Yet Another Group of Scientists Just Said We Are the Ones Screwing the Weather

“We have created a new climate.”

Tomwang112/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For the first time in the six years the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society has published its annual extreme event report, it has found that certain events could not have happened without human-caused climate warming. Weather researchers say that in 2016, climate change led to record global heat, extreme temperatures across Asia, and a marine heat wave off the coast of Alaska called “the blob.

“These are not just new odds, these are new weather extremes made possible by a new climate,” said Jeff Rosenfeld, the bulletin’s editor-in-chief, during a press conference at the American Geophysical Union fall meeting in New Orleans. “We have created a new climate.”

Scientists from all over the world contributed to this report, with studies analyzing 21 different events in 2016, from US snowstorms and South African drought, to ocean hot spots and Arctic warmth. Only six of the 27 papers in the report did not point to climate change as a significant driver of extreme weather events. 

“It’s important to remember that climate change does not act alone,” said Stephanie Herring, a scientist with NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information and one of the report’s editors, during the press conference announcing the findings. “Natural variability is still a player in all extreme events.”

When scientists try to assess the role of climate change in an extreme weather event, they attempt to calculate its likelihood with greenhouse gas emissions at current levels. Scientists then compare this result to a “control” model, which is of a world unaffected by human climate change.

“The estimates we give are often quite conservative,” said Andrew King, a climate extremes research fellow at Australia’s Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science. He authored one of the few studies included in the report that found natural variability, not climate change, drove extreme weather—in this case a record wet winter in southeast Australia. “For scientists to say that an event would be virtually impossible without climate change, they are very sure.”

All the papers submitted to the report are selected before editors know whether human-caused climate change influenced the event. But, says Herring, some events, heat waves, for instance, are easier to connect with the phenomenon than others, like tornadoes. 

Complicating matters in 2016 was El Niño, the periodic warming in the eastern and central tropical Pacific waters, which figured prominently in weather patterns and atmospheric conditions. One paper found that human-caused climate change strengthened El Niño in the central equatorial Pacific Ocean. South Africa’s drought and food scarcity, another study concluded, was worsened by climate change-enhanced El Niño.

During a time when many in power challenge the notion that human activity contributes to climate change, Rosenfeld said scientists have known for years humans are changing the risk of some extreme events. Now, they have more compelling evidence. 

“This report marks a fundamental change,” he said. “We can no longer be shy about talking about the connection between causes of climate change and weather.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate