Militant Marketing March

Corporate America is herding thousands of gays, lesbians, and other gender outlaws into DC on April 30 for the latest March on Washington. Is the event really about social change, or mass-marketing?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“We’re a movement, not a market!” a street full of women-lovin’ women chanted at last summer’s San Francisco Dyke March.

Don’t be so sure, ladies.

Judging by the advance materials for the upcoming April 30 Millennium March on Washington, gays and lesbians are high on corporate America’s ass-kissing list. Companies such as United Airlines, America Online, and DuPont Pharmaceuticals are showering hundreds of thousands of dollars on the event to ingratiate themselves to queers.

Meanwhile, unlike both previous gay marches on Washington, this one is pushing no political agenda at all in this city of influence. So what’s the point?

Perhaps the march’s website (hosted by “Presenting Sponsor” PlanetOut.com) puts it best: “Corporate sponsorship of the Millennium March on Washington offers extraordinary visibility, promotional and brand-building opportunities to companies looking to reach the affluent and loyal gay/lesbian market through the largest community event in history.”

“It’s an outrage!” foams Steve Ault, a national coordinator of both the 1979 and 1987 marches on Washington. “This is what we’ve turned into 30 years after Stonewall? We’re described as this commodity? We’re being sold?”

Apparently, yes. If you’re a marchgoer, United Airlines, “Official Airline of the March,” is ready to offer you “super service and a great fare” when you mention the march on a toll-free number. That’s the same United that was, until recently, being bitterly boycotted for denying employees domestic partner benefits. A month in advance, the “great fare” from San Francisco to DC was $543.42 per person.

The MMOW organizers who arranged this sponsorship extravaganza, will receive “hotel commissions” from its hospitality partners: local DC hotels like the Wyndham City Center, the Omni Shoreham, and the Crown Plaza.

“Does it all come down to dollars? Will the next event be brought to us by whoever’s out of favor with the LBGT community to rehabilitate their image?” asks Nadine Smith, director of Equality Florida and co-chair of the 1993 march.

What’s a grassroots queer to do? These days, capitalism is in, and being oppressed is o-v-e-r.

Martín Ornelas-Quintero of the Latino/a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Organization (LLEGÓ), a staunch supporter of the Millenium March, insists corporate sponsorship isn’t necessarily bad. “We’ve never been in a position before to enter into corporate support,” he says. “That’s no reason not to do it. We just know that times change.”

“It’s hard to be a purist given the fiscal realities of being an organizer,” says queer activist and author Urvashi Vaid. “Everything we do depends on money. I’m not so disdainful of underwriting because the right wing has had it for years.” The annual AIDS Rides — fundraising bicycle marathons from New York-to-Boston, San Francisco-to-Los Angeles and elsewhere — raise millions of dollars annually for GLBT health centers, Vaid notes, and they’re sponsored by gin maker Tanqueray. (There has, however, been considerable controversy over how much of the money actually raised for the AIDS rides winds up in the pockets of organizers.)

Vaid remains cynical about corporate motives. “I don’t read sponsorships automatically as a sign of anything more than people recognizing there’s money to be made out of our niche.”

Why, exactly, gender outlaws are supposed to be marching right now anyway is unclear. This will be the first GLBT March on Washington with exactly zero political demands, eerily reminiscent of its new-media sponsors’ business MO: ever higher buzz-to-substance ratios.

“A march on Washington is a very special tool. It can have enormous impact, but you don’t do it readily,” says Ault. “The Millennium March is artificial. There is no compelling reason to march on Washington at this time.”

The march has also been bedevilled by controversy over how it was organized, with grassroots groups accusing the DC-based leadership of leaving them out of the planning. Some prominent groups are unmistakably snubbing the march. ACT-UP New York, for example, sent a busload of activists to the upcoming World Bank/IMF protests in mid-April — but will boycott the MMOW.

Still, plenty of queers will show up on April 30. Estimates from both sides of the debate put attendance at several hundred thousand. That would make it about the same size people-wise as previous marches — but political success is another matter.

“I think people are going for the parties and the rock concert but not for the politics,” Vaid says. Even so, attorney Kate Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights points out, “If you can mobilize half a million people to converge in one place, that can’t help but create a momentum for social change.”

Whatever the outcome, scoring corporate support on the scale of the Millenium March is a coup of some sort for queers. But it raises a troubling question that won’t go away as the GLBT movement forays further into realpolitik: Are queers subverting capitalism? Or is it the other way around?

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate