond ^
How is it that if you are a business owner with 500 employees and you manage it improperly, you simply cease to exist while if you are a firm of 14,000+ employees, you get government subsidies, with the justification being that the collapse would take numerous other companies with it? This is the sort of nonsensical, circular reasoning that we have been fed by the very institutions which are, by charter, charged with protecting the public interest. Not hedge fund owners or investment bankers, but the millions of taxpayers who are the backbone of this country. It's just maddening!
Posted by:BobMarch 19, 2008 4:38:42 PMRespond ^
"The taxpayer, represented by the Fed, could have driven a hard bargain."

how is the taxpayer represented by the fed? it's not a government entity, and it's certainly not made up of anyone that has ever been elected by anyone other than a board of directors. am i wrong?

our whole system is based on worthless paper made worthy by the words and promises of dishonest men, and although many know this, they prosper from it, and spread the gospel of the friendly fed. good luck, suckers.

o, wait, i'm stuck here, too...
Posted by:mayoMarch 19, 2008 5:52:27 PMRespond ^
I like what Al Brenner said. The war in Iraq is costing the American public their future. The only people who are going to profit from this `bail-out/merger' are the CEO's of the companies and politicans. The Press has been silenced corporations and politicans. George Orwell is rolling in his grave. The book `1984' should be required reading material in school, but unfortunatly our schools are only concerned with stardandized tests, not in helping our future adults learn how to think for themselves.
Posted by:Robert J GurzickMarch 19, 2008 6:10:52 PMRespond ^
Banks Gone Wild
Posted by:AnonMarch 19, 2008 6:38:59 PMRespond ^
It makes you long for the days of the
Savings and Loan debacle under Reagan.
Posted by:ThomasMarch 19, 2008 7:02:44 PMRespond ^
re: S&L Scandal
Remember old Silverado neil bush?
That particular fruit of oligarchic loins cost us 1.3 billion.
What does all this says for DNA?
Posted by:tomtelltruthMarch 19, 2008 8:28:42 PMRespond ^
If Bush would have approved SCHIP this would not have happened.
Posted by:JetMarch 20, 2008 12:37:05 AMRespond ^
Pardon me if I don't shed a tear for the employees at BS, or any Wall Street bankster that gets in trouble.
Posted by:edwardMarch 27, 2008 7:06:33 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS