GOP Senator Says Trump’s Deranged Crowdstrike Conspiracy Theory Might Be Correct

Donald Trump with then-Senate candidate John Kennedy (R-La.) in December 2016Andrew Harnik/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

An influential Republican senator on Sunday lent credence to President Donald Trump’s deranged “Crowdsrike” conspiracy theory—the debunked notion that the Democratic National Committee, with help from Ukraine, fabricated the 2016 Russian hacking operation. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) claimed during a Fox News Sunday interview that neither he nor anyone else knows whether it was Russia or Ukraine that stole Democratic emails during the campaign. The is simply untrue: The US intelligence community has definitely concluded that the Russian government directed the hacking.

On Fox, host Chris Wallace played a video of Trump claiming last week that the DNC “gave the server to Crowdstrike,” a cybersecurity firm that the president said was “owned by a very wealthy Ukrainian.” Trump added, “I still wanna see that server. You know, the FBI has never gotten that server.” Virtually every word of this was false, as Mother Jones’ Dan Friedman explained:

This is a nonsense conspiracy theory…Crowdstrike, based in California, is not owned by a wealthy Ukrainian. The DNC did not have one server. They had about 140. Crowdstrike imaged them and then gave the data to the FBI, not Ukraine. Trump’s claim is part of a false argument that Ukraine, not Russia, meddled in the 2016 election. Russia, which US intelligence agencies have concluded interfered in the 2016 election, has promoted the lie that Ukraine was responsible.

Wallace then asked Kennedy, “Who do you believe was responsible for hacking the DNC and Clinton campaign computers—their emails? Was it Russia or Ukraine?”

“I don’t know,” Kennedy responded. “Nor do you. Nor do any of us.”

Wallace then noted that the “entire intelligence community says it was Russia.”

“Right, but it could also be Ukraine,” Kennedy shot back. “I’m not saying that I know one way or the other.”

Trump has repeatedly attempted to undermine the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help him win—most famously during a joint press conference last year with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki. The president’s obsession with Crowdstrike has now become a key element of the ongoing impeachment crisis. He pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate this conspiracy theory during their July 25 call. Last month, acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney seemed to acknowledge that Trump had suspended military aid to Ukraine in an effort to get Zelensky to probe the “corruption related to the DNC server.” Mulvaney later tried to walk back that admission.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.