Will Merrick Garland Save Obama’s Climate Legacy?

The Supreme Court nominee has a good reputation with environmental law scholars.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP


On Wednesday morning, President Barack Obama announced he will nominate Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last month, on the Supreme Court.

Garland, who is currently chief judge of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, has an excruciating path to confirmation. He faces entrenched opposition from Senate Republicans, who have vowed to block anyone Obama appoints to the seat. As my colleague Stephanie Mencimer put it, “Garland is a political sacrificial lamb for the White House.”

But if Garland is somehow confirmed, one of his first big cases he could determine the fate of Obama’s signature climate change policy.

“In terms of looking for someone who would give a fair hearing [to the Clean Power Plan], he’s a big shift from Scalia,” one environmental law scholar said.

Shortly before Scalia’s death, SCOTUS placed a hold on the Clean Power Plan—a regulation from the Environmental Protection Agency that aims to slash greenhouse gas emissions from power plants—while lower courts rule on its legality. The plan is being challenged by two dozen coal-reliant states and will likely wind up before the Supreme Court sometime next year.

Garland’s record should offer some optimism for environmentalists who are hopeful the Court will uphold the Clean Power Plan. According to SCOTUSblog, Garland has a history of taking the green side of regulatory disputes: “Judge Garland has in a number of cases favored contested EPA regulations and actions when challenged by industry, and in other cases he has accepted challenges brought by environmental groups.” In other words, Garland has often stood by the EPA when its rules were challenged by industry groups, and stood by environmentalists when they thought EPA actions hadn’t been strong enough.

Richard Lazarus, an environmental law scholar at Harvard University, said that Garland is highly respected in the environmental law community.

“No one would say Garland is a hardened environmentalist,” he said. Still, “we think we’ll get a straight shot from him. He doesn’t come with any inherent skepticism about the federal government overreaching [on environmental regulation]. In terms of looking for someone who would give a fair hearing [to the Clean Power Plan], he’s a big shift from Scalia.”

We’ll be digging into Garland’s environmental record more as his confirmation moves forward (or doesn’t); stay tuned.

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

FACT:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2019 demands.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.