Film Review: Chicago 10

What do slick CGI and Rage Against the Machine have to do with 1968?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The first odd thing about Chicago 10 is the title. It’s a confusingly inflated reference to the Chicago 7 conspiracy trial that pitted a motley crew of seven counterculture figures including Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and Tom Hayden against, well, the Man. The decision to tack on three extras—Black Panther Bobby Seale (who was booted from the trial) and two defense attorneys—to an iconic label is one of many moments of unnecessary embellishment in the spirited yet messy new documentary by Brett Morgen.

Chicago 10 tells the story of the 1968 Chicago Democratic National Convention, the bloody police crackdown on the anti-war kids who protested it, and the subsequent trial, in which the protest organizers were accused of conspiring to incite a riot. Instead of the usual narrator and talking-head approach, the film uses a manic combination of archival footage and animated scenes based on the original courtroom transcripts (with voices supplied by Hank Azaria as Hoffman, Jeffrey Wright as Seale, and Liev Schreiber as lawyer William Kunstler). Jerry Rubin described the trial as a “cartoon show,” and the slick cgi scenes capture the defendants’ antics, the doddering judge, and Seale being bound, gagged, and ejected from the courtroom. It’s never clear what’s historically accurate and what’s been abridged or exaggerated, however. And the relentless ’90s soundtrack is baffling: Why play a Rage Against the Machine song as the backdrop for cops clubbing yippies when a little Jimi Hendrix would have done the trick?

Despite its gimmicky attempts to appeal to non-boomers, Chicago 10 is still weirdly enjoyable. The story of the Chicago 7 still resonates today, and the clips of Hoffman’s sarcastic quips and pranks are charming. Morgen’s award-winning The Kid Stays in the Picture took liberties with both the documentary and biographical forms, with remarkable results. Too bad he didn’t use his talents to better tame the chaotic events of 1968.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate