MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Bush's Shadow Justice Department: Did the Federalist Society Have a Hand in Attorney Firings?

Washington Dispatch: The right-wing lawyers' group is the casting couch for the federal judiciary—and may have been, newly released documents indicate, for the Justice Department too.

June 7, 2007


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


Before midnight on March 7, 2005, Leonard Leo tapped out an email on his BlackBerry to Mary Beth Buchanan, then the director of the Executive Office of United States Attorneys, suggesting a candidate to replace Carol Lam, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California. "You guys need a good candidate?" Leo, the executive vice president of the Federalist Society, wrote to Buchanan, herself a member of the influential conservative lawyers' group. "I'd strongly recommend the current GC [general counsel] of the Air Force, Mary Walker."

At the time, White House and Justice Department officials were in preliminary talks about replacing an unspecified number of "underperforming" federal prosecutors, a plan that would culminate almost two years later in the forced resignations of nine U.S. Attorneys, including Lam, and ignite a scandal that has claimed the jobs of at least four high-ranking Justice Department officials. Leo's email, written so early in the process, speaks to the close relationship that has developed between the Federalist Society—an organization whose aims include "reordering priorities" within the judicial system to fit its conservative agenda—and key Justice Department decision makers, many of whom are members of the group.

While perhaps not a prerequisite for employment at the highest echelons of Justice, membership in the society has become a standard by which political appointees at the agency identify candidates who share their agenda. Some officials at the agency view it as such an indicator of conservative virtue that membership in the society was included as a category—along with Hill and campaign experience—on a spreadsheet that was used to rank the qualifications of the 93 sitting U.S. Attorneys, a document included in the reams of Justice Department memoranda released by the House Judiciary Committee this spring.

Beyond highlighting the organization's role as the administration's de facto headhunter for conservative lawyers and judges, Leo's correspondence raises the question of what, if any, role the Federalist Society played in the prosecutor firings. Leo did not respond to messages left at his office and on his cell phone, but he told the New York Times last night that, when he emailed Buchanan, he was unaware that a plan was in the works to replace multiple U.S. Attorneys. But, he acknowledged, his recommendation was not unsolicited. "The only way I could have possibly made that recommendation is if somebody said to me, 'Gee, do you know anyone who would be good?'" he said.

Leo's email, released yesterday as part of an ongoing congressional investigation into the prosecutor firings, marks the second time in as many days that his name has been raised in connection with the probe. Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Bradley Schlozman—the controversial Justice Department official who replaced Todd Graves as the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri—acknowledged seeking Leo's advice on candidates to fill career positions at the agency. Unlike his former colleague, Monica Goodling, who testified that she "crossed the line" in vetting the political bonafides of job applicants, Schlozman denied subjecting potential hires to a political litmus test.

His record would suggest otherwise. Schlozman is a member of the Federalist Society, and in May the Boston Globe reported that half of the career lawyers hired during his tenure were members of the society or the conservative Republican National Lawyers Association; among the eight hires during the previous two years, none had been. According to Joseph Rich, a 37-year veteran of the Justice Department who served as the head of the agency's voting rights section until 2005, Schlozman was among a cadre of appointees who have presided over an unprecedented wave of politicization at the agency. Within the Civil Rights division, where Schlozman served until March 2006, "there appeared to be a conscious effort to remake the Division's career staff," Rich told Congress in March. He described "major" changes in hiring procedures "which virtually eliminated any career staff input into the hiring of career attorneys." As a result, he went on, the attorneys hired for the division had "little if any experience in, or commitment to, the enforcement of civil rights laws."

The politicization of Justice went well beyond hiring practices, according to Rich, extending to efforts to "influence elections." Schlozman, he says, was part of a group of political appointees that greenlighted Tom DeLay's controversial redistricting plan, which resulted in Texas Republicans winning a record number of U.S. House seats in the 2004 election. Later, while serving as the interim U.S. Attorney in Missouri, Schlozman indicted four voter registration recruiters for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) on charges of voter fraud days before the mid-term elections. (During his Senate appearance this week, Schlozman maintained that he was unaware of ACORN's political leanings.)

