Conservative Lawyers Conference: a Job Fair for the Trump Administration?

At the Federalist Society’s annual convention, several potential Supreme Court justices and lots of job seekers.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito addressing the Federalist Society's 2016 national convention in Washington DC.AP Photo/Cliff Owen

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Perhaps the clearest manifestation of the dissipation of conservative antipathy toward Donald Trump now that he’s been elected president could be found this week in the halls of the tony Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC.

There, the Federalist Society, a prominent conservative legal organization, held its national convention. The organization had been lukewarm if not outright hostile to Trump during the campaign. But this week, it was already showing signs that a normalization of his politics is well underway, as conservative attorneys flocked to the event, some in the hopes of making the right connections to land a plum job in the new administration.

This year’s legal convention was dedicated to the memory of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February. The subject matter was already some what somber, but the conference schedule also seemed to reflect a coming gloom about the future of the conservative Supreme Court, having been drawn up long before Election Day, when a Hillary Clinton victory still seemed virtually inevitable. Many in the organization had opposed Trump, including the group’s co-founder, Steven Calabresi, one of a number of prominent legal scholars who signed on to a letter October from “Originalists Against Trump.” They wrote:

Many Americans still support Trump in the belief that he will protect the Constitution. We understand that belief, but we do not share it. Trump’s long record of statements and conduct, in his campaign and in his business career, have shown him indifferent or hostile to the Constitution’s basic features—including a government of limited powers, an independent judiciary, religious liberty, freedom of speech, and due process of law.

But when the conference opened Thursday morning with a speech from Justice Samuel Alito, the conservative justice spoke to a packed house. Registration for the event, according to organizers, soared immensely after the election, and it was reflected in the endless lunch lines. Hans von Spakovsky, a member of the Federal Election Commission under President George W. Bush and a regular at Federalist Society events, told me when I noted the uptick in attendance that I had made a mistake. “You are under the impression that you are attending the 2016 Federalist Society national lawyers convention,” he deadpanned. “This is the 2016 Trump administration job fair.” Von Spakovsky said he had not been contacted by anyone from the Trump team looking for a new FEC chair, but Trump probably owes him a word of thanks: He was one of the architects of the voter suppression campaign that began in the Bush administration and ultimately made it harder to vote in the recent election in some places and which some critics blame for Trump’s victory.

Rumors were flying that Calabresi was in New York this week to consult with the Trump team on Supreme Court nominations, and there was talk of a Trump Tower sighting of Leo Leonard, the Federalist Society’s executive vice president. The rumors couldn’t be confirmed, but there was a clear sense at the conference that whatever happened before the election would be put in the past, and that the group was eager to have a role in the new Republican administration.

Also on hand for the event was another group that generated intense speculation: people on Trump’s shortlist for the Supreme Court. Among them was Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett, an acerbic conservative who’s mocked Trump on Twitter but who nonetheless made his shortlist. I asked a bow-tied Willett whether he’d heard from Trump since the election. “I think I’ll exercise some judicial discretion and make a graceful exit,” he demurred, walking away to make a call.

Michigan Supreme Court Justice Joan Larsen, 47, was more forthcoming. On the shortlist even though her judicial experience encompasses but a single year in her current role, she said that she had not heard from the Trump team. Did she want a promotion to the high court? “I’m just a week out from having won my retention election,” she said diplomatically. “I’m really just focused on the next two years.”

Meanwhile, if things go well for the lawyers at the convention, perhaps they’ll be holding their 2017 event at the Trump International.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate