Scott Pruitt May Have Violated Oklahoma Ethics Rules as a State Senator

The current EPA administrator used a shell company to buy a house—at a deep discount.

Scott PruittCarolyn Kaster/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt used a shell company in 2003 to buy a home in Oklahoma from a retiring lobbyist, according to an investigation by the New York Times.

At the time, Pruitt was a state senator in Oklahoma. The shell company was registered to his business associate and law school friend Kenneth Wagner, now a senior adviser at the EPA. The mortgage for the home was issued by a local bank that was helmed by another current EPA adviser, Albert Kelly, who has since been banned from working in finance due to a banking violation.

The shell company acquired the home in 2003 for $375,000, about $100,000 less than the lobbyist had paid a year earlier for it, and sold it two years later for about $470,000. Pruitt did not disclose the profit or the shell company in his financial filings at the time, which, according to the Times, is a possible breach of state ethics rules.

An EPA spokeswoman told the Times that Pruitt’s business activities with Wagner and Kelly “were ethical” and that his involvement with the shell company “was a simple real estate investment.”

The report comes as Pruitt faces calls to resign over his extravagant spending habits at the EPA, which has included doling out more than $200,000 for first-class trips with his security detail. This month, the Government Accountability Office said the administrator violated federal law by purchasing a $43,238 soundproof privacy booth to make phone calls in his office.

Pruitt is also under fire for renting a Capitol Hill condominium from the wife of lobbyist J. Steven Hart. On Friday, the Hill reported that at the beginning of 2018, Hart had “reached out to the EPA on behalf of a client—despite claiming he hadn’t lobbied the agency in the last two years.” On Saturday, the Times reported that Hart also met with Pruitt last year.

For more on Pruitt’s spending and his past in Oklahoma, check out Rebecca Leber’s recent profile of the embattled EPA administrator. 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate