MoJo Staffers Get LOST: A Weekly Chat

Photo courtesy ABC

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Last night, LOST kicked off its final season with a bang. Below, five Mother Jones staffers chat about Sayid’s resurrection, Hugo’s leadership abilities, Kate’s line-jumping, and what they hope the show’s enigmatic creators have in store for viewers.

Ben Buchwalter, Editorial Fellow: I’m in the chat room, reporting from 1974.
Nikki Gloudeman, New Media Fellow: Nice gchat entrance, Ben.
Jen Phillips, Assistant Editor: So what did you guys think? Did the first episode answer questions, or just frustrate you?
Nikki: I think they wanted to let fans know that they are going to give answers, by doing things like answering the smoke monster question right off the bat.
Ben: Yeah, this is a much better role for the actor formerly known as Locke.
Jen: I couldn’t take any more of Locke feeling sorry for himself. Terry O’Quinn makes an excellent badass. And he’s still got his knife!

Nikki: Favorite scene of the show? Mine was Jack and Locke rehashing their philosophical debate in the airport waiting room.
Ben: Hugo taking control and being a prophet.
Jen: Kate trying to steal a cab from Frogurt.

Jen: What do you think about Aaron? If he’s raised by someone else, will it mess things up? The psychic said Claire had to raise Aaron.
Nikki: Yes, he couldn’t be raised by “another” (or “an other”?) but why?!
Samantha Schaberg, Administrative Assistant: Isn’t Aaron the only child to be born on the island?
Nikki: What’s up with Aaron? Is he infant Jacob? He kinda looks like it. That’s my ridiculous theory of the chat!
 

Laurin Asdal, Director of Development: You know, my theory is, and this may be obvious, but when Juliet was dying and said “it worked,” I’m convinced everyone on the island will die and then they will assume their “plane didn’t crash” identities. That’s why they are telling parallel story lines.
Jen: Really? But why was Desmond on the plane? Because he never sailed to the island?
Laurin: That I can’t figure out. But he up and disappeared and he was the only person Jack recognized.
Nikki: Yes, actually there were a few key differences between what happened in the first episode [of the series] and the revised version [last night], which suggests the past before the parallel plane version is also different.
Jen: But even in new, non-crash timeline, characters are still meeting. Jack may help John, maybe Kate will still help birth Aaron…
Sam: Yes, they make the same choices.
Nikki: Will they actually make the same choices or will their subconscious knowledge of what happened on the island allow them to find redemption?
Laurin: They are destined to meet one way or the other. Hurley is totally Sawyer’s new mark.
Ben: Well, we know that the island doesn’t exist in this new timeline. But we also know that Jacob also probably exists, so maybe he’s bringing them together.

Sam: Are we sure that Jacob is the good in this?
Laurin: Well, he wears white linen.
Jen: And he weaves tapestries.
Ben: Seems like Jacob is good so far… which probably means he’s not. So is there a chance that Jacob and the man in black have a rivalry even without the island, and that Jacob is bringing everyone together in this parallel world?
Nikki: Oh that’d be interesting… so they exist in the world where the island is submerged too.
Laurin: They showed the man in black being angry with Jacob for allowing new visitors to the island.
Ben: The man in black constantly refers to setting people free by killing Jacob.
Jen: Right, so now that Jacob’s dead, it means we can all go on our merry ways, right? 😉
Sam: Jacob seems to still have that influence from the other side, he sent Hugo to the temple where Sayid was brought back to life.
Ben: Yeah was anyone surprised when Sayid came back to life?
Laurin: Not when multiple people can communicate with folks in the afterlife. What a handy talent. What do you think the substance is that protects people from the smoke monster? I found that hilarious.
Sam: Yes, I want to know what that is too, ashes of what?
Jen: Whatever they burned to make the ashes, it was big…
Nikki: It seems to be the same substance surrounding the scary cabin where Jacob resided. Some sort of ash to keep out—or in—non-corporeal entities. It would explain why the presence was trapped in the cabin, begging for help.
Laurin: Losties all, I wish I could continue but have a meeting. Too much good stuff. Cannot wait until next week! I love chatting with LOST fans. Dorking out is my favorite hobby!
Jen: Gah, okay one last one, what do you think of “the Others” now that you’ve seen them living in the temple?
Nikki: I keep thinking about what they kept saying a few seasons ago, “We’re the good guys.”
Sam: That’s my whole thing, I think everything we’ve been led to think is bad will be actually good.
Nikki: They seem to have some ancient power to keep watch over humanity, but they seem a little cranky to me.
Jen: Cranky and powerful. Sounds like the God of the Old Testament. Any last last thoughts before we end?
Ben: Sawyer: B-) man in black: x-( Locke: 🙁 Jack: 😐 Kate: :'(
Nikki: excellent! Maybe LOST is just based on emoticons. We’ve cracked the code! And with that, goodbye my fellow Losties. Until next week…namaste.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate