The Surprising Science of Fighting Crime With…Trees

A growing body of research suggests greenery may make cities safer.

Dom Civiello

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When the Ida B. Wells housing project opened on Chicago’s South Side in 1941, its up-to-date kitchens and grassy lawns drew more than 1,500 black families looking for somewhere decent to settle. But over the decades, the project fell into disrepair: The grass turned to mud, and in an effort to reduce dust and maintenance costs, the city paved over many of the development’s green spaces, killing its trees. By the 1980s, the project was rife with gang warfare and drugs.

The loss of greenery may have had something to do with its decline. In 2001, environmental researchers at the University of Illinois published a landmark study on crime rates in different sections of the Wells project. By comparing aerial photos and police crime reports, the researchers calculated that buildings still surrounded by lots of foliage saw 48 percent fewer property crimes, on average, and 56 percent fewer violent crimes than buildings with low levels of vegetation. To be clear, the analysis didn’t prove the trees caused the phenomenon. But in the nearly two decades since, a small but growing body of research has supported the idea that trees may have a calming effect on crime.

City managers have long known about the benefits of greenery. According to the US Forest Service, urban trees help save energy, lead to better air and water quality, reduce stormwater runoff, store carbon, and increase property values. In California, for example, urban trees—all 173 million of them—provide an estimated $8.3 billion in environmental services every year, according to a 2017 study by researchers from the Forest Service and the University of California-Davis. And a major 2019 study of nearly 1 million Danish people showed that kids who grew up near green spaces had a lower risk of psychiatric disorders later in life.

But beyond that, some cities are beginning to explore urban greening as a way to increase residents’ safety, especially in low-income, blighted areas. In Philadelphia, researchers in 2018 produced a randomized trial that included more than 500 vacant lots. One-third were “cleaned and greened” with trees and grass. One-third were only cleaned, with no greenery added, and one-third were left alone. Of the lots that received either treatment, researchers observed statistically significant reductions in overall crime and burglaries over a 38-month period, including a 29 percent drop in gun violence in neighborhoods below the poverty line. If they scaled the treatment across the entire city, the authors noted, it could translate to more than 350 fewer shootings each year.

Researchers picked up on a similar trend in Cincinnati, where the emerald ash borer, an invasive beetle, forced authorities to remove 646 dead or dying ash trees between 2007 and 2014. City records helped reveal that tree loss was associated with an uptick in property crimes, assaults, and violent crimes.

What, exactly, makes foliage a possible deterrent to delinquency? For the most part, it’s still an unexplained phenomenon. But researchers have come up with a few ideas. Some say trees might signal that the area is well cared for, similar to the “broken windows” theory, which suggests that disorder invites crime (though there is no scientific consensus on this relationship). Some say green spaces make an area inviting and can lead to more informal surveillance, or “eyes on the street.” Other theories point to the welldocumented calming effect of vegetation, or the idea that greenery promotes trust within a community.

“This is a subliminal thing,” says Geoffrey Donovan, an economist at the Forest Service who helped write a 2012 study that found trees on the street were associated with crime reduction in southeast Portland, Oregon. (The results were mixed for trees in yards.) “It’s not like somebody with a little mask is creeping up to, you know, burglarize your house and they see a tree and go, ‘Oh, big-leaf maple!’ and run away,” he says.

Even if the cause and effect are still murky, it’s hard to argue against giving trees a try. Conventional crime prevention, like hiring more police officers and incarcerating people, is “immensely expensive,” says Michelle Kondo, a social scientist at the Forest Service and an author of the Philadelphia study. The city only spent about $5 per square meter to green each lot. For a 29 percent reduction in gun violence, that’s a pretty amazing return on investment.

Philadelphia is one of few cities exploring the effect of green space on crime. As Kenton Rogers, the co-founder of Treeconomics, a UK-based firm that quantifies the benefit of urban trees, points out, it’s difficult for city managers to estimate how much a single tree contributes to crime reduction, unlike, say, measuring the amount of carbon it can sequester. Still, according to Kondo, cities including New Orleans; Camden, New Jersey; and Flint, Michigan, are all trying to measure how urban greening may make their communities safer.

In Chicago, it’s uncertain if adding trees could have helped the Ida B. Wells project. In 2002, a year after the University of Illinois researchers published their paper, Chicago began demolishing the apartments. Now it’s part of Oakwood Shores, a mixed-income community. Activists just raised the funds to build a monument honoring Wells, the investigative journalist and civil rights leader after whom the project was named, amid a stand of oak trees.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate