Freedom of Expression(R): Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity

A new book explores the battle between intellectual property and free speech.

We’re living in an age of intellectual-property rights run amok. Royalty collectors threaten to sue Girl Scout troops for dancing the Macarena. Textbook publishers nix excerpts of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech because they can’t afford to buy the rights from his heirs. Donald Trump trademarks not just the phrase “You’re fired!” but also his accompanying hand gesture, commonly known as pointing.

The problem here is greed, asserts Kembrew McLeod in this smart, amusing examination of the increasingly grubby clash between private property and free speech. McLeod, a professor, music critic, and prankster, has no objection to inventors and artists protecting their creations. Rather, he’s against the impulse to stake a claim on everything we read, sing, and hear. Laws originally intended to prevent plagiarism and theft are now being wielded “like a weapon” by corporations that think they can own things like hand gestures, dance moves, or musical notes. Such claims, he argues, “mock the idea of democracy, and they step on creativity.”

The music industry’s iron-fisted crackdown on sampling particularly irks McLeod, who sees the practice as the logical next step in the age-old musical tradition of borrowing. Things have gotten so out of hand that to pen a parody of “This Land Is Your Land”—a communalist anthem whose melody was openly cribbed from another musician—is to invite a lawsuit. Just ask the Internet cartoonists who used the Woody Guthrie tune in a satirical short about the 2004 campaign; the duo soon found themselves fighting off music-publishing executives’ lawyers.

To highlight the danger to free speech posed by copyright abuse, the mischievous McLeod actually trademarked the phrase “freedom of expression.” When AT&T then used “his” phrase in an ad without permission, McLeod feigned indignation—and threatened to sue.

Of course, when such suits actually reach a court of law, they can backfire. When Fox News sued Al Franken for satirizing its catchphrase “fair and balanced,” a judge literally laughed the case out of court. Eventually, McLeod argues, frivolous legal threats will only encourage more unauthorized appropriation. After all, he writes, “copyright bozo zealotry” has already bred a new army of fair-use activists.


The more we thought about how MoJo's journalism can have the most impact heading into the 2020 election, the more we realized that so many of today's stories come down to corruption: democracy and the rule of law being undermined by the wealthy and powerful for their own gain.

So we're launching a new Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption. We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We'll publish what we find as a major series in the summer of 2020, including a special issue of our magazine, a dedicated online portal, and video and podcast series so it doesn't get lost in the daily deluge of breaking news.

It's unlike anything we've done before and we've got seed funding to get started, but we're asking readers to help crowdfund this new beat with an additional $500,000 so we can go even bigger. You can read why we're taking this approach and what we want to accomplish in "Corruption Isn't Just Another Scandal. It's the Rot Beneath All of Them," and if you like how it sounds, please help fund it with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.