Pruitt Is Gone. His Replacement Continues His Destructive Work.

The new coal-friendly EPA administrator gutted another Obama-era pollution rule.

A hand covered in wet coal ash from the Dan River, which was contaminated after a spill in North CarolinaGerry Broome/AP

Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency rolled back Obama-era regulations that had protected drinking water from being contaminated with coal ash, the toxic byproduct of burning coal. Although the coal industry is heralding it as a win, environmentalists say the new rule poses a serious health risk.

“This administration is doing everything it can to give coal a free ride, including dismantling our bare minimum protections,” Larissa Liebmann, staff attorney at Waterkeeper Alliance, said in a statement.

For decades, the toxic product was dumped into unlined ponds that have the potential to leak and contaminate the drinking water in nearby communities. It was also discarded into landfills, where the wind could blow the ash into the air and further spread the toxic arsenic and mercury it contains. Those who live near disposal sites are at increased risk of cancer, heart disease, stroke, and, for children, brain damage.

A 2016 environmental justice report from the US Commission on Civil Rights found that nonwhite and low-income communities are disproportionately affected by coal ash disposal sites. The biggest coal ash disaster to date occurred in 2008, when a retaining wall surrounding the Kingston Fossil Plant in Tennessee collapsed and released more than 1 billion gallons of coal ash into two rivers. The ash mixed with the river and created a toxic sludge that destroyed or damaged 40 homes in a middle-class, mostly white neighborhood. The cleanup involved transporting the toxic waste to a landfill hundreds of miles away in Uniontown, Alabama, a small, predominantly black town where nearly half the residents are living in poverty. 

In 2015, the Obama administration implemented a new rule that required groundwater testing near coal ash ponds and created standards for constructing the ponds to contain the material. But President Donald Trump’s EPA has eased the requirements: The new rule will allow industry officials to suspend groundwater monitoring at certain sites if the plant can prove it isn’t polluting the groundwater. This “opens the door for weakened monitoring,” said Lisa Hallowell, senior attorney at the Environmental Integrity Project. The rollback also extends the deadline for closing ash ponds that are leaking. Companies were originally required to clean up the leaking ponds by the end of this year, but now the EPA has extended that requirement until 2020. 

The new coal ash rule is Andrew Wheeler’s first major act since taking the reigns from Scott Pruitt, who resigned earlier this month. Before joining the EPA in April, Wheeler was employed by Faegre Baker Daniels, a consulting firm that lobbied on behalf of energy companies that were against the Obama-era coal ash requirements. Wheeler said the new rule would save $28 to $31 million a year in regulatory costs. “These amendments provide states and utilities much-needed flexibility in the management of coal ash, while ensuring human health and the environment are protected,” he said in a statement announcing the new rule.

This action seems to confirm that Wheeler intends to follow in the footsteps of his predecessor, who frequently angered environmentalists by focusing on deregulation at the expense of the environment. To Hallowell, the gutting of the Obama-era rule “cements the shameful environmental legacy of the Trump administration.”

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.