Prabin Ranabhat/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.

How effective are masks at containing the spread of coronavirus? A new study suggests they don’t have much effect.

But I have questions. I know this will sound like I’m just defending my pro-mask position, but I promise I’m not. If further research confirms the “meh” position, then that will become my position too. But my first question was: how was the testing done?

Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS–CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients

Patients were instructed to cough 5 times each onto a petri dish while wearing the following sequence of masks: no mask, surgical mask, cotton mask, and again with no mask.

I’m not too worried about the small sample size. It’s good enough for now. My second question is: how far away was the petri dish?

A petri dish (90 mm × 15 mm) containing 1 mL of viral transport media (sterile phosphate-buffered saline with bovine serum albumin, 0.1%; penicillin, 10 000 U/mL; streptomycin, 10 mg; and amphotericin B, 25 µg) was placed approximately 20 cm from the patients’ mouths….We do not know whether masks shorten the travel distance of droplets during coughing.

Hmmm. That’s eight inches. I don’t really understand that. If you’re going to bother doing this study at all, why not do a second test at two or three feet, which is far more applicable to the real world? After all, it’s possible that masks don’t reduce the volume of virus very much but do slow it down so it doesn’t get very far.

My skepticism also comes from personal experience. As someone with compromised breathing, I can report that when I wear a mask breathing gets a little harder. And if the mask reduces the volume of air reaching me, it surely must reduce virus transmission too. The coronavirus might be teensy, but N2 molecules are even teensier. But maybe I’m thinking about this wrong.

In any case, this seems like a study that should be fairly easy to replicate, and it really should be. In the meantime, I’ll urge everyone to use common sense. Even if you’re wearing a mask, you should cough or sneeze into your sleeve. This is a hard habit to get into for some, but as weird as it sounds you can develop the habit by practicing at home. Seriously. Just spend a couple of minutes a few times a day coughing into your sleeve. Eventually it becomes second nature.

Now all we have to do is get all 330 million of us to do this.

UPDATE: This paper has been retracted: “We had not fully recognized the concept of limit of detection (LOD) of the in-house reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction used in the study….Values below the LOD are unreliable and our findings are uninterpretable. Reader comments raised this issue after publication.”

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate