MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Alexis Debat's Pentagon Links: Did the Discredited ABC Consultant Get DOD Money Too?

News: A D.C. think tank confirms that it retained Debat on a Pentagon project; relationship is over "as of today."

September 18, 2007


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


As Mother Jones first reported last week, Alexis Debat, the terrorism expert and former ABC News consultant who published alleged interviews with the likes of Barack Obama that he had not in fact conducted, has claimed to associates over the past year to have received "a large chunk of money" from the Pentagon for a study concerning radical Islam. I have since been told that Debat was preparing a study on Islamic warfare, and that his client, albeit indirectly, was Andrew Marshall, head of the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, a kind of in-house think tank.

Here's the story. On September 17, Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Karen Finn, a spokeswoman for the policy office, told me that the Defense Department did not have a direct contract with Debat, but "DOD does have a contract with the company [Debat] works for … I suggest you contact his employer for additional information." The employer she referred me to was the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), a think tank headed by defense analyst Andrew Krepinevich (Debat also, until last week, had a relationship with the Nixon Center, a think tank that describes itself as "America's realist voice").

Krepinevich told Mother Jones that he had hired Debat as a consultant in April 2007 to provide analytical support overseeing a contract from the Pentagon Office of Net Assessment, but that he was in the process of severing it; he later sent me an email saying that the "relationship has been terminated, effective today."

"We had a contract with the Pentagon to do some work," he told me. "We hired Alexis to support us in that work. His sole arrangement with us was as a consultant."

"We didn't know the extent to which his background was misrepresented," Krepinevich added. "Once we identified and confirmed it, like others, we severed it."

Krepinevich did confirm that the contract in question was from the Pentagon Office of Net Assessment, but would not reveal the exact topic. Two other sources who had heard of the contract told me it concerned a study of Islamic warfare.

Krepinevich's online bio indicates that he formerly worked in the Pentagon Office of Net Assessment. He has also written an account of the Army's failures in Vietnam. CSBA "gets a significant percentage of our revenue from government and also foundations," he said.

"One of the concerns you might have is that he was somehow influencing U.S. policy," Krepinevich said. "We were fortunate in a sense that in this circumstance, it was discovered before things proceeded very far. The reports he provided to us don't exist."

"I feel badly," Krepinevich added. "This was a person at the Nixon Center. He did work at ABC." At the time, he said, he felt that, "If they vetted him, I don't need to worry so much."

"One thing: the Nixon center, ABC, CSBA—we are all in the information business," Krepinevich added. "We are in the business of looking at what's going on in the world and adding some value to that. In the information business, if the information is blatantly wrong, I can't count on the credibility of it."

Krepinevich also expressed concern about Debat's wellbeing, a point raised by other associates and sources. Some suggested that Debat might move to the Middle East; others that he should take his story to Hollywood.

I asked Krepinevich what the moral of the story might be. He thought about it, and responded: "We live in the information age, in a time when people's demand for instant and insightful and incisive analysis of issues is at all time high. And you have this voracious competition between various news services, on the air 24 hours a day, seven days a week, competing who can break the story first. … And the person who in a sense says I have the special access, I can provide tremendous value added—the temptation is to buy the sizzle before you inspect the steak."

Laura Rozen is the National Security Correspondent for Mother Jones.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

What the heck is "Islamic warfare". Is this some kind of newspeak like "islamfasist"?
Posted by:ZanubiyahAhmedSeptember 18, 2007 6:18:53 PMRespond ^
Laura, We have heard a lot about Debat's lies and exaggerations, but who is he really? It seems like someone who has lied to so many for so long has to have extended his lies to his personal life. Who are his friends? Does he have a wife? Children? Is he a member of a church? Who does he donate to? Is he member of a club or civic organization? It just seems odd for him to have no life other than "consultant" or "expert".
Posted by:QuestionsSeptember 19, 2007 6:16:43 AMRespond ^
Congratulations, but there is much more to this story than has yet been told. Are you prepared to keep on keeping on?
Posted by:Morton StellingSeptember 19, 2007 1:04:05 PMRespond ^
caught with a Big Government Doughnut in his mouth, sounds like...
Posted by:BertSeptember 19, 2007 2:28:28 PMRespond ^
Alexis Debat sounds like a modern day "Tokoyo Rose" ! Not a cent of credibility left !
Posted by:ebrightdSeptember 21, 2007 9:33:38 AMRespond ^
This is an important story with much more to uncover. Never hurts to follow the money.
Posted by:Christina PlattSeptember 23, 2007 8:31:06 AMRespond ^
Krepinevich claims that his CSBA, the Nixon Center, and ABC all are in the information business. That's debatable, possibly even erroneous. But, his claim that these group add value to the information they either acquire or generate is simply ridiculous. At most, they add so much opinion to slant the recipient/viewer to their way of knowing the world until the excrement put out is absolutely worthless. It's called government sourced propaganda, like the ABC 9/11 movie for TV and the PNAC Manifesto. For the most part, these thinktank possuers get away with supplanting true information and real news with this banal infotainment or corporate service announcements that little more than peddle and parrot the thinking of the ruling regime. Think OJ Simpson in Vegas versus belated news coverage of the Jena6. Or, reality TV on A&E, versus a documentary on LinkTV. The charade of quality in information goes virtually unnoticed and utterly unchallenged. This time, however, we clearly saw 'them' butt-naked on this one, and were neither entertained nor amused. And, their response has simply been to trot Danat out for a public flogging for our convenient placation. Therein lies the real problem. Danat, if anything, was a mere symptom of an issue which no one wants to address and resolve. It's too easy to aim all our phasers jammed on kill on Danat than to dissolve and rebuild the useless and corrupt information and intelligence gathering system that generates these Danat's type by the thousands almost hourly. It takes courage and conviction to credibly exert the effort and task the resources needful to commit to fixing our neolithically debilitated intelligence and information collection and disperal systems.
Posted by:PennySeptember 28, 2007 11:33:36 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS