Where in the World Are the Federal Trade Commissioners?
MoJo obtains their travel records—and finds them briefing corporate lawyers in Aruba, Cancun, and elsewhere.
Does winter weather get you down? Would you rather spend chilly days at the beach in Cancun or skiing in Quebec rather than sitting behind a desk? Well, maybe you should become a commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission. FTC commissioners are charged with managing the affairs of the federal government's premier consumer protection agency—a job that seems to entail a significant amount of foreign travel, some of it legitimate, some of it a bit questionable.
On the questionable side: In January 2007, the American Bar Association's antitrust section held its annual midwinter leadership meeting in Aruba at the swank new Hyatt Regency hotel and casino. It was an exclusive group, mostly private defense lawyers who represent some of the nation's biggest companies. But joining the white-shoe attorneys at the beach were two FTC commissioners, Pamela Jones Harbour and William Kovacic, who delivered a private briefing. The group, whose members tend to oppose the agency's regulatory agenda, subsidized the commissioners' travel.
The Aruba trip kicked off a busy travel year for the commissioners, who each made at least one foreign trip in 2007, according to FTC records released to Mother Jones through a Freedom of Information Act request. Here's a sampling from their itineraries (these numbers represent a rough estimate and may include days where a commissioner only spent part of the time traveling):
- William Kovacic: After Aruba, Kovacic headed to Johannesburg for five days for a meeting of the South African Competition Tribunal in early February. Then, after a short stop in DC, Kovacic was off to Paris, Ottawa, and Brussels. Other highlights that year included visits to Istanbul, Moscow, Zurich, Sydney, Kazakhstan, Lima, Singapore, Seoul, Luxembourg, Barcelona, Toulouse, and multiple visits to Brussels. Total days abroad: 123.
- Pamela Jones Harbour: After soaking up some Aruba sunshine, Jones Harbour dashed off to Sydney. Later, she visited Mexico City; Australia; Whistler, British Columbia, and attended meetings on e-commerce in Tokyo and Hanoi. She flew back and forth to Asia, business class, to the tune of $10,000. Total days abroad: 46.
- Deborah Majoras: She jetted off to Davos for a week at the World Economic Forum, and attended conferences or gave speeches in Zurich, Bucharest, Moscow, Lisbon, Brussels, and Brazil, where she provided technical assistance to the Brazilian government's competition office. Total days abroad: 38.
- John Rosch: He gave speeches to legal groups in Zurich, Florence, and Venice. Days abroad: 26.
- Jon Leibowitz: The new FTC chairman is the least traveled commissioner, but he did manage to escape Washington's summer for the ABA antitrust section meeting in Whistler, Canada, in August 2007. Total days abroad: 11.
While 2007 was a busy year for the commissioners, these itineraries aren't atypical—especially for Kovacic, whom FTC staffers have christened "Commissioner Magellan" for his globe-trotting ways. Since President George W. Bush appointed Kovacic to a Republican slot in 2006, he has averaged nearly 100 days of foreign travel a year. So far in 2009, he has been abroad for more than 60 days. (He spent the end of June in Taiwan, Rome, and London, and celebrated July 4th in China at a conference on competition law.)
All this jetting about appears somewhat out of sync with the commission's largely domestic role. The FTC's wide-ranging mandate includes everything from enforcing used car sales regulations to ensuring that clothing manufacturers properly instruct consumers whether or not to put their shirts in the dryer. It runs the "do not call" registry to keep telemarketers at bay and cracks down on bogus weight loss cures. The agency also shares responsibility with the Justice Department for overseeing mergers and acquisitions of big companies and enforcing antitrust laws.
Referring to Kovacic's 2007 itinerary, Bruce Silverglade, legal affairs director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, says, "A hundred and twenty three days in one year at first blush does seem excessive. It's not the international trade commission." But Jon Leibowitz, the new FTC chairman, approves. "Bill is wonderfully dedicated. He's like a rock star on the international antitrust circuit...The work he's done internationally has been very helpful to the commission and he's never missed a meeting."
The FTC's broad mission does require some foreign travel. For instance, an FTC member represents the United States at the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), whose meetings are usually abroad. The FTC also participates in various international consumer protection and competition networks to facilitate law enforcement. In recent years, these issues have become more global in scope, creating a need for greater international cooperation. And with encouragement from Congress, the FTC has worked to shore up other countries' antitrust enforcement mechanisms, hoping that increased competition will open markets and ultimately reduce poverty.
But some of the commissioners' trips seem less than critical. For instance, in 2006, Jones Harbour attended a New York State Bar Association meeting in Shanghai, an outing that cost the FTC about $1,869. The association arranged a "pre-meeting" excursion around Beijing, including tours of the Great Wall and Tiananmen Square, which Jones Harbour participated in. She paid for her own lodging and meals on those days, but during the 10 days or so she was in Asia, her official work consisted of giving just one speech to the Shanghai conference plus an off-the-record presentation, according to the FTC.
In February 2007, Kovacic appeared on a panel at a Brussels conference hosted by the Progress and Freedom Foundation, an American advocacy group linked to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and funded largely by big telecom companies, whose mergers and other business practices the FTC often monitors. The foundation picked up the tab for Kovacic's trip from Paris to Brussels for the day. Kovacic says he also conducted official business in Brussels, meeting with European Commission representatives as well as with members of the US mission to the European Union.
FTC in Pockets of those they Regulate
Pretty disgusting state of affairs. It appears it is "business as ususal" in Washington and at the FTC, who justifies all of this "fun at the beach" on behalf of protecting The American Consumer. It is obvious that the FTC is in the business of protecting American Corporations rather than the individual American Consumer, and all the Branches of Government work together to do this, as demonstrated in franchising, and the big government lie of the FTC Rule governing franchising.
Yes! Where is our Justice Departement in all of this? Where is the protection of the people's purse that used to be protected by the free press and editorial freedom who didn't protect the Corporate interests --- until they became part of these Corporate Interests who now own media in our country.
Why don't Big Media ----The New York Times and the Washington Post and the other big newspapers and the magazine shows like 60 Minutes and Dateline --report really important news like this story brought to us by Mother Jones and Stephanie Menciner? (I was brought to believe that the big networks like CBS and the Government work together after they fired Dan Rather for trying to bring the truth to the American public. After years of faithful service to the American Public, CBS unceremoniously dumped him instead of pursuing the truth and setting the record straight one way or the other.)
Until we get clean elections and clean reporting, this government of the people, by the people, and for the people is threatened. Thanks Stenphanie Mensimer for this important reporting of ugly truth to the American people who are smart enough to read Mother Jones and smart enough to contribute to a really "free press."
Re FTC in Pockets of those they Regulate
Excellent response Anonymous on July 7, 2009 - 10:21am.
Stenphanie Mensimer and Mother Jones are most certainly to be continuously congratulated and recognized for "important reporting of ugly truth to the American people."
But the sad reality is that there really haven't been nearly enough We The People who have taken enough time to demand a return to Democracy in Washington to overthrow special interest based political and bureaucratic corruption that rules Washington.
However the political parties control their own politicians while We The People are basically disenfranchised by having to vote for candidates controlled by party special interests instead of We The People.
That's why we went to war in Iraq, why we have the current decline into depression, why our planet is so polluted already that we can't possibly repair the damages in time to prevent an unacceptable future of out of control pollution, corruption, hate, greed, poverty, disease, starvation, crime and terrorism that will change the entire human race and the environment of planet earth before the end of this century at the present rates of tipping point failures.
That is unless Mother Jones can take "important reporting of ugly truth to the American people" to the next level to create a Twitter Revolution in America to save what is left to be saved of the future for Generations X, Y, Z+.
FTC Commissioners and Political Spoils System
How about a little biographical information on these Commissioners. Where do they come from and what is their perspective? Are they a part of the political "spoils system" in that they are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate?
If so, the Commissioners would never be smart enough to protect the interests of the American people because they, perhaps, wouldn't have the knowledge or the desire to fight the Corporate representatives with whom they deal with on a comfortable basis in exotic places and beaches -- as well as their clever attorneys who write the laws that benefit Commerce in the global economy.
Ronald Reagan eviscerated
Ronald Reagan eviscerated the FTC in the guise of cutting "unnecessary government spending." Of course, the budget deficit ballooned from 73-billion with a fully functional FTC to 370-bln with a phantom one. The real motive was to get the consumer-police off the street so the robber-barons could operate with impunity. This office remained a hollow shell for the past 29 years (and running).
Our government is being run as a for-profit business. Its like Disneyworld--only without the fun. I think most people realize this but few have the guts to speak out. Many people have been crippled for crossing powerful entities in this country. It is not an entirely imaginary hazard. We don't have the KGB busting into people's homes in the middle O' the night and dragging them off to Siberia. What we do have is a 'country-club' court system that supports the survival of the sleaziest power-mongers.
Wasn't
Obama supposed to fix the entire world? Of course the FTC has no interest in consumer protection, Barrack hired a nearly full slate of lobbyists including many corporates. He has done nothing different from Bush Jr. and even handed out his own $800B+ 'screwthevoters' package. I'm sorry guys, but you've been hoodwinked. I'll give you one clue of what's in store for you - - Research the historically famous statue that Barack Obama gave a speech in front of in late 2008, in Deutschland.
Madoff and the FTC explained
I suddenly see why and how the FTC didn't do anything about Madoff's scam for so long. They really were out of town and out of touch!
FTC in Pockets of those they Regulate
These Commissioners probably rationalize that the FTC, who, under its power to regulate Commerce, regulates advertising on the Internet (and not very well) plays a big role in the digital economy and in global networking for the "new" Capitalism" which will link global economies. There is no doubt that the Internet has changed and will change the way business is conducted throughout the world.
Will American consumers and American workers be underserved or well served because our government/corporate partnership view American citizens as citizens of the world who are joining a global economy where the multi-national Corporate interests are linked in the search for greater profits? '
In this search for greater profits in the greater world, will Americans be short changed because government policy makers are educated only by the Corporate Sector and their attorneys, who write the laws, and who buy our policy makers routinely in the Halls of Congress and in the Executive with offers of trips to the beach and other inducements?
We voted for Obama, NOW we need to let him know what we think!
Unfortunately, a LOT of President Obama's appointments and decisions have carried on "W"'s policies. As Americans watched his presidential campaign, we grew to believe that the real CHANGE he promised was possible under a new Democratic Obama administration, but we are now seeing that very little has really changed so far. Some tell us to wait and give our new president time. Well, one of the things that I remember him telling us over and over and over again was that he "could NOT do it without us -the American people", so we need to step up and speak out and let him know when he is off track and demand that he correct his course and fulfill his promises. Now is NOT the time to wait! There are too many vital issues at stake, so speak up and get involved. Join a great organization like PDA (Progressive Democrats of America) to help bring true social justice, equality and peace to our troubled nation and Democratic form of government. Let's not let our president down.
Government Failure --The Spoils ---and the Machine
I agree! I voted for President Obama because he promised change to the American people.
I understand that government is a huge "machine" with many working parts that is powered by the rule of law made by our representatives in the Congress.
I understand that President Obama cannot make changes as quickly as he would like to make them, because he has to change the law to effect change, and those Corporate special interests who have influenced the law to their own favor will fight any changes in the law and lobby the Congress of the United States, as usual, to protect their favored position in the law.
He inherited a Godawful mess that required immediate action that even the economic experts are not sure will work, as intended ---and two wars. The Republicans are running for the next election already and are already denying that they enabled the terrible financial crisis. The independents will become impatient if there is no change, or changes that they don't agree with, and perhaps it will be business as usual, and the President will not realize his policies for change because his own party won't even come to agreement and fully support him.
My country "tis of thee" --my Country, right or wrong, my country! But, my government, when wrong, needs to mend its ways when it doesn't function efficiently to serve the needs of the American People.
We need to support President Obama and his quest for change, I agree!
Fantastic reporting from
Fantastic reporting from Mother Jones! Thank you again for holding politicians and business people accountable - some one must do it and you're dtiffany jewelry
tiffany and cooing the right thing!
tiffany jewelry
-
tagged as:
- result
That little blue box - everyone woman dreams of seeing it come their way. tiffany jewelry jewelry is world renowned for its stunning quality and top of the line artisanship; however, it also has a reputation for having a price tag that is way out of most people's leagues.
discount tiffany jewelry That doesn't mean you can't get that Tiffany look you want at a price you can afford, however. Thanks to replica Tiffany jewelry, you can look like you are draped in Tiffany jewelry, and yet still have the money left in your pocket to go out and show off your looks.
r4 card




























