Home Sour Home
What happens when a Republican homemaker goes up against an elusive construction company, a faceless bureaucracy, and the whole housing-industrial complex?
For Jordan Fogal, that service felt more like a kind of torture. There were times when she was so "flusterated" by her builder's emissaries, she wanted to "just grab them and choke them till their eyeballs pop out." The company completed some repairs, such as the drain in the whirlpool and the upside-down window, but more often the routine went like this: Jordan would report a problem, Stature would decline to help, and she would decline to accept that they would not help: "How dare you," she'd write in one of many, many letters. Eventually, an appointment would be made for an inspection, but then no one would show. Jordan would call and be told the inspector was coming the next day at 8 a.m., and then, at the appointed time, she would be told that they were coming at 2 p.m. Again she would wait, and they wouldn't come but would later insist they had and that no one had been home. When the builders' inspector finally did appear, Jordan would be told that the water spots were just paint curing, that there was no mildew, that the rust-streaked cracks in the stucco were just settlement cracks. "They would talk to me as if I were an illiterate, inferior, stupid woman who didn't understand constructionand I didn't. But I knew water was running out of my house, and the Scarecrow could have known that without his brain."
The Fogals hired their own inspectors, who found serious roofing problems and "widespread and growing accumulation of moisture" in walls and ceilings; when one inspector drilled a hole in the wall, she recalls, water came draining out, and rotten wood was on the bit. An estimate for the full repair of the Fogals' house would be put at $199,900. In April 2004, Casimiro offered repairs, which, nine months later, Thibodeau told the Houston Chronicle were worth between $2,000 and $5,000.
With her homebuyers' contract forbidding her from suing, Jordan filed a complaint against Tremont with the Better Business Bureau. The BBB said Tremont Homes was "doing business as" Stature but that Stature was no longer in business, according to Jordan, so the bureau couldn't help. She filed claims under her homebuyers' warranty (which turned her down for not following proper procedure), under her homeowners' insurance (which rejected her because its inspector found the house "deviates from the industry standards"), and under Stature's liability insurance (which said that it would cover property damaged by "these construction defects," but not the defects themselves). Jordan went to the district attorney's office, the state attorney general, the Texas Department of Insurancenothing.
"No one understood what you were talking about, or they were just no help," Jordan says. "I had no one to talk to in the beginning, not even my husband."
At night, Bob would tell her she was simply exaggerating; it couldn't be as bad as all that. He's "very patriotic," she explains, and he couldn't accept that "in America, land of the free, home of the brave, no one would help, especially when you didn't do anything wrong." Jordan tried to tell him that "Texas is just like a communist state: You expect to have somewhere to go with your problem, but there's nowhere to go."
She went again to her builder. She carried with her the report of yet another inspection, and perhaps it was clear that she just might convince a jury. Thibodeau, in any case, said he would fix her house. But a week passed. And now mold was taking over, spotting the carpet, outlining pictures on the wall. Jordan read on the Internet that certain molds could cause brain abscesses and inhibit cell division, that her home was now not merely uncomfortable but, according to her doctor, unsafe.
In this frame of mind, she wrote Thibodeau, "Do we have to die?" He didn't answer.
At about that time, in September, HOBB's Ahmad connected Jordan with another Houston homeowner, Carla Bistrick, whose experience was so similar to hers, Bistrick finally asked Jordan where she lived. "Oh my God!" Bistrick exclaimed, for she, too, had been the owner of a house in Hyde Park Crescent. It, too, had filled with water. Only after Bistrick began giving tours to prospective buyers in the neighborhood had she convinced the builderjust before the Fogals arrivedto buy back her house.
Bistrick had one more bit of news for Jordan: In making her case, she had photographed homes in the neighborhood, including unit No. 34, which appeared to have mold and water damage and, though brand new, was already under repair. The Fogals' house, their beautiful house, had been infested even before she bought it.
Jordan immediately dialed Thibodeau. She was crying as she demanded he buy back her house, too. "You knew what you were doing when you sold us this house."
Thibodeau replied that buying houses was really not his particular game, and then he did what probably no one should ever do to Jordan Fogal. He hung up.
LAWYERS FOR CASIMIRO and Thibodeau were reluctant to speak to Mother Jones. "The commitment to social justice," explained Thibodeau's attorney Charles Turet, "is something that gives lawyers heartburnnot that we don't like social justice," he was quick to add. "But there's a theme there that's"he paused again"unfavorable to corporate clients."
Casimiro would not return phone calls; Thibodeau did, but was at first disinclined to speak. "Put it this way," he said, "I'm a builder, and I don't expect to be treated fairly by any media, because it's always poor consumer.'"
There were, in fact, a number of Thibodeau customers who considered themselves poor consumers. Last year, four of the buyers in the Fogals' 44-home subdivision gathered in a lawsuit, all alleging the builder "did not install flashing at critical locations," with an "enormous amount of resulting damage." Other neighbors found water in their homes but chose to pay for leak repairs themselves, because it didn't seem worth a fight, and Kerri Kirsch's family, who also found rain pouring in, fled in disgust to Arizona after a long legal battle with Casimiro.
Jordan didn't join the lawsuit, but she had no intention of surrendering to Thibodeau. "I wanted to show him," she says, "that no matter what he did to me, I was not going away."
And so, on that September day, about 10 minutes after hanging up on Jordan Fogal, Thibodeau received another call. It was a national consumer radio show, live on the air, wanting to know just what he had done to poor Mrs. Fogal.
That was just the beginning. Having moved to the apartment, taking the $368,564 mortgage with her, Jordan dedicated her life to exposing "the greatest travesty of justice" she had ever seen. "Home Builder Makes Home Buyer Homeless," her message went. And everything that had happened to her, everything she learned, she disseminated to anyone who might listenreporters, the mayor, her state representatives, even the president of the United States. When she found out that a judge, to whose campaign Casimiro had contributed, had appointed Casimiro to three county boards, including the housing authority, she printed up fliers. She spoke at homeowners' rallies and before the Houston City Council. She showed the council pictures of the subdivision, described the mold and rotting materials, and explained how her builder appeared to be not a single company but a dozen.
Perhaps nothing she did had more effect than her regular appearance in front of the builders' new luxury condos, Tremont Tower. In her Chanel sunglasses and pink sweater, Jordan stood with pictures of her rotting house, a basket of lemons, and a sign that read, "Beware! Tremont Homes sold me a lemon!" Watching her on the corner in protest, Bob finally understood "why I hate arguing with that woman."
At first, she experienced a loneliness like she had never known. Neighbors, fretting over their property values, ceased to speak to her. Bob wouldn't join her. Every weekend afternooneven Christmas and New Year's and several times in the rainJordan stood alone on the corner. She was initially afraid of the people she met out theresome black, some gay, some tattooed and piercedbut gradually realized that they were "some of the nicest people."
Our builder threatens us with a lawsuit for speaking to the Building and Development in our county. We know they have no ground on the lawsuit, but they could drain us financially.
Thank you for attention to this bad business. I waqs just 10 seconds away from signing a new home contract with the Mandatory Arbitration clause...
A point should be made. It appears that about 15% of the houses are really bad..so 85 houses are ok...but heaven help the buyers of the other 15 houses. Really big losses, not only the house, legal fees, loss of domicile, loss of money, but also all those "consequent" damages that are denied, your furnoishings, your photos, your heritage keepsakes. And most of all your self respect due you in justice.
If it didn't matter, and I have asked new home builders, just remove that mandatory arbitration clause from the contract, and I will trust the American civil courts open justice. They refuse.
Genevieve Lesiak Rhode Island. I almost bought new home in Florida...4 years ago. I find the same story in new home contracts from large buiders here, too.
I will wait and buy from a reseller and have complete inspections done even if its a month old.
If I could be of help in your quest for justice I would. I am in the process of fighting with Perry Homes for misrepresenting the town home I purchased (built from the ground up). I do not have the funds that Perry has or the connections in politics, but misrepresentation is mirepresentation no matter who does it.
I wish you the best.
I am a Lennar homeowner living a similar nightmare. I bought my nightmare in Commerce City colorado 1 year ago, and have just got the go ahead for mediation. Numerous water leaks, improper electrical wiring, missing support pole(22 feet unsupported home-18 feet is the max amount alloted) missing insulation, incomplete duct work, $742 water bill not paid by Lennar that I had to pay to prevent a lien against me and also stop the water from being turned off. Lennar has some serious issues as published in defectivehomes.com. Their promise to outstanding quailty and customer care is a joke. Not only should we hold homebuilders accountable, but also the city for their failed inspections. We as customers should have a voice to expose these homebuilders who have cut corners to make a profit. My Lennar Lemon should be demolished and my investment returned. Lennar has a double standard. Their executives would not accept this shoddy construction but expect us to feel safe and secure in our investment. Lennar needs to be exposed for their lack of integrity and ownership to their homeowners. Their profits are falling as is the number of home sales. With further exposure they will have to own up to their inequities and either provide the quality they promise or continue to lose the home sales resulting in declining profits.
At present my family is 5 years into litigation with our home builder TK Constructors, who build in Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. I am a Realtor and that title means that I represent my clients best interest. Arbitration takes away civil rights and that is not in the best interest of anyone. All the while realizing that I am not an attorney but I wouldn't advise signing builder contracts without first taking the contract to your lawyer so that he can explain exactly what you are getting yourself into. My brother n law who is also involved is a paralyzed veteran, whos' dreams have also been shattered. He was supposed to build on the land also but instead of building he's funding a lawsuit. We are both heading to Washington for the press conference in July. Whatever it takes, but this is consumer abuse and must be quickly delt with and ended. Our lives are in limbo, ever since about two months after moving in we saw water entering over the sill plate and in an instant my heart sank as I knew this was very bad. My children have suffered at the hands of my builder for 5 long years and we just want it over and behind us.
I was just on a Jury where SCI was suing the roofer in the Hyde Park project (Aztec Roofing) It seemed very early in the trial that SCI was a very poor home builder. They want to blame others for not over seeing a proper project. While it appeared that all the roofing companies were sub standard, the lack of care on the part of SCI was inexcusable.
Very BAD People, concerned with just more money.
Sadly, the Fogals also suffered from an acute case of Republican Syndrome. RS can be recognized by a number of symptoms.
Chief among these is a lack of empathy, or the inability to put oneself in another person's shoes. This leads to a lifetime of making selfish choices, often characterized by harshly punitive measures aimed at those who are "so stupid that they are getting what they deserve".
Most sufferers of RS never gain awareness of their ailment until they are personally afflicted by the results of their prior choices, and votes.
Put more simply, the Fogals are living in the world they voted for and now they don't like it. Ms. Fogal speaks approvingly of her racist ancestors. I'm sure she never thought that she herself would someday be in the position of a powerless minority, a victim of people with more power, privilege and money than she has.
We are dealing with the same situation in NC except our home was an existing home and we discovered the water intrusion problems after only two weeks of living in the house. We are now in an apartment and the mortgage company is trying to force us into foreclosure since we can't afford litigation at over $100,000 legal fees and only a 5% chance to win as per attorneys we have spoken with. It astonishes us that there are no "lemon laws" for houses. It isn't fair that our builder is still able to build by just changing his company name and was not required to carry insurance while he built our home to cover builder defects. It also isn't sure that homeowner's insurance companies can get out of paying anything in these situations, that's why we have insurance at the outragous rates they charge. It isn't fair to our children to have to live in a tiny apartment with none of their belongings because everything we own is contaminated with mold spores! There has to be a way through this without destroying our credit, where is the justice?
We are dealing with the same situation in NC except our home was an existing home and we discovered the water intrusion problems after only two weeks of living in the house. We are now in an apartment and the mortgage company is trying to force us into foreclosure since we can't afford litigation at over $100,000 legal fees and only a 5% chance to win as per attorneys we have spoken with. It astonishes us that there are no "lemon laws" for houses. It isn't fair that our builder is still able to build by just changing his company name and was not required to carry insurance while he built our home to cover builder defects. It also isn't fair that homeowner's insurance companies can get out of paying anything in these situations, that's why we have insurance at the outragous rates they charge. It isn't fair to our children to have to live in a tiny apartment with none of their belongings because everything we own is contaminated with mold spores! There has to be a way through this without destroying our credit, where is the justice?
This artical was clearly written from a political point of view. Calling her a republican, hitting Mr. Perry, calling the TRCC a builder lead group,..., it is not a balanced artical, period.
well said - the horrors of an unjust society where the right to trial by jury is taken away and only the fat cats have the remaining tools- Clearly an indictment of the Republican party's un-American--justice "for sale" ways- and Texas is their playground!
Shoddy Construction - Everyone Pays Except those with Sovereign Immunity
What do you call 50 plus Connecticut Building Code Violations, water coming through your garage for months on end, ice 4 plus inches thick on your driveway, septic vent pipe venting into an attic, open junction boxes and getting called ignorant or threatened by Portland, CT Official? We call is Collins Hell.
8/22/07, Maya Roney wrote an article discussing the issues of shoddy construction and how this is impacting homeowners. I can speak of this issue first hand.
We purchased our brand new home in September, 2003 only to find out that it was built by an unlicensed builder and the home was not inspected prior to the CO being issued.
We have a brand new home that is riddled with code violations (over 50 documented Connecticut State Building Code violations) that present safety issues. The cost to fix these ticking time bombs? Over $100, 000.
While we have sued the unlicensed builder and have a judgment against him – collecting is another story.
We are currently suing the Town of Portland, CT as well as the Public Works Director and the Ex-Building Official (who resigned and then went to work as the Building Official in a neighboring town).
We were lied to, threatened, and now the town’s employee’s are claiming sovereign immunity. So in other words, it’s ok not to do you job and put people at risk. It's ok for them not to do their jobs, but we still have to pay our sky high taxes and suck up the damages that were caused by their gross AND I MEAN GROSS NEGLIGENCE.
Everything we have is documented to the letter. What did we do wrong other than expect to have the home of our dreams? We can't afford to pay for our house twice. Why do shoddy builders and shady town officials get away with this??
To learn more about our story, visit www.collinshell.com
Lennar Nightmares...here are countless stories..www.huttoparke.com
I have first hand knowledge of this case and can tell you it is racially motivated. She reference this herself in arogant manner with her own statement, ." It's a picture of several old men—her great-uncles from Alabama. They decided that until the South rose again, they would never shave their beards. "And they were all buried with very long beards." When Ms. Fogal discovered that her builder are Jewish and Hispanic she became in raged. She then began her quest.
This is what happens when the house you buy its build SCAB/Rat. Low paying job or piece work. The faster you build it, the faster you can cash your money. This is why we should support Unions and defeat Right to Work Laws. Not good for Americans
Anyone that buys a house in a developement from a mass builder is taking a big risk.If you can actually afford several hundred thousand dollars you are probably better off in the long run hiring your own architect and contractor.
IT WAS A MISMATCH from the start—one mad-as-hell housewife against the entire construction-industrial complex. Home-building is a chief indicator of the economy's health, and politicians are rarely inclined to slow it down with regulation or oversight. Reinforcing that impulse is an extremely well-funded, organized builder lobby whose focus, according to Janet Ahmad of the watchdog group HomeOwners for Better Building (HOBB), has never been "on how to build a house correctly, but on how to limit regulations and liability."
Isn't this the Republican philosophy, government can't actually do anything, let the "free market" solve the problems, and the lawyers don't need to get involved, at least not on the side of regular citizens but the corporations can have and use them all they want, because their frivilous lawsuits just drive up the cost of everything.
I was recently shopping for a condominium in the Houston area and had particular interest in the
Tremont Tower, however, after reading this piece I will obviously stike it from my list possibilities. It's beyond me that these men aren't in jail. What's more baffling is why they wouldn't build a sound product in the first place and avoid all of this arbitrary headache while nurturing a continually growing positive business and constuction reputation. Is all these cutting corners and cheating really worth it? I don't know where they learned business, but it's obvios they wouldn't survive in the world of big time, international commerce with this approach. I hope they get what they deserve and I will certainly avoid any of their products in the future.
Now my builder is suing me for the bad house that he sould me look for no help from the state builder the state loves home onwers they dont love we dont pay the lobbiest my house is built by Choice Homes was a bad choice on my part
Excellent article. Any update/ How can issue be legally changed to true legal justice/?
Sad that you would think that you have first hand knowledge of this. Please learn your history and quit thinking everything is about race.
Sounds like a disgruntled evil democrat who doesn't know what it means to work all your life to just see it go down the drain because there are no standards....something the demoncrats know all too well. NO standards.



























