The Slow Art Movement Comes to Maryland

Johannes Schmitt-Tegge/DPA via ZUMA

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

Philip Kennicott, the Washington Post’s art and architecture critic, has a fascinating piece today about the new Glenstone museum in Potomac, Maryland. The Glenstone is part of something new to me:

It is self-consciously a museum built in the spirit of the nascent “slow art” movement, which is a reaction to larger forces afoot in the art market, democratic culture and the age of Instagrammable art.

….“We’ve all had the ‘Mona Lisa’ moment,” says Thomas Phifer, the architect who worked closely with the Raleses to design the 204,000-square-foot Pavilions. The “Mona Lisa” moment is a sense of despair at the impossibly crowded galleries of the Louvre in Paris, where the room devoted to the Mona Lisa is a scene of pure chaos as tour groups jostle and throng and sometimes shove one another in hopes of getting close enough to snap a cellphone picture of the world’s most famous painting. “You walk into that room and you’re with 400 of your closest friends and maybe you can get a glimpse of the Mona Lisa,” Phifer says of a pervasive and frustrating experience that is becoming more common at museums around the world.

Long story short, the Glenstone plans to restrict visitors to 400 per day so that people have plenty of room and plenty of time to appreciate what they’re seeing. There are some pretty obvious pros and cons to this approach, and they’re all discussed in interesting detail in the article.

The most obvious problem to me is a simple one: how do you best restrict access if you think too many visitors are ruining your museum? You can charge a lot, but that hardly seems fair to art lovers of limited incomes. (Glenstone has free admission.) You can make it first-come-first-serve, but that obviously creates its own set of unfairnesses. You could make visitors take a short test to weed out all the folks who are there not for any love of art, but just because some guidebook wrote it up, but that’s just stupid.

I have a different, more organic idea: ban tour buses. Would this work? A museum expert would have to weigh in. But it would cut back on visitors; it would eliminate a lot of people who don’t care about art but are just there because it’s a stop on the tour; and it would get rid of the horrid mini-throngs that wend their way mindlessly through the museum like rats through the stomachs of snakes. It sure seems like it’s worth a try. Hell, there are whole cities that I think should experiment with this.

But it also reduces revenue, and how does that get made up? I haven’t figured out that part yet.

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate