Good News, Bad News

The bad news: no blogging from me on Sunday.  Sorry about that.  The good news: in its place, several thousand steaming words on marijuana legalization were produced for the summer issue of the magazine.  You can’t wait to read them, can you?

By coincidence, one of the things I puzzled over a bit while I was researching my piece was the total size of the cannabis business in the United States.  Basically, the numbers I saw didn’t seem to make much sense, but since I wasn’t planning to use them anyway I didn’t bother trying to track down the problem.  Perhaps in honor of 4/20, though, Michael Hiltzik did it for me:

Let’s start, as [Jon] Gettman did, with a standard quantification of U.S. domestic cultivation today: 10,000 metric tons, or 22 million pounds. This figure has a curious history. It first appeared in a 2003 report by the Bush White House. Yet, as Gettman observed, that was nearly triple the estimate of 3,500 metric tons the feds had been using for years.

….The government backpedaled in 2007, when the Justice Department estimated the domestic crop at 5,650 to 9,417 metric tons. That’s a huge margin — like saying the distance from L.A. to New York is between 1,000 and 6,000 miles.

….Gettman acknowledges that concrete information is exceedingly scarce in this field. “When you drill down, the only hard fact is they seize a lot of plants,” he said.

The “soft facts” include the size in dollars of the U.S. marijuana market. Gettman’s 2007 estimate of $113 billion is in the stratosphere compared with some others. In a 2001 report, the federal government pegged the black market at $10.5 billion, a discrepancy that suggests either that we became a nation of total potheads over the following few years, that pot prices experienced an inflation rate that would make the rise in college tuition look sick, or that somebody’s numbers are way off.

In other words, no one really knows.  Which doesn’t surprise me.  One of the things I’ve found out over the past few weeks is that virtually all of the research related to cannabis is, perhaps fittingly, sort of hazy.  The research is hard to do, it often points in contradictory directions, and natural experiments are hard to come by.  We know a fair amount, but our confidence level in what we know isn’t all that great.

But enjoy 4/20 anyway.  Just don’t blog while high, OK?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.