Congressional Staffers Are Being Paid Less Than Ever

Membership Ticker

Monika Bauerlein, CEO

Dear reader,

Like you, we’ve been trying to process the head-spinning, norm-shattering impeachment developments. It’s going to take all we’ve got to stay grounded and focus on accountability, so I hope you'll read how we’re thinking about it—and that you'll support our journalism during the special Moment for Mother Jones campaign, when your donation will be matched, dollar for dollar, up to $500,000 total.

Mother Jones breaks down the head-spinning, norm-shattering impeachment news. Join us in the fight for accountability with a donation when your gift will be matched, dollar for dollar, up to $500,000 total.

I’ve had this in an open tab for a couple of days, but it’s too interesting to close out without sharing:

This is from Josh McCrain, a grad student at Emory. For some reason, salaries for congressional aides have been declining for the past two decades. (All figures are adjusted for inflation.) The only exception is for staff assistants, who can hardly be paid any less.

Why? I have no theories. Maybe in the same way that Silicon Valley engineers are attracted by stock options more than salary, congressional aides these days are attracted mostly by post-Congress lobbying opportunities. Anybody have any other ideas?