MoJo Video: The Ex-Gitmo Detainee Next Door
If freed by a federal court, 17 Uighurs imprisoned at Gitmo may find new homes in northern Virginia. What will the neighbors think?
In 2001, about two dozen Uighurs who had left China were living in a camp in Afghanistan, where some were waiting for visas that would allow them to travel to Turkey, a country they had heard would grant them political asylum. Some of the men would later acknowledge they had indeed gone for military training to help their countrymen fight the Chinese, though the extent of their training proved to be minimal at best. When the US government invaded, the Uighur camp was bombed and the men fled to Pakistan, where bounty hunters turned them over to the US military for $5,000 a person.
The military transferred the men to Guantanamo Bay in 2002, where they've been ever since. To justify the Uighurs' detention, the Pentagon has accused them of being members of the East Turkistan Islamic Movement, which it alleged was connected to Al Qaeda. The military also claimed that the Uighurs had received military training sponsored by the Taliban or Al Qaeda while in Afghanistan. US military officials allowed Chinese officials to interrogate the Uighurs after they had been "softened up" with sleep deprivation techniques decried as a form of torture. Later, in 2004, the Pentagon officially designated the Uighurs enemy combatants, even though there had already been talk about releasing them.
By 2005, the Pentagon had concluded that the Uighurs were not terrorists and should be released. But if the US sent the Uighurs back to China, they were likely to be persecuted. So the State Department set to work trying to find them a home elsewhere. But after all the publicity about the Guantanamo detainees and their alleged threat to humanity, no country would take them. The Uighurs continued to languish at Guantanamo, where the military has denied most of them contact with their families back home.
Meanwhile, lawyers had begun to challenge the Uighurs' detention in federal court. In 2006, three days before oral arguments in their case, the US released five Uighur detainees and sent them to a refugee camp in Albania, where they languished for nearly two years. (One has since been able to move to Sweden, where he had family; the other four now live in apartments and work in a pizza parlor, according to their lawyer, Sabin Willett.) The move prompted a diplomatic crisis between Albania and China, which had been demanding that the US send the Uighurs back to China. Albania refused to take anymore Uighurs, and the Chinese government started to make veiled threats of trade sanctions to other countries, including Germany, that the US had approached to take the rest of the Uighurs. So the remaining 17 Uighurs have been stuck at Guantanamo, still in prison, waiting for the State Department to find them a home.
In the end, it could be the great American melting pot that comes through for the Uighurs. Members of northern Virginia's Uighur community have volunteered to take in the detainees if they are released into the US. When the 17 remaining Uighur detainees petitioned the court for their release, they included a US resettlement plan as part of their argument that the US could no longer justify their indefinite detention now that there was somewhere they could safely go. The proposal apparently played a significant role in Urbina's decision in October to order the detainees freed. The Justice Department, however, has vigorously resisted releasing the Uighurs into the US. As Willett, the lawyer representing the Uighur detainees says, "It's all a desperate rearguard action to make sure the Uighurs never show up on 60 Minutes."
Depending on how the DC Appellate Court responds to Monday's arguments, Ilshat Hassan could soon have a new roommate. A member of the Uyghur American Association (the UAA uses an alternative spelling of Uighur), Hassan had been a teacher for 15 years in China before he came to the United States and received political asylum. The Booz-Allen "administrative professional" lives in an apartment in McLean, Virginia, where he has volunteered to take in one of the detainees, teach him English, and help him get a job, the same way other Uighurs helped him when he arrived here as a refugee.
At the cultural center, I asked him whether he thought his neighbors might be concerned that a former "enemy combatant" would be living among them. He didn't think they'd mind, mostly because the detainees "are innocent and everyone knows that." Besides, he said, most of his neighbors are single guys from Iran. They know a little about guilt by association when it comes to terrorism allegations. Hassan said his biggest job will be teaching his new charge about American culture and how to respect other people's opinions. After living in communist China, with one-sided media and propaganda, "We like to argue a lot," he said, laughing.
Turdi Ghoja, one of the founders of the UAA, said the families who have volunteered to take in the detainees don't believe they present any risk to the community. "Uighurs, no matter where they live, we assume we know them," he said, noting that people have volunteered because they recognize that "It could be me. It could be my brother."
At the same time, the Uighurs acknowledge that after seven years in detention, some of it solitary confinement, the detainees may have issues that go beyond those of other refugees. "I'm sure they've been exposed to a lot of things and they've suffered a lot," Ghoja said. But none of them expect the detainees to turn their anger on the US once they are here. "Any problems with the men being released can be prevented with two things: an apology and appropriate counseling," said Nury Turkel, an American-trained lawyer and past president of the UAA.
Indeed, if the American Uighur community is harboring any resentment over the detainee issue, they weren't showing it at the cultural center. Looking around the room at the folks gathered for music and lamb, Turkel said with a sweep of the hand, "The vast majority of people you see here are grateful for political asylum. Uighurs are still pro-America, believe it or not." Like them, he expects that the detainees will appreciate the fact that while the US may have illegally imprisoned them, the country also did not return them to China, as the Chinese demanded. "From the detainees' perspective, it would be a big defeat for China if they are released here," Ghoja said.
In a strange way, the detainee case has helped publicize the Uighurs' larger human rights cause in China, too. "The funny thing about the Uighurs is that they are the Tibetans you've never heard of," says Willett. The Uighurs even have their own version of the Dali Lama in Rebiya Kadeer, a Uighur business owner who was once one of the most wealthy women in China. She spent five years in a Chinese prison for sending newspaper clippings on human rights abuses to her husband in Oklahoma. Kadeer had been on her way to meet with an American congressional delegation when she was arrested.
Kadeer is a sprightly older woman with long, black braids who now lives in suburban Virginia. She was at the Nation's Day celebration, in a room decorated with photos of her with George and Laura Bush, Nelson Mandela, Madeline Albright, and even the Dalai Lama. She is one of the reasons that the Uighurs don't harbor more anger toward the US government over the detainees' treatment. "President Bush helped rescue me from Chinese prison," she explained through a translator. (The Chinese released Kadeer a few days before Condolezza Rice visited China in 2005 to discuss human rights and other issues.)
Kadeer and the other members of the Uighur community seem more upset about the Chinese role in the detainee debacle than the US's. They believe the Uighurs landed at Guantanamo because China fabricated stories about Uighur terrorist groups. "They call me personally, and the World Uighur Congress, a terrorist organization," Kadeer said. "But we are firmly united against terrorism. We understand what terror means because we are the victims." She said that while it's tragic that the Uighurs were imprisoned at Guantanamo, what's important to her is that they eventually got their day in an unbiased court.
"In the 60 years of my life, that was the first time I saw a Uighur able to defend himself in a court of law," she said, noting that tens of thousands of innocent Uighurs are in prison in China, where they can't get lawyers even though they are facing the death penalty. "I'm an example. I was one of them. I was innocent." Two of Kadeer's eleven children are still in prison because of her involvement in human rights work. "Compared to that situation, the young men in Guantanamo, they got a just court. They had their voices heard through lawyers. I greatly appreciate the fact that they had the opportunity to have a court trial. They will appreciate that."
Photo from Flickr user Manila Ryce used under a Creative Commons license.
To allow Bushco to completely and thoroughly disreguard the anti-fascist covenants such as the Nuremburg Trials that U.S. Judge Jackson chaired and says that the planning and doing of agressive war is the supreme crime on the planet earth, as it sets in motion all other crimes high, low, big, and small, is to ignore the U.S. constitution that further says that international treaties signed on to by the U.S.A. are the supreme laws of the land, alows Bushco to get away with creating unjust agreements at expense of the American and worlds peoples victories over the fascist tyranny of military dictatorship. When will that lier and thief of the public treasury be brought to justice and the horror and terror that is Guantanamo be over with. These men have been declared as innocents by American law and still they are denighed by laws that are medieval which rules by might is right and to heck with innocents of public trials, habeous corpus, juries or any other lawyers or judges. Only faulty medieval militarism rules. OBamas promise to close the Guantanamo Bay torture center and stop torture throughout the U.S. is needed now and sooner rather than later.
Bush is a war criminal and should be prosecuted and sent to Gitmo.
This is quite mind blowing. Albeit, General Grant said that the transgressions of Nations come back to roost (my rewording) when discussing the Mexican-American war, of which he was an active participant. I believe, he felt that the Civil War was what came back to roost. He obviously believed in the battle for our Union and human dignity and won the war. At the same time, I believe he was quite sickened by the death and destruction happening. Rolling the clock forward to today, we do have a pickle that will bite us back oneday. Maybe, this economic meltdown is our penance. After all, without a healthy economy we really could fund our future transgressions.
when many prisioners were brough to the Guantanamo base in Cuba by the United States government, the idea that some of the inmates would be wrongly taken was a posibility that could come with the mess of war.
The idea that some would have to be allowed into the states after the conclution that the person was not involved in terrorism was also a possibility due that the probabilities that the person would be killed if sent back to iraq by militias, were high.
Now we also have the probability that someone involved in terrorism was not proven against him.
so now the probability that you can have a terrorist in your neigborhood brought to you by the government, is a possibility.
The government against the people...WMD's ?.? Mobile Poison Gas Laboratories ?.? Mid-Range Missles ?.? Smoking Gun Going To Be A Mushroom Cloud...Ground Zero New York City " the Air Is Safe To Breathe -.- Must Get Wall Street Up And Running ".
..
...
Surgeon General’s Warning: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, And May Complicate Pregnancy
BUT The Taxes are ?.? WHY OUTLAW A CASH COW...$ $ $ $....EXPORT OUR JOBS $ $ $ $...Illegal Immigration sending money home ( do you think the money isn't comming out of your pocket ?.? )
Waterboarding was TORTURE during WWII WE prosecuted NAZI's for it.... Bush says it isn't -.- while granting himself immunity from the laws governing TORTURE
Alberto Gonzales -.- Karl Rove -.- Scooter Libby -.- Vice-President Richard Cheney -.- Abramoff..Condellesa Rice (smoking gun fame) -.- Christine Todd Whitman (the air is safe to breathe fame)....
....
....
The People Look To The COURTS -.- For Justice -.- ?.? and which Supreme Court Justice (?????) golfs with, goes fishing with, hunting with, BUT IS NOT A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS ( is the interest how much you can stuff in your pocket ??? )
Bailout -.- Bailout -.- Bailout -.-
F R A U D -.- F R A U D -.- F R A U D -.- Which is WHY THEY CAN NOT EXPLAIN -.- THE PEOPLE ARE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND ?.?.?.?.?
You'd think that a country (us) that currently (and illegally) scorns the international rule of law, wouldn't have any problem releasing fighters whose target is limited to a nation we recognize as oppressive -- and only one small "frontier" of that nation, to boot.
But nOoo, our relationship with China is too "fragile" to risk "offending" them by pursuing our own philosophy of freedom. Not only do we stifle justified criticism of China's policies, but we muzzle our "voice of freedom" in that interest; and end up doing the bidding of a regime we criticize for the very actions we wink at. This is not the way MY country should be acting.
This is not a picture of principled action. Rather, it's a picture of an incestuous relationship of power with power. Our strength as a country -- both in "real" terms, and in terms of the strength of our convictions as a people -- comes from our willingness to do hard and great things, AND our UN-willingness to compromise our core principles in the process.
If it makes better sense, cast it in school-yard bullying terms. This may seem a simplistic comparison, but interactions at the national level scale nicely from a "competing adolescents" level.
The kid with the biggest fists and the least self-respect is often the bully. China fits this to a tee: they do hold immense corporial power, and their self-image is quite fragile; as witnessed by their serial whining about the "insults" to their country, committed by any sort of truthful reportage during the recent Olympics in Beijing, and the manifold cheating they employed in order to dominate at those games, and "impress" the world.
So where do we fit in? Well, before about later decades of the last century, we still tenuously held the position of the kid who just wants to be left alone, but who will stand up for the smaller kids, when the bully gets out of hand. Now, however, we look more like a suck-up who wants to be in the bully's good graces, and so will turn a blind eye to his abuses.
This makes us a great crony to totalitarianism, and gives the bullies great reason to doubt our word and test us, whenever we do make a stand of principle. It also sells out the autonomy of those who believe as we (used to) do, that everyone has the right to self-determination, and to freedom from repression.
How can a person -- or country -- who settles for the pacification of bullies by yielding to their demands, expect any sort of respect after that, either from the bullies, or from the bully's victims? If we want respect from the world, we must (again!) learn the lesson China still hasn't learnt: that respect comes from doing the right -- albeit harder --thing; not from caving in to threats.
hope your new neighbours will celebrate with some bombings around your area.
Dan, that all souds great but are you really willing to risk your life and the lives of everyone in your family by having these people released into your neighborhood? While it would be great to shut down GITMO, I am not willing to risk my kids lives' just so people who have no business here get to be released into this country. They should be released back to their own country, they have no right to be here.
tiffany jewelry
-
tagged as:
- result
That little blue box - everyone woman dreams of seeing it come their way. tiffany jewelry jewelry is world renowned for its stunning quality and top of the line artisanship; however, it also has a reputation for having a price tag that is way out of most people's leagues.
discount tiffany jewelry That doesn't mean you can't get that Tiffany look you want at a price you can afford, however. Thanks to replica Tiffany jewelry, you can look like you are draped in Tiffany jewelry, and yet still have the money left in your pocket to go out and show off your looks.
r4 card



























