Tom’s Kitchen: Ice Cream to Melt the Blues

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/legumeandthelady/3366449201/">Penelope the Library Cat</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Somewhere, there exists a photo of three-year-old me with an ice cream cone crammed by my tiny fist into my face, which is marked with dark splotches of Rocky Road. My expression is focused, beatific, like that of a religious fanatic at prayer. To this day, I remember howls of adult laughter echoing around me. I didn’t give a damn—what mattered was getting that creamy, crunchy, sweet stuff into my mouth.

I try to play it cooler these days, but the joy I take in the famed cold confection has changed little. I don’t eat ice cream everyday, as my three-year-old self vowed I would once I threw off the yolk of adult meddling. But I do love a little of it it now and then, especially when I’m feeling dented.

But not just any ice cream. When I really need ice cream therapy, I like to make it myself. With just a simple piece of equipment—an inexpensive ice cream maker with a freezable mixing bowl, plus an instant-read thermometer—you, too, can make your own ice cream without much fuss. I have for years used a an older version of this $60 Cuisinart model, which can often be found for super-cheap at thrift shops (since not everyone is obsessed enough to actually make ice cream after obtaining a maker).

Now, good ice cream is perfectly smooth, and the scourge of the home ice cream enthusiast is little frozen crystals. But if you follow a couple of tips—properly heating the custard and adding a little bit of liquor at the end to raise the custard’s freezing point—then you should be fine.

What follows is my recipe for my favored ultimate blues-chasing ice cream flavor: straight-ahead chocolate. My main influence over the years has been Cook’s Illustrated articles on ice cream I read in the 1990s.

Chocolate Ice Cream
2 cups whole milk, preferably from grass-fed cows
2 bars (7 oz total) of good-quality, Fair Trade dark chocolate, at least 60 percent cocoa
1/3 cup unsweetened cocoa powder
1 cup heavy cream, preferably from grass-fed cows, well-chilled
5 free-range eggs, yolks and whites separated, whites saved for another use
1/2 cup raw, organic cane sugar
1 pinch of your best coarse sea salt
1 tablespoon good-quality vodka

Chop the chocolate into fine pieces, and place them in a small metal bowl. Set up a double boiler by placing a the chocolate-containing bowl over a saucepan with an inch of lightly simmering water, and let it melt, stirring occasionally. Remove it from the heat when it’s melted. Meanwhile, combine the 2 cups of milk with the cocoa in a medium sauce pan and turn heat to medium. Whisk constantly to combine the cocoa and milk, while bringing the mixture to about 140 degrees. Turn heat off.

Now put the egg yolks in yet another mid-size metal bowl, add the sugar, and whisk vigorously until the sugar and eggs are well combined. Next you’re going to “temper” the yolks—bring their temperature up slowly in preparation for making the custard. If they heat too fast, you’ll get scrambled eggs. To do this, take a ladle and grab a bit of the hot milk from the saucepan and add it to the to the yolks, stirring as you pour. Add a little more, continuing to stir; and a little more; and a little more still, stirring the whole while. Now dump the bowl with the now-warm egg-milk mixture into the saucepan with the rest of the hot milk. Using a spatula to scrape, add the melted chocolate, plus the pinch of salt, and stir to combine. Turn heat to medium-low, and stirring constantly, cook the mixture until it thickens, bringing it to about 175 degrees. Pour it over a fine strainer into a container that can hold it with room to spare.

Immediately pour the cold cream into the custard, and stir to combine. This will immediately stop it from cooking, as well as help it cool faster. Add the vodka and stir again. Cover and let it chill for several hours in the fridge until it is 40 degrees or lower. (You can speed the cooling process by putting the custard in yet another metal bowl and placing it over a larger bowl with plenty of ice and salt, thus creating an ice bath.)

Freeze according to your ice cream maker’s instructions, and enjoy.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate