The True Market for Driverless Cars Is Everybody

This is not a driverless car. It's a FLYING CAR, which is infinitely cooler. It popped up while I was searching for "driverless car," and since driverless cars are visually kind of boring, I decided to use it instead.Ferrari via ZUMA

Atrios is unimpressed with self-driving delivery vehicles:

Like Segways, I think the usefulness of all of these self-driving ideas (even if they work!) is much more limited than people think….Self-driving vehicles have a “last 200 feet” problem, and delivery vehicles have a “last 20 feet” problem. Whether pizzas or groceries, if it doesn’t come right to my door it’s a lot less appealing.

FWIW, I agree—although it’s always possible that the Silicon Valley geniuses behind this have clever solutions that I haven’t thought of. Ditto for self-driving taxis and self-driving buses.

But forget all that. I think that the biggest market for self-driving cars by far will be—brace yourselves—ordinary people who like the idea of not having to drive their cars. That’s it. You tell your car where to go, and then spend the trip chattering on the phone or watching TV or posting nasty tweets or reading Eschaton. Lots of people claim that they actually like driving cars, but most of them are either lying or delusional. Even if you drive a Ferrari—in fact, especially if you drive a Ferrari—it’s just no fun driving on jammed freeways or packed city streets or long stretches of interstate highway. We’d all rather be doing other things.

So that’s it. Forget all the weird little applications that startup companies are pitching in order to sound cool. The real market is the 200 million ordinary folks who would just as soon spend their commuting time amusing themselves instead of cursing at traffic.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate