Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


From Alan Greenspan, on the size of U.S. banks:

If they’re too big to fail, they’re too big.

Interesting.  On the one hand, Greenspan is really on the side of the angels here.  “I don’t think merely raising the fees or capital on large institutions or taxing them is enough,” he says.  If they’re too big, we need to just chop ’em down to size.  On the other hand, he’s also using this as an opportunity to slag his successors for creating the moral hazard of too-big-to-fail in the first place: “When push came to shove, they didn’t stand up,” he says of the decision last year to rescue Fannie, Freddie, and AIG.  But it’s pretty hard to believe that if Greenspan had still been Fed chair at the time, he would have risked allowing the financial system to melt down.  And the “Greenspan put” predates the “Bernanke put” by many years.

Still and all, it’s interesting that Greenspan, of all people, is willing to endorse an idea that’s apparently too radical for current officeholders to even think about.  It’s sort of like all those out-of-office Republicans who say they’re in favor of healthcare reform now.  I guess it’s a lot easier to buck the tide when you’re not the one holding the bag.

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate