The Great Netflix Shaft

The latest from Netflix:

Netflix Inc. boosted by 60% the price of its cheapest movie-rental plan that includes streaming and DVD rentals, triggering an outcry among customers who still use the disc format despite the growing popularity of online movies.

Am I missing something here? Of course there’s an outcry from customers who still — still! — use prehistoric disc technology. I’ve been a Netflix customer for about a year, ever since the last DVD rental place around here pulled up stakes, and the reason I still rent discs is because the selection of streaming movies on Netflix is pathetic. At a guess, I’d say that when I go to look for a title, it’s available in streaming format about 10% of the time. The other 90% of the time I have no choice but to get the disc.

So how can anyone, least of all Netflix themselves, supposedly be surprised that discs remain popular? Again, am I missing something here?

On a related topic, this is a crappy way to treat customers. When I signed up for Netflix, I remember thinking that they were just trying to lure customers in with a low price that would suddenly jump when enough people had gotten used to the service and would either (a) not notice the price hike or (b) just shrug and keep their subscriptions due to inertia. But I confess that it never occurred to me that Netflix would suddenly jack up their price 60%. Credit for moxie, I guess.

On the other hand, I imagine it’s going to work great. They’ll get some griping and some cancellations, but nowhere near enough to eat into the higher revenue from the price hike. Whether they’ll continue to grow at a decent clip at this new price point is another question.

UPDATE: Interesting comments. The most common is that I shouldn’t be blaming Netflix, I should be blaming the studios, who are in the process of jacking up their contract demands in order to get their hands on a bigger piece of the distribution pie.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.