The Cheese Bomb Incident: Terror and the TSA
News of terrorists testing our airports is scary?but at least two of the so-called "dry runs" involved innocent hunks of cheese.
Sara Weiss was flying home to Long Island after visiting her son in San Diego for the Fourth of July. On her way out to California, Transportation Security Administration (tsa) inspectors at jfk Airport had questioned Weiss about four old, heavily patched ice packs in her carry-on baggage, so she put them into her checked suitcase for the return trip. She passed through security without incident, but as she was boarding, a ticket agent asked Weiss to step out of line. Three police officers escorted her to the basement, where checked baggage is inspected.
San Diego tsa and Harbor Police interrogated Weiss for three hours. The first question they asked was, "Do you know Osama bin Laden?" They told her that their scanning equipment "went crazy" when her suitcase passed through, that her ice packs contained a "clay-like substance" similar to "what terrorists use to implant explosives," and that "the tape all along the edges of the ice packs suggests to us they were tampered with." Their suspicions were heightened after they searched her carry-on bag and found that Weiss (who works for the nonprofit Long Island Council of Churches and is herself Jewish) had a report on Muslim Americans.
After a hazmat team determined the ice packs were, in fact, ice packs, Weiss was released. But for some reason, the whole episode was included in the tsa's weekly Suspicious Incidents Report and then highlighted as the first item in an internal tsa memo issued to security screeners on July 20 and headlined "Incidents at U.S. Airports May Suggest Possible Pre-Attack Probing." The memo also detailed three other incidents that might "indicate terrorists are conducting pre-attack security probes and 'dry runs' similar to dress rehearsals."
These other incidents involved the discovery of "several items at airports resembling improvised explosive device (ied) components": a carry-on bag in Milwaukee containing "a wire coil wrapped around a possible initiator, an electrical switch, batteries, three tubes, and two blocks of cheese"; a checked bag in Houston containing "a plastic bag with a 9-volt battery, wires, a block of brown clay-like minerals, and pipes"; and another checked bag in Baltimore containing "a plastic bag with a block of processed cheese taped to another plastic bag holding a cellular phone charger." At the bottom of each page of the memo, set in boldface type, was the same admonition: "No portion of this report should be furnished to the media, either in written or verbal form."
But just days later, on July 24, Brian Williams announced on nbc Nightly News that a document—"obtained tonight"—cautioned airport officials to be on alert for "terrorists [who] may be staging a kind of dry run, rehearsing for more attacks on commercial airliners." cnn ran a similar story on its website less than two hours later, saying that it had "obtained the advisory from a government source." The Associated Press picked up the story, which ran the next day in newspapers across the country.
The tsa issued a statement calling for calm, but the 24-hour commentariat would have none of it. cnn Headline News' Glenn Beck, for example, denounced the tsa's backpedaling as "bull crap" and declared the original report "a new reason for you to be terrified to fly this summer." Yes, despite explicit instructions not to panic, it was clearly time for us to panic. And the thought of terrorists conducting dry runs to test our airport security is scary—very scary—but remember that at least one of these incidents involved Sara Weiss, a self-described "66-year-old woman with a bad back."
On July 25, a colleague who knew of Weiss' brush with security called her at home. "Sara, you were on abc tonight," she said. "You're famous." She explained that Charlie Gibson had described an incident at the San Diego airport involving "a woman in her 60s with ice packs." As Weiss told Mother Jones, "after we finished talking, I wondered, 'How did they find out about that? I must be on a watch list.' That made me angry because I'd been exonerated. So I called abc, told them I was the woman to whom Charlie Gibson had referred."
abc quickly dispatched Lisa Stark and a film crew to interview Weiss. Ten minutes before her story aired on July 26, Weiss received a call from Stark informing her that Kip Hawley, the head of the tsa, wanted to apologize and to give "some background information on why it happened." When they spoke—Weiss says, "I had to sort of coax an apology from him, but yes, he did apologize"—Hawley said it had been "a learning experience."
But closer scrutiny revealed the rest of the tsa memo was just as thin. Of the incident at bwi, Corporal Jonathan Green, a spokesman for the Maryland Transportation Authority Police, told the Washington Post that "the cheese and the charger were not a threat." Houston Police Department spokesman Victor Senties told the Houston Chronicle of the incident there, "If there had been any threat at the time, we would not have let the passengers board the plane."
Finally, tsa officials conceded that none of the incidents in the memo were quite as ominous as they sounded; that none of the investigations were, in fact, ongoing, as the original report claimed; and that none of the airports had closed down any terminals, though the memo claimed that "some" had. Less than three days after the initial nbc report, the entire story had been debunked.
Now, nobody wants to be the guy who lets the next Mohammed Atta sail through security, so maybe each of these tsa episodes can be chalked up to overzealousness or even proper zealousness. But the real question remains unanswered: Why was a bogus report—based on false alarms as old as 10 months—delivered by "a government source" to nbc and cnn for broadcast on the evening of July 24?
In answering that question, it is helpful to remember the administration's history of conveniently timing the release of sensational terror threats. Think back to June 2002: As fbi whistleblower Coleen Rowley was set to testify before the Senate on pre-9/11 intelligence failures, John Ashcroft suddenly rigged up a satellite feed from Moscow to announce the arrest of Jose Padilla, which had actually occurred a month earlier. Ashcroft's stunt successfully preempted Rowley's testimony on many networks. Even today, it's not uncommon for a terror threat to pop up just as the administration faces a political or pr challenge. (See "Wag the dhs," below.)
Wag the DHS
|
incident, date |
what they announced |
Coincidence? |
|---|---|---|
|
Blue Alert #1 |
Al Qaeda "moving forward" with plans for large-scale U.S. attacks. |
Two days after Kerry's VP pick produces bump in polls |
|
Blue Alert #2 |
Arrest of terrorist Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, nabbed 5 days earlier. |
Day after John Kerry's convention speech |
|
Blue Alert #3 |
Pending attacks on nyc banks. Threat level raised to orange. |
Just after Democratic convention |
|
Sears Tower |
fbi chief tells Larry King of Black Muslim plot against tower; later calls plot merely "aspirational." |
Day that nyt reports government searching Americans' bank records. |
|
Holland Tunnel |
Plot to blow up nyc tunnel; arrest made more than 2 months prior. |
Anniversary of London bombing |
|
Chertoff's Gut |
dhs head says he has a bad feeling; cheese bomb threats leaked two weeks later. |
Day that Bush dusts off Iraq-9/11 "link" to boost support for surge. |
So it's worth noting that the very afternoon that the tsa memo was leaked, President Bush had delivered a speech at the Charleston Air Force Base in South Carolina with the hope of ginning up support for the Iraq War. Chief among his new arguments was that Al Qaeda in Iraq was little more than a front for bin Laden's Al Qaeda and, thus, withdrawal of our troops would threaten American security: "The facts are that Al Qaeda terrorists killed Americans on 9/11; they're fighting us in Iraq and across the world, and they are plotting to kill Americans here at home again." The White House characterized the speech as a "surge of facts," though congressional Democrats were quick to point out that, in fact, the president had declined to provide details on the basis for his claims. Senator John Kerry said that Bush was simply "trying to scare the American people" into supporting the war.
Within hours, nbc and cnn had the internal tsa memo in hand and were reporting it—without checking any of its claims. You would think that after being fooled by tales of mobile weapons labs, yellowcake uranium, and aluminum tubes, the media would treat such tales with a bit more skepticism. This memo never should have passed the sniff test; why on earth would tsa release cheese bombers it believed to be Al Qaeda and allow them to continue on their merry way?
A single day of real reporting would have revealed holes in the initial memo and prevented widespread reports of an impending attack. It also should have raised more serious questions—still unanswered—about who authored the memo, who leaked it, and why. But the closest anyone came to a mea culpa was cnn Saturday Morning anchor T.J. Holmes, who kicked off the July 28 broadcast by saying, "You should remember all that talk earlier this week about the terrorist dry runs at airports here in the U.S. Well, just kidding!"
Fascinating. Those bastards took my toothpaste yesterday. I'm not happy about it.
Serves you right - don't you know toothpaste is a dangerous weapon?
Hey, have you ever squeezed too hard and got toothpaste in your eyes? It could be used to disable a flight attendant momentarily. Pens are much more lethal, however.
I had a toothpaste tube confiscated, too...
but when they found a bottle of water in my backpack and asked me to throw it away, I motioned like a threw it out and then stuck it back in my pants pocket...all completely unnoticed by TSA, of course....
