Why I Hate Video, Part 548


The end of the written word is nigh:

Facebook is predicting the end of the written word on its platform. In five years time Facebook “will be definitely mobile, it will be probably all video,” said Nicola Mendelsohn, who heads up Facebook’s operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, at a conference in London this morning. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s CEO, has already noted that video will be more and more important for the platform. But Mendelsohn went further, suggesting that stats showed the written word becoming all but obsolete, replaced by moving images and speech.

“The best way to tell stories in this world, where so much information is coming at us, actually is video,” Mendelsohn said. “It conveys so much more information in a much quicker period. So actually the trend helps us to digest much more information.”

Well, the demise of the written word may be happening sooner rather than later around here, thanks to a “scheduled” power outage from our friends at Southern California Edison. Last time this happened, power was back up in less than an hour. This time, who knows? They claim power will be out all day. That’s far longer than the battery life of either my phone or my tablet, so the written word is likely to die here in just a few hours.

In the meantime, I’ll take issue with the bolded part of Mendelsohn’s comment. Video has many benefits, but information density generally isn’t one of them. In fact, it’s the very reason I loathe video. I can read the transcript of a one-hour speech in about five or ten minutes and easily pick out precisely what’s interesting and what’s not. With video, I have to slog through the full hour. Generally speaking, my habit is to never click a link that goes to video. It’s just such a waste of time.

Of course, my needs are far different than most people’s. I read/view stuff on the web in order to gather actual information that I can comment on. Most people couldn’t care less about that. They just want momentary entertainment, and video overtook print for that many decades ago.

Which is fine. But please, call it what it is. Don’t pretend to be doing the world a service by promoting a medium that helps us all “digest much more information.” That’s obvious claptrap.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.