The Federalist Society's advice has been sought not only on Justice Department hires: Leonard Leo is one of the Bush administration's go-to experts on the federal judiciary. When the time arrived for the president to fill two open Supreme Court slots, Leo took a temporary leave from the Society in order to advise the administration. The administration did end up selecting two Federalist Society members for the high court, bringing to four the number of Supreme Court justices (Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito) who claim membership in the organization.

Leo was less successful in selling Justice on his pick to replace Carol Lam. This owed, perhaps, to Mary Walker's controversial past. In addition to being accused of whitewashing an investigation of rampant sexual assault at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Walker also headed the group of Pentagon lawyers that produced a report arguing that the president was not bound by the Geneva Conventions. When Lam stepped down in February, she was replaced by one of her deputies, Karen Hewitt—also a member of the Society.

Daniel Schulman is an investigative reporter at Mother Jones.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

I find this scenario very implausible. During a presidency, there have only been a very few number of US Attorneys replaced in the course of a president's tenure. The majority of replacements occur at the onset of the presidency with the changing of the guard. With this precedent set, I find it extremely odd that Leo would be emailing out candidates for a US Attorney position that by all public information seemed to be Carol Lam's until at least 2008. It appears not only did someone create a list of US Attorneys to be fired, but they also leaked the list to politically motivated organizations that lean their respective way.
Posted by:JacobJune 8, 2007 8:56:10 AMRespond ^
The Federalist Society should be required to become a lobbyist group for the conservative right wing. If they are going to be headhunters, then they are political and should be brought out into the light, so they no longer lurk in the shadows, and yet have such great influence. Bush power grab continues with his taking all power to himself if he declares a national emergency, anyone want to be he and his kill dog Dich Cheney won't make up a national emergency before elections, to try to let Bush stay on, so he can become king of Bushland.
Posted by:Terry JohnsonJune 8, 2007 11:27:56 AMRespond ^
Such a miserable situation. IF regime change occurs in 2008, how many decades will it take to recover from the damage done?
Posted by:D. DarbyJune 8, 2007 11:57:06 AMRespond ^
Have to agree with Jacob. Why would he write a recommendation to replace one particular USA instead of saying something like, "This person would make a good USA next time you need one." Time for Congress to write Leonard Leo a subpoena.
Posted by:EricJune 8, 2007 12:48:20 PMRespond ^
Terry Johnson, I hope you are right about them declarng a national emergency. We all know how inept they are at that. This should push voters to go to the polls enmasse to kick the Republicans out. This is indeed the WORST administration in the history of the country.
Posted by:VickiJune 8, 2007 12:53:06 PMRespond ^
It's all about power, continued, sustained political and accordingly economic power. If you don't factor power in your opinion about the current or any administration, then you're way off base. This is way this scenario is very plausible, indeed.
Posted by:TrojanJune 8, 2007 1:01:55 PMRespond ^
The Federalist Society is a facist, racist, elitist organization that should be prosecuted out of existence. I would never want any of it's member's to represent me or my business. This organization had the gall to allow Carl Rove to speak and receive their admiration when "everyone" in America knows that he participated in the outing of an undercover CIA agent and is therefore a criminal. The organization is outrageous, corrupt and criminal as is the president, vice president and attorney general of the United States of America; each of these need to be impeached! Congress where is your leadership?!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by:john copelandJune 8, 2007 1:35:01 PMRespond ^
When will the devastation of our beloved country end? When the people put an end to it. George W. is but the face, bought and sold. God forgive us.
Posted by:EdJune 8, 2007 5:09:21 PMRespond ^
My family has been impacted by the politicization of the North Carolina US Attorney, who refuses to investigate fellow republicans,inspite of his being presentented with incontrovertible evidence of public corruption including bribery. Lam and the other 8 are the tip of a very large ice berg that our ship of state is aimed at.
Posted by:Skip RothJune 9, 2007 3:25:57 AMRespond ^
This is brazen! But then again media lies are all hidden out in plain view. When the public gets desensitized to lies the most common response is "It's just politics" or "Everybody does it". Catching the school board in lies is no big deal in my berg.
Posted by:JT BarrieJune 9, 2007 6:17:55 AMRespond ^
One of my neighbors still believes that Iraq was about to attack the USA in 2003. The power of propaganda is amazing, especially considering the allegedly intelligent folk who populate the right wing.
Posted by:ginoJune 9, 2007 9:18:56 AMRespond ^
Partisan firings, be they democrat OR republican, are still questionable and controversial because they speak to the action of ulterior motive over process and procedure. Referring back to the Constitution and due process, no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without such due process, as set forth IN the fifth amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, Bush's "..goddamn piece of paper", and as has become evident in several other areas, the people in this administration could frankly give a tinker's damn for any of that, and due process is only a hindrance when you have eminent domain ambitions etc. Matter of fact, that whole law business really does just waste a bunch of time when you're trying to get stuff done, oil magnates to placate, that whole deal, so it should come as no surprise that a legion of unquestioning party loyalists should then be appointed to expedite whatever agenda it is that they're running on. Business comes first, right? Right? Hmmm....
Posted by:BertJune 9, 2007 10:28:28 AMRespond ^
hahahaaaaa.... what do you think those REPUBLICAN THINK TANKS were doing all these years? Wake up, already, you idiots!
Posted by:DARKERJune 10, 2007 3:08:55 AMRespond ^
Bush dis enough damage as governor of Texas. All the government oversight agencies are ruled by the industries which are supposed to be monitored by the agencies. As President, he expanded the bought and paid for government. "We the people" are being frivolously and fraudulently represented. It's past time to impeach and imprison these criminals. I had to find out too much the hard way in Texas. But, after being tortured by the government, I helped expose Bush's TMAPS. Thousands of elderly (including my mother)and children drugged to death to enrich "big pharma" and the Bush family.
Posted by:Mother's AdvocateJune 12, 2007 1:10:53 AMRespond ^
I would have rather been lied to and victimized by foreign terrorists than to have lost all faith in our government. Who could believe that our government has become so corrupt, dishonest, and evil. Even most of the media has been bought by these political criminals. The Fort Worth Star Telegram reported that the Texas Attorney General said that the state was conned in to TMAPS. After the hell the state put me through for daring to notice the frauds and harms of the TMAPS drugs, I know without a doubt that the state was not conned. And to think G.W. claims to be a Christian! He is a disgrace to our country. I'll only have faith in this government: when, I see G.W. held accountable for his dirty, evil, and greedy deeds. The Republican corruptions exist at the local, state, and federal levels of government. With hard evidence, I have not been able to get anyone to prosecute the criminal official mis-conduct of the (Republican) Hood County District Judge's little brother.
Posted by:Mother's AdvocateJune 12, 2007 1:28:39 AMRespond ^
how much more evidence does congress need to impeach either bush or cheney? betrayal of the public trust is one of the qualifying charges to enter charges against any sitting president. it must be done right now to stop and end this abuse of the presidential office.
Posted by:jesse m. sanchezJune 16, 2007 10:28:51 AMRespond ^
The Federalists do not only meddle with the Justice system. The Federalists are the judges (Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Bork). Roberts was involved in meddling with the 2000 election which led to his eventual nomination. The problem here stems from the Electoral College and its claim to have the power to reverse the vote of the American people. Andrew Jackson said in 1828 that the Electoral College has no such power. The President of the United States is the person favored by the greater number of the citizens of the United States who vote and not the greater number of the Supreme Court or the greater number of electors of the Electoral College. The clause on the Electoral College in the Constitution is unconstitutional.
Posted by:Gary Michael CoutinAugust 21, 2007 3:32:36 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS