«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Thoughts on M.I.A.'s Kala
If you've been a faithful Riff reader, you've heard a lot about M.I.A., otherwise known as Maya Arulpragasam: from the YouTube debuts of "Bird Flu" and "Boyz," to the arrival of advance copies of the new album, to her streaming all of Kala online. So, the album arrives in stores tomorrow: what's the final verdict?
With Kala named after Arulpragasam's mother, it's illustrative to look back at Arular, her 2005 debut, named after her father. The first singles, "Sunshowers" and "Galang," featured similar downtempo dancehall beats, with edgy lyrics that seemed to invite analysis as part of the London-born singer's Sri Lankan heritage and her father's participation in militant Tamil activism: "shotgun, get down / too late, you down." My experience with the full-length was a kind of gradual awareness: certain tracks grabbed my attention at first (the rollicking freestyle of "10 Dollar") while others took time to adjust to (the aggressive Baile funk of "Bucky Done Gun"). As time went by, the album seemed to capture both a forward-looking electronic sound (partially thanks to its edgy producers, including Diplo and Richard X), as well as a political mood informed by both anger and ebullience.
So, two years later, M.I.A. is back in action, with production duties mostly taken over by Switch, a UK electronic artist and DJ whose chopped-up style teeters on the bleeding edge of dance music. Again, the first singles, "Bird Flu" and "Boyz," featured similar triple-time beats and lyrics with obtuse references to violence and politics. But as Robert Christgau pointed out in Rolling Stone, the rest of Kala doesn't seem accessible, with jagged beats and even more eclectic references: Bollywood, didgeridoo, The Clash, The Pixies, Baltimore house. While he calls this an "art music," it may be helpful to remember that Arular's catchiness was by no means immediate, and tracks like "Bucky Done Gun" seemed brittle and abrasive at first. M.I.A. has a tendency to shift the world to her point of view, and while Kala forces your ears to adjust to its pressurized depths (and vertigo-inducing heights), I'd buy stock in Kala sing-along futures.
Politically, some have accused M.I.A. of being "indistinct." The New York Times says she's prone to "Bono-esque declarations" and that "her objectives have not been spelled out very clearly," and even well-informed reviews of Kala seem perplexed: The Guardian gives her four out of five stars, but then fills paragraphs with sneering insults of M.I.A.'s "egocentric smugness," "glib sloganeering," and, most appallingly, compares her multiculturalism to "Angelina Jolie's attitude towards starting a family... just order in the constituent bits from various far-flung corners of the world." While these reviewers seem to say M.I.A. doesn't really stand for anything, I think the opposite is true: as a mixed-culture "Other," M.I.A. can't help but stand for something, whether or not she even wants to. Her heritage is, in the context of 21st century America, inescapable. As both a London hipster and a dark-skinned third-world woman, she straddles our definitions and defies our conventions, just by virtue of her very existence. In that context, the fact that she approaches her music and visual art with an eclectic punk-rock playfulness and sarcasm, instead of an easily-pigeonholed cultural literalism, is in itself an almost unthinkably radical statement: the disenfranchised sampling themselves.
To again reference Christgau's insightful Rolling Stone review, there's a riot on Kala, and while he insists it isn't dangerous, I'm not so sure. Our prejudices are strong, our arbitrary boundaries of race and gender are often all we've got, our visions of a world full of unwashed masses desperate for capitalism deeply entrenched. These city walls (as Bono might put it) don't even get talked about much these days, in our desperate, fearful times, let alone scaled, or plastered with day-glow posters of the missing in action. Like a pirate broadcast, like a bomb thrown over the border, Kala proves that those of us inside the walls are the truly disenfranchised, and with that in mind, it's hard to believe M.I.A. ever got that visa.
Comments
I completely agree with your assessment of Kala and more importantly the voice of the Other that it represents. Although I'm frankly tired of being referred to as an Other, if that's what it takes to make western (read: white) people realize that brown people exist, then it's fine by me.
Also, your point about the disenfranchised sampling themselves is astonishing in how clearly it captures what MIA is about. You can even see it in the clothes she wears. Traditionally, it would be classified as clothes for poor people from the ghetto; however, wielding the tools of Western "hipster"-dom, the clothes assume a new significance and, if anything, claw their way into a form of legitimacy.
Finally, there was an article in Time magazine, I believe about how Arular represented the sound of the third world. What was the metaphor the writer used? Oh, yes, Arular sounded like music that the boy throwing a bomb at the tank would listen to. You touch upon that sentiment with your section about the city walls, as it really serves to illustrate an "end of the empire" view (in so far as the balance of power between the peoples of the world is beginning to shift) that MIA promotes/provokes with her music. Case in point, I could swear the line dance midway in the Boyz video is from Riverdance? I might be wrong, but I could swear that's where I saw it.
Manuel, thanks for the comments. I should have clarified my use of the term "Other": as I had posted recently about the Robert Christgau review, which explored the concept extensively, I was referring to his desciption. Whether anyone with different skin color than yourself is an automatic "Other," I'm not sure I believe, and I can completely understand that becoming tiresome. In this instance the concept was being used by Christgau to illustrate a specific point about M.I.A.'s use of cultural signifiers, I think, and my using the term was to continue that discussion. Glad you appreciated it and hope I didn't add to the annoyance. And yes, the dancing sure looks like Riverdance -- who the hell knows anymore?!
Posted by: Party Ben on 09/04/07 at 9:48 PM Respond
I surfed all the web till found the best searcher. Films, picts, mp3’s, videos and lots more at http://megauploadfiles.com/
Posted by: =D on 05/31/08 at 2:45 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Video: Fox News Altered Photos (6)
JustAMan wrote:
Oh yea Evil Fox! But praise be to CBS and its fake docume...
[more]
New (Leaked) Music: Beck - Modern Guilt (1)
Jason Walker wrote:
WOW !! 30 MIN album sounds like the producers/radio execs...
[more]
The Dust Off (sort of): Zach de la Rocha (1)
J wrote:
Rage fans like me have been waiting for the day when Zach ...
[more]
The Halfway Mark: The Best Albums of 2008 So Far (9)
hip-hop bob wrote:
El-P - We'reAllGoingToBurnInHellMegaMixx2
Atmosphere - Whe...
[more]
Confidential to Amy Winehouse (2)
Guy Incognito wrote:
Who the hell cares....
[more]
CD Review: Lil Wayne - Tha Carter III (13)
r adams wrote:
Would Weezy add anything to a Jay Z album? Exactly....
[more]
Everybody Going Wacky for Wall-E (10)
Marcel wrote:
@Party Ben: Jeez... for someone who thinks Lil Wayne and P...
[more]
The Dust-Off: The Feelies (2)
Party Ben wrote:
Swear on Ian Curtis' stolen grave that I really do. Got it...
[more]
Boots Riley: F Bombs Not Cool in Norfolk (1)
nic wrote:
A real righteous MC right there. The Coup is what Hip Ho...
[more]
What is Music's "Modern Era"? (2)
nic wrote:
Nice post Ben, seriously!
I think it's dangerous to equ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Manuel Montes on 09/04/07 at 7:05 PM Respond