1. Steinski - What Does It All Mean? 1983-2006 Retrospective (90)
2. The Bug - London Zoo (90)
3. Plush - Fed (89)
4. Bon Iver - For Emma, Forever Ago (89)
5. TV On The Radio - Dear Science, (88)
6. Fleet Foxes – S/T (87)
7. Nick Cave And The Bad Seeds - Dig!!! Lazarus Dig!!! (87)
8. Robyn – S/T (86)
9. Hercules And Love Affair – S/T (86)
10. Protest The Hero – Fortress (86)
11. Shearwater - Rook (85)
12. Harvey Milk - Life...The Best Game In Town (85)
13. Portishead - Third (85)
14. The Hold Steady - Stay Positive (85)
15. Paavoharju - Laulu Laakson Kukista (85)
16. Randy Newman - Harps And Angels (85)
17. Kasai Allstars - In The 7th Moon, The Chief Turned Into A Swimming Fish And Ate The Head Of His Enemy By Magic(84)
18. The Music Tapes - Music Tapes for Clouds & Tornadoes (84)
19. Fucked Up - Chemistry Of Common Life (84)
20. Teddy Thompson - A Piece Of What You Need (84)

Where do I start? At the top, 'nuff respect to Steinski, whose cut-and-paste creations influenced everything from Girl Talk to The Avalanches. But jeez, I'm a musical collage artist (er, a wannabe artist) myself, and even I think this stuff has more intellectual appeal than "listenability." It's really just acid house, which had a brief flash of popular ascendance in the mid-to-late-'80s, and its fast-paced collage of musical and non-musical vocal samples (see M.A.R.R.S. "Pump Up the Volume") sounded fresh and exciting for about 3 years. Then came Prince's "Batdance." Shudder. Of course, it's vital to for critics to support musical collage as valid art, but album of the year?

At #2, The Bug have made an interesting album that distills a lot of the current reggae-inflected U.K. sounds under the aegis of "dubstep," although some of the tracks on Zoo are really reggaeton or dancehall. The Bug's version of dubstep, a sludgy, glacially-paced genre at the bleeding edge of musical trends, is accurate enough, but the album suffers from a typical problem with dance music edge-cutters: it sounds great when anonymous singles are mixed by a DJ in a dark club, but can get a little tiring on an album.

Plush's Fed is a bafflingly self-indulgent Beatles-meets-Jackson-Browne jam session, Bon Iver makes strong but not exactly boundary-pushing acoustic folk, and only at #5 do we find, well, an album I love. What's the problem here? Well, first of all, Metacritic only requires seven reviews before an album can qualify for their list, and in this day and age, that's not too hard. The Steinski album counts Sputnikmusic, The Wire and cokemachineglow in its top reviews, and The Bug only has ten reviews total, half of them from the U.K. press. Plus, a single, random 100-point review can bring an album's average way up. I don't mean to be undemocratic here, Metacritic, but maybe bringing the minimum review count up wouldn't be a bad idea, and perhaps throwing out the highest and lowest scores might help bring things back down to earth. Of course, readers interested in what the actual best albums of the year are need only pay attention to the Riff, where the definitive list will be posted in late December.