Killer Grilles
The menacing metal bars attached to the front of many urban SUVs may make drivers feel like Crocodile Dundee -- but they also may pose a lethal danger to pedestrians.
The phenomenon is, quite literally, growing: SUVs are getting bigger, and as Americans' appetite for hulking off-road vehicles expands, so does their appetite for macho SUV accessories.
Marketed as Blazers, Trackers, Explorers, and Mountaineers , few SUVs are ever actually taken off-road; most are used for the same mundane errands that a traditional passenger car is bought for. Nonetheless, a growing number of SUV owners are taking their wilderness fantasy a bit further by buying "bull bars," or "grille guards," metal bars mounted on the vehicle's front. (The guards were invented in Australia, where they are affectionately called "roo bars," to protect a truck's front end in a collision with a kangaroo.) Some sets of bull bars are modest; others look big and elaborate enough to roast a sheep on.
But the fad could prove deadly -- not just to kangaroos, but to pedestrians. A growing body of research indicates the bars heighten the danger in car-on-pedestrian crashes, and have caused scores of avoidable injuries and several deaths in recent years.
There are no central statistics kept on bull-bar sales, since many are not sold by carmakers themselves but by auto-accessory dealers. As any city dweller can attest, however, the numbers are substantial. Armor Rex, a California auto-parts dealer, estimates that they alone sell 10,000 a year in the US.
When a normal passenger car hits an adult pedestrian, the person is run not over but under, sliding over the hood and windshield. It's not an experience most of us would envy, but experts say it's the least bad outcome. Something much more dangerous happens when a pedestrian is hit by the flat, rigid front of an SUV: The body is punched away from, then under the vehicle. And if the SUV has bull bars fitted to its radiator grille, this effect is intensified. The force of the collision is concentrated on the relatively small area of the grill's bars, meaning a relatively minor accident can have drastic consequences.
A 1998 study by Australia's University of Adelaide found that the damage to a child's head when struck by a vehicle equipped with a small-diameter steel bull bar was 10 to 15 times worse than damage inflicted by a vehicle without one. "In practical terms, a pedestrian hit by a vehicle equipped with a steel bull bar will be seriously hurt or killed at speeds much lower than those that are usually fatal," said Jack McLean, one of the study's authors.
"The bull bar concentrates and magnifies the force of the collision in a tiny area," British Member of Parliament Paul Flynn explained. "It's like a stiletto heel. They turn trivial accidents into serious ones, and serious accidents into fatal ones."
Since 1994, Flynn has helped lead a so-far unsuccessful campaign to ban bull bars in Britain and Europe, which was fuelled by several cases in which children were killed by SUVs equipped with bull bars travelling at speeds at which the collision wouldn't normally have been fatal.
"Research from Germany shows that 95 percent of children would be expected to survive the impact of a crash at about 20 miles per hour," Flynn told the British House of Commons in 1995, "but a vehicle fitted with bull bars would inflict life-threatening injuries on all children if it were travelling at 12 miles per hour, and that they could possibly die even at 10 miles per hour."
A study by the British government's own Transport Research Laboratory found that there were 40 additional serious injuries and at least two deaths attributable to bull bars in the UK in 1994, the year they were studying. A similar paper published in 1996 by Australia's Federal Office of Road Safety could not identify bull bars as the definitive cause of death, but found that they were probably involved in 20 percent of pedestrian deaths there.
Nonetheless, in North America, the potential danger posed by bull bars has so far drawn little attention. Part of the reason is that the US and Canada have fewer pedestrians than the UK. In both the US and Canada, pedestrians make up about 13 percent of traffic-related deaths, compared to 27 percent in the more densely populated UK. Unlike European governments, North American governments focus primarily on what happens to vehicle occupants when studying crash safety. And in fact, bull bars can actually minimize the damage to the other vehicle in a collision, by pushing the second car away like a snowplow, says Julie Rochman, spokesperson for the US-based Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Human bodies, however, are another story. "Depending on their design, it's certainly logical that it could be true" that bull bars pose an extra hazard to pedestrians, allowed Sara Tatchio, spokesperson for Ford Motor Company.
"At this point, it's not something that's become an issue in North America," said General Motors Canada spokesman Richard James. In the meantime, he said, GM is selling bull bars mainly to people who actually need them in the wilds. GM Canada's Web site, however, gives aesthetics equal billing with protection, and doesn't mention the wilderness at all. "Protect your grille from damage caused by low impacts while giving your vehicle a rugged look," the site tells potential SUV buyers checking out accessories.
Auto makers have resisted the idea of taking pedestrian safety into account for years, charged Joan Claybrook, who headed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration between l977 and l98l.
"Industry hates the idea because they don't want anything to interfere with their styling options," she said. "They believe that any regulation that limits the way that you can design the front end of a car ... could severely limit the way that they design the exterior of the car, which they view as being a critical factor in sales."
"It has in the past been difficult to balance designing attractive, appealing cars with pedestrian-safety issues," admitted Tatchio. But the company does take pedestrian safety into account, she insists, "and will even more in the future."
In other parts of the world, consumers are taking the alarming research to heart, spawning an unlikely cottage industry: faux bull bars. Australia's Team Poly is doing a brisk trade in bull bars made from soft, compressible plastic instead of metal, which now sell in more than 100 auto parts stores in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and some Asian countries.
North American car manufacturers might want to take note. If they don't start paying more attention to pedestrian-safety issues, predicts Barry Wellar, a University of Ottawa geography professor who specializes in traffic safety issues, "automobile companies are going to end up with the same kind of class-action suits as the tobacco companies."
I think this whole article sucks. Just ask yourself, WHERE ARE THE FACTS. A bull bar is only a piece of metal added to the grill or front end of a vehicle to improve looks, nothing more. They are no more dangerous to anything or anybody than a bumper on any vehicle. The person who wrote this article must be a nut case.
Steel bumpers have been original factory fit items to many off road vehicles for decades. As many of these vehicles sit considerably higher than standard cars the steel bumper is going to have the same impact result as a bull bar. So why all the fuss about bull bars and not steel bumpers?
What many critics don't take into account is the fact that when driving in most 4x4 vehicles the driver sits considerably higher than a regular car and therefore has a much greater field of view as they can see above any cars ahead making their chances of spotting potential accidents such as children by the road side much greater and in turn able to reduce speed or give a wider birth unlike many car drivers who can not see infront of leading or parked vehicles.
Just because some people disagree with the use of bull bars, they should not assume that the drivers of vehicles with them fitted are wreckless, careless or generally anti pedestrian.
We all do our best to avoid any impact with any pedestrians regardless of what we drive, we just have a better chance when we have better, higher forward visibility.
As an Advanced Motorcyclist, and a driver of over twenty years with zero accidents, I am well aware of forward visability and 360 degree observation and continuing that when driving any vehicle.
In fact, I feel far more in control and visually aware when driving my 4x4 than when driving my Girlfriends saloon car.
Finally, How about a bit more attention, time and effort being directed on educating our children in the art of how to cross roads safely. As children, we use to have the green cross code drilled into us by our parents, teachers and TV commercials.
No punn intended, but the responsibilty of road/pedestrian safety is a two way street!
HMMMM AFTER READING THE ARTICLE, I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE A COMPLETE BAN ON ANY VEHICLE THAT WILL CAUSE HARM TO OUR PRECISOUS CHILDREN! AFTER THAT, THEN LET'S TAKE ON THE NASTY ELECTRIC COMPANIES, BAN ELECTRICITY BECAUSE THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF CHIDREN THAT ARE "ELECTRIFRIED" EACH YEAR!
The bull bar on my car is made from plastic and is designed as in most cases to break in an impact with something .there is always someone who wants to ban something ,thats because of this liberal minded lefty government at the moment ruled by tosser minorities.The likes of Jeremy Vine and such portray 4x4 owners as irresponsible [deleted]s,its irresponsible louldmouthed second rate djs who have to much say thats the problem!!!!all this is about is anti 4x4 legislastion put in to motion by an unelected foreign prime minister Golden Brown.My Range Rover runs on bio diesel and maintains 30-40mpg on a run I bet that beats GBs Jag?The person who wrote this should live and let live and stop trying to ban every bloody thing.
People are seriously injured and killed every day by cars so why make this more of a risk by putting a metal bull bar on your vehicle.concept mouldings in wolverhampton can change this with their new endura frontal protection system which is fitted to a car similar to a bull bar but makes pedestrians a lot safer. call 01902 450902 for more information
is doing science coursework and this isnt helping :(
BOREDDD!
This is a pretty stupid fu(king article. I mean, it's not even all original. Some of it is copy and paste from another website.
Also, if you're going to hit your head on the corner of a steel bumper, you're not going to have a different injury if you hit your head on a bar instead.
There are a lot of bars on a bull bar as well, so the impact is still spread out.
My car has a very square front bumper, and no matter what you hit on it or where, you're going to have a big problem. It's flat as a board and square as a box. Gotta love the '70's.
I was struck by an suv with huge bull bars in 2004. A car was turning several cars up and I was stopped on the road. Traffic went by at about 45-50 mph on the 4 lane street, 2 lanes each direction. A driver came up fast behind me and moved to the other lane. The Suv driver behind him was on his cell phone and didn't see me until just a second before impact.
All he had time to do was try to swerve. He hit me, (with a big 3" Bull Bar), pushed me into the car in front of me, and I careened into oncoming traffic unconscious. Fortunately no one hit me oncoming. I am still suffering from the severe double whiplash, damage to my neck, hands, spine, and nerves as a result.
If I didn't have a 960 Volvo one of the safest cars in the world, I'd be dead. enough said? And don't answer me with "it was the cell phone". I don't want to hear it. And that person's insurance company isn't settling or paying any damages. I lost my job because I couldn't work, I lost my insurance, and now I'm screwed and their insurance is trying to hide the fact the driver had Bull-Bars.
re
Bull-bars
I drive a new 4x4 Ford Ranger c/w a big bull bar which cost me a lot of money so if some idiot walks into my vech he better be dead otherwise I will sue the pants off him or her.I have been driving for over 40 yrs without an incident but have had a few near misses with pedestrians as they walk on the wrong side of the road and normally at night with dark clothing and they are normally of dark color themselves so they are looking for trouble.People who pick on 4x4's/bull bars etc are normally poor and cannot afford one so most time it's a case of jelousy
I am hoping for a new
I am hoping for a new organisation framed of the genuine things and
following humanitarian things.After all, its all about treating others
the way you want to be treated yourself in the same situation – unless
all truths have been utterly abandoned.
have a great day
Have a great day!If you want choose replica watch and tiffany jewelry or uggs please chlick here
tiffany and co
tiffany jewellery
fashion jewelry.
swiss replica watch
replica rolex watch
uggs
women ugg boots
Ugg
wallets
cheap bags



























