Who Are We Talking To?

Membership Ticker

HELP US
REACH
1,000!

Tomorrow is the last day of our Spring Membership Drive, and we’ve raised just 400 of our 1,000-donation goal. That gap is real and concerning—and so is what’s at stake. Every investigation we pursue, every story we refuse to drop, is funded by readers like you. The truth needs defenders. Will you be one?

Help us reach 1,000! Tomorrow is the last day of our Spring Membership Drive, and we’ve raised just 400 of our 1,000-donation goal. That gap is real and concerning—and so is what’s at stake. Every investigation we pursue, every story we refuse to drop, is funded by readers like you. The truth needs defenders. Will you be one?

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

Via Andrew Sullivan, Alex Goldmark directs us to the the MIT Senseable City Lab’s Connected States of America mapping project, which sports an interactive map showing who we talk and text to. The map wouldn’t show Orange County for some reason, so I tried Los Angeles instead. Two things immediately jumped out at me:

Connection volume seems to be a pretty simple combination of geography (we know more people near us) and population density (we know more people in big cities because big cities just have more people).
The maps are surprisingly similar for both call and text volume. Should I have expected them to be different? Maybe not, but I did.

Of course, there are also a few weirdnesses. Why so many calls and texts to Codington County, South Dakota, and Tulsa, Oklahoma? Big call centers? What about Fayette, Tennessee?