I find it deeply disturbing that as an American citizen with no criminal record, my bags are searched by TSA. To me, that falls into the "unreasonable search and seizure" category.
Shoelaces: can be used to garrote flight attendants to negotiate admittance into cockpit.
Belts: likewise.
Pens: in your eye.
Clothes: can be used to restrain flight attendants.
Laptops: can be used as blunt objects. Also, lithium batteries can be made to explode.
Knees, elbows, and heads: can be used as objects of attack...
Seriously -- anything, including information, can be used as a weapon. The fact that we have not had another 9/11 cannot be put down to keeping all hazardous materials off the airlines, because that hasn't happened. What's made most of the difference is us "terrorizing" the "terrorists" by making them afraid to try. The problem is that we travelers have to pay the price for such a show by letting TSA get in our hair over harmless stuff.
But letting our government stampede us at will, by leaking scare stories to the press, is as much to say that truth no longer matters. What matters is controlling public perception.
Usually, "if it smells like bull[deleted], it is bull[deleted]!"
the government under control of republicans gives expanded media ownership rights to a handful of wealthy pro republican media moguls. the media moguls show their appreciation to the republicans in power by spinning anything that is beneficial to the administration. quite simple. i believe that the reason AT&T and the other communications giants were so willing to co-operate with the government on the public spying program was to show the government how much they could do to both monitor the population, but control the flow of information. when the chinese had their uprising in tianamen square all governments on this planet saw first hand the power of the internet in getting information out to the rest of the world. it was not a lesson that was lost to them.
a few years ago my mom went down with a brain aneurism in Texas where she was living. all 7 of us kids flew to her bedside coming from Australia, New York, Virginia, and Indiana. She never awoke from the surgery. one of my brothers asked for a lock of hair at the hospital and the staff supplied him with a plastic bag and scissors to clip a lock with. when we returned tto our homes we flew out of Dallas/Ft Worth. my brother was called away to be interrogated about the lock of hair in his checked baggage because it was a pre-printed labeled bag that said "human remains". it was the only type of bag the hospital had. the TSA were concerned that it was impregnated with a contaigon that was to be spread. it was fortunate that we all had copies of mom's death certificate to prove his story of what it was. even so, all of us were pulled out of line and made to empty out pockets, turn them inside out, remove our shoes, and get patted down. my sister had her purse empties and completely rifeld through. and i mean completely. they removed every piece of paper from her wallet and unfolded each individually. every photo was removed. even her tampons were checked for signs the wrapper had been tampered with. my billfold suffed the same fate; every bill was individually inspecet, every pocket had every buisiness card removed and individually inspected. it was unreal. i also had a pack of cigarette papers and the rifled through each leaf. i though that would lead to a strip search for me but it didn't. it made me decide right then that i would never fly again unless drive time to my destination was unreasonable. and things are supposedly stricter now.
So our government, under republican control, has become a modern version of Hitler's despicable regime. How are Bush and Chaney still in office? Wnd how much more damage are they going to do.
I've listened to '99 Red Balloons' recently, and Bush's war is exactly what it's talking about - destroy something before you even look for a reason.
If you're a member of a peace or human rights group you're sure to get extra scrutiny, despite the fact that their ideology is antithetical to terrorism. It's political harrassment by the Vaterland Security Department, pure and simple.
The TSA admits that known terrorists are not on the "no fly list" because the government doesn't want to "tip off" suspected terrorists. That means that the only people on the list are those they know not to be terrorists and the high profile terrorists that know they are on the list. How cool is that?
Also, why do they allow someone on the list, someone they claim is so dangerous that they can't be let on a plane, return to the community? I mean,how can someone that is too dangerous to be allowed on a plane be sent right back into the community where they could blow up a school or shoot up a mall?
I know I'm being ridiculous in my example there but it does make you think.
Finally, I believe that this is just harassment, pure and simple. They do it just to let us know that we are powerless to stop it. ID implants are next! and what are the cowards that allow themselves to be mistreated by their own government every time they fly gonna do about it? Nothing! They've already accepted far worse.
Seig Heil!
Halt! Willkommen to America, please display your large yellow star at all times. Can I see your identification papers please? Now strip and squat in a good German fashion,etc etc etc. Not a good look, guys...
Security Theatre at its best.
What about martial artists? I hold belts in several disciplines. Should I be allowed on a plane?



























