Here’s Why We Have No Clue How Often Rape Is Happening in the US

Federal agencies just can’t agree on the definition.

seb_ra/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Federal agencies don’t have a uniform definition of sexual assault, and that has led to dramatically different estimates on the frequency of sexual violence in the United States, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

Because agencies have different definitions of rape, government estimates for cases of sexual assault and violence can vary widely. In 2011, for instance, different federal agency estimates ranged from 244,190 cases of rape or sexual-assault victimizations to 1.92 million victims of rape or attempted rape. The agencies also do not make it clear to the public how they define sexual assault. That’s a problem, the report notes, because data is “critical” for both policymakers and the public to understand and address these crimes.

“The bottom line is that this can all lead to confusion,” said Gretta Goodwin, acting director of the GAO. “We are just asking that there be more transparency about the data and what it means.”

Currently, four federal agencies—the Department of Justice, the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Defense—manage at least 10 efforts to collect data. The problems begin in how sexual violence is described and categorized. Agencies rarely used the same terminology to describe acts of sexual violence, the report found, and even when they did, there were differences in how they measured each act: For instance, four out of six data collection efforts that measured rape considered whether actual physical force was used, but the other two did not. This in part explains why yearly estimates of the number of rapes have ranged so widely.

 

Sen. Claire McCaskill, who requested the GAO report, said in a statement that there needs to be a way to measure instances of sexual violence that’s “standard and transparent.” “Without the ability to make apples to apples comparisons across populations—whether that’s college students, our military, or other groups—it’s difficult to measure trends over time and determine how we’re doing in terms of reducing incidents and boosting reporting,” she said.

These differences in data collection are partly due to the priorities each agency has in analyzing their data, says Janet Lauritsen, a professor of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The Department of Health and Human Services emphasizes the number of victims of sexual violence in order to assess the health impact on victims, but the Department of Justice is more concerned with identifying the number of incidents of sexual violence so it can respond to cases of sexual violence more effectively, Lauritsen says. Though this data serves each agency’s specific needs, the lack of consistency in determining what constitutes rape and how it is measured makes it extremely difficult to track changes or trends over time

An additional problem, the GAO noted, is a lack of transparency: Government agencies don’t publicly make available how they measure sexual violence, which can be confusing for someone who is trying to look up these numbers. “The agencies know [their data], but when they present information, the public has no idea, or the public has limited knowledge, about what went into that,” GAO director Goodwin said.

The report concluded with a series of recommendations for addressing the problem. While the GAO acknowledged that agencies were making efforts to resolve the differences in definitions, it said that these efforts were “fragmented” and limited in scope. The GAO called for more coordination, advised the agencies to make their sexual-violence data information more readily available, and suggested that the Office of Management and Budget start a federal interagency forum that would coordinate sexual-violence data efforts. The OMB hasn’t agreed, saying that it may not be the most strategic use of its resources, according to the GAO.  

Neena Chaudhry, director of education and senior counsel at the National Women’s Law Center, a nonprofit focused on women’s rights, stressed that even if there is a wide range in the numbers on sexual assault, that doesn’t change an organization’s responsibility to address the issue. “Ultimately whether it’s 1 in 4, or 1 in 5 [people who experience sexual assault], it’s too much,” she said. “When it comes to an individual person and an individual school, the responsibility is the same, regardless of the total number.”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate