California Campaign Finance Reform

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Mother Jones already gave you twelve good reasons for campaign finance reform. Here’s just a few more:

  • Senate and House campaigns raised $447.7 million between 1/1/95 and 6/30/96, a 15% increase over the same period in the 1993-94 election cycle. (FEC 8/6/96)

  • Political action committees contributed $78 million to congressional candidates during the first 15 months of the 1995-96 cycle, a 12% increase. (FEC 6/7/96)

  • Corporate PACs contributed $30.7 million to 1996 congressional candidates — more than any other type of PAC. (FEC 6/7/96)

This year, two rival initiatives are fighting to get big money out of California politics. Both measures agree on banning contributions from lobbyists, the transfer of funds between candidates, and the accumulation of surplus campaign funds or “war chests.” But beyond such similarities, they present a tough choice for the reform-minded voter:

The California Political Reform Initiative The Anti-Corruption Act of 1996
Proposition # Proposition 208 Proposition 212
Sponsor Californians for Political Reform Californians Against Political Corruption
Basic Points Individuals, PACs, corporations, and unions limited to $25,000 total yearly contributions.

Contributions to a single candidate limited to $250 for most races, $500 for statewide offices (double for candidates who agree to spending limits).

Voluntary spending limits.

Individuals limited to $2,000 total yearly contributions. Other entities limited to $10,000.

Limits contributions from individuals, PACs, and parties to $100 for most races, $200 for statewide offices.

75% of a candidate’s money must come from within their district.

Mandatory spending limits.

Opposition Viewpoint Prop 208 is less than the major overhaul demanded and needed by Californians. Proposition 212’s $100 contribution limits, mandatory spending limits, and in-district contribution limits will be ruled unconstitutional, effecting no reform at all.

The Web sites for both Prop. 208 and Prop 212 have the full text (Prop. 208 | Prop 212) of their proposition and a host of links to relevant articles and non-profit groups, giving you the opportunity to decide for yourself which one you support.

Each also offer information on how you can volunteer (Prop. 208 | Prop 212), and who the local contactscolor> (Prop. 208 | Prop 212) are in your area.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate