How Affordable Is Your Neighborhood?

Via Atrios, the Center for Neighborhood Technology has released an updated survey of affordable housing that takes into account transportation costs as well as rent and mortgage costs. Their conclusion: there’s a lot less affordable housing out there than we think:

Under the conventional definition, 30% or less of household income, 69% of U.S. communities have average housing costs that are considered “affordable” to the typical household. But in almost all metro regions of the country, when the definition of affordability includes both housing and transportation costs (at 45% of income), the number of communities considered affordable for typical households plummets, often dramatically. Across the country, only 40% of U.S. communities are affordable to the typical household when transportation costs are included.

They include a map that calculates affordability for 330 metro areas in the U.S., which means that 80% of you can check out the affordability of your neighborhood. Mine is on the right. Not very affordable! Which isn’t too surprising since it boasts both expensive housing and high transportation costs. In fact, I’m surprised it’s as affordable as it is.

This kind of calculation seems like a good idea, but I guess I’m left with one question: where did the 45% benchmark for affordability come from? I know these things are always a bit arbitrary, but if instead you went from 30% (without transportation costs) to, say, 50% (with transportation costs), overall affordability might end up looking about the same as it is now. So who came up with 15% as the magic number for how much transportation ought to cost?

In any case, if you’re thinking of moving, the map might be kind of useful. Obviously your personal costs will depend on exactly what kind of place you live in and what kind of commuting you do (my personal affordability index is pretty awesome, for example, since all I do is walk down the stairs to go to work), but it’s not a bad idea to see the numbers in black and white anyway. A lot of people with average commuting and recreational patterns don’t calculate how much this actually costs, and the map forces you to take this stuff seriously. It’s worth a look.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.