For five decades, Mother Jones has been exposing the corruption that the powerful would rather keep buried. That fight for the truth is at a pivotal point, and it takes readers like you to make it possible.We need to raise $200,000 this month to fuel fearless investigative journalism that can make a difference right now. Help us meet the moment, today.
$20,000
$200,000
To meet this moment, we need YOU. That fight for the truth is at a pivotal point, and it takes readers like you to make it possible.We need to raise $200,000 this month to fuel fearless investigative journalism that can make a difference right now. Help us meet the moment, today.
It turns out that Donald Trump’s election was good for business after all. Some businesses, anyway. A team of researchers reports that after Election Day lots of women suddenly decided they wanted long-acting birth control:
In 2015, the mean adjusted daily LARC [long-acting reversible contraception] insertion rate during the 30 business days before and inclusive of November 8 was 12.9 per 100 000 women vs 13.7 per 100 000 women during the subsequent 30 business days. The comparable mean adjusted daily LARC insertion rates before and after the 2016 presidential election were 13.4 per 100 000 women and 16.3 per 100 000 women, an increase of 21.6%.
The big question, of course, is why this happened. There are several possibilities:
Many women decided they didn’t want to raise children in a country that could elect Donald Trump president.
Women were afraid of a Handmaid’s Tale hellscape coming and wanted to prepare.
Women were afraid Trump would kill off Obamacare, so they wanted to get their LARC inserted for free while they could.
And we respect that! But maybe you’re of a mind to support our work directly instead? We’re working hard to deliver fierce, independent journalism you can’t find elsewhere. But we can’t do that without reader support—your support. Please chip in today.
We noticed you have an ad blocker on. Can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund Mother Jones' investigative journalism?