Boomers Are Hanging Onto CEO Positions Like Grim Death

Via a long string of sources starting with Tyler Cowen, here is a chart from Crist Kolder Associates:

What this means, roughly speaking, is that for the past 15 years big companies have been hiring CEOs who were born in 1960 and only 1960, give or take a couple of years. In other words, corporate boards are continuing to hire CEOs from the tail end of the baby boom generation come hell or high water. They simply don’t want to break the age barrier and start hiring Gen Xers.

This will change shortly, of course. There’s no choice. But it says something remarkable that apparently the boards of big corporations are really, really uncomfortable with putting their companies into the hands of Xers. So instead they’ve been hiring older and older CEOs, to the point where today the average CEO is being hired only a few years before they might be expected to retire.

So what, if anything, happens when this finally breaks down and a majority of big companies are finally run by Gen Xers? Beats me. But apparently there are a lot of boomers who really don’t want to find out.

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate