The EPA’s “Covert Propaganda” Campaign Explained

The GAO has blown the whistle on the EPA:

The Environmental Protection Agency engaged in “covert propaganda” and violated federal law when it blitzed social media to urge the public to back an Obama administration rule intended to better protect the nation’s streams and surface waters, congressional auditors have concluded….Federal laws prohibit agencies from engaging in lobbying and propaganda.

That sounds bad. What on earth did the EPA do? Tap into people’s phones? Beam subliminal messages through their TV sets? Conduct giant rallies in Nuremburg?

After months of investigation, it turns out that the GAO identified a grand total of two problems. One concerns a public affairs guy who wrote a blog post that linked to another blog post about surfing which in turn linked to yet another page which urged people to call their congressional rep. Apparently this counts as “lobbying Congress.” It’s obviously pretty trivial, though.

The second violation is more interesting. As part of a social media campaign, the EPA sent out the following message on Thunderclap: “Clean water is important to me. I support EPA’s efforts to protect it for my health, my family and my community.” Thunderclap is sort of like Kickstarter for messages: you set a goal for people to resend your message, and if you reach your goal then the message is sent out at the same time by everyone who signed up.

So what’s the problem? Well, the GAO acknowledges that “The page was visibly attributed to EPA, as it displayed the agency’s profile photo and, under the title, ‘by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.'” But—when Thunderclap users resent the message, it might not have been clear that it was originally created by the EPA. Thus it’s “covert” propaganda.

I have a hard time getting too exercised by this, but I guess it’s good for federal agencies to know the limits of social media promotion. Just keep this in mind when you start hearing dark stories about how the EPA engaged in lobbying and propaganda. These two things are what that means. Not exactly the dark arts practiced by Joseph Goebbels.


We recently wrapped up the crowdfunding campaign for our ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project, and it was a smashing success. About 10,364 readers pitched in with donations averaging $45, and together they contributed about $467,374 toward our $500,000 goal.

That's amazing. We still have donations from letters we sent in the mail coming back to us, so we're on pace to hit—if not exceed—that goal. Thank you so much. We'll keep you posted here as the project ramps up, and you can join the hundreds of readers who have alerted us to corruption to dig into.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.