Read Justice Sotomayor’s Powerful Dissent in the Latest Battle Over the Death Penalty

“We have stopped being a civilized nation and accepted barbarism.”

Jay Mallin/Zuma

Billy Ray Irick, a 59-year-old Tennessee death row inmate, is scheduled to die Thursday night for the 1985 rape and murder of seven-year-old Paula Dyer. In February, Irick and dozens of other Tennessee death row inmates filed a lawsuit against the state arguing that its new lethal injection cocktail, which includes the controversial sedative Midazolam that has been blamed for several botched executions, would be tantamount to torture.  

Just hours before his execution was set to begin, the US Supreme Court denied his stay of application, allowing the state to move forward. The court did not indicate how all the members voted, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a grim six-page dissent. 

“In refusing to grant Irick a stay, the Court today turns a blind eye to a proven likelihood that the State of Tennessee is on the verge of inflicting several minutes of torturous pain on an inmate in its custody,” Justice Sotomayor wrote.

In the lawsuit, experts warned that Midazolam was not sufficiently powerful to prevent inmates from feeling pain from the second drug, a paralyzer, and the third drug, which stops the heart. Ultimately, the inmates lost their case because they were unable to prove that there was a less painful way to carry out the executions or that the drugs could be considered cruel and unusual punishment. 

But Sotomayor disagreed. “If the law permits this execution to go forward in spite of the horrific final minutes that Irick may well experience,” she wrote, “then we have stopped being a civilized nation and accepted barbarism.”

Read her complete dissent here:

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.