Books: Opting In: Having a Child Without Losing Yourself

A review of Amy Richards’ book on child care, fertility, and the mommy wars

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Amy Richards’ book draws its title from a much-discussed and much-dissed 2003 New York Times Magazine story about highly educated women “opting out” of the workforce to raise their kids. But Opting In goes beyond rebutting that flawed article. Instead, it seeks to bridge the perceived divide between feminism and motherhood. Employing an engaging mix of cultural analysis, personal anecdotes, and interviews, Richards tackles hot-button topics including fertility, childbirth, men’s role in parenting, and women’s relationships with their mothers.

Richards, the coauthor of the third-wave-feminist call-to-arms Manifesta and the parent of two kids, describes her struggles with common conundrums like reconciling professional ambition and family obligations, and picking the “right” way to give birth. She opts for self-employment, which allows her to work flexible hours at home and share child-care shifts with her partner, and chooses to have an unmedicated birth in a hospital. She’s refreshingly honest about her choices without oversharing—no small feat in the tell-all era. She’s also candid about the missteps and inconsistencies that color perceptions of feminism, such as how efforts to liberate women from biological inequalities have led to the unwitting marginalization of mothers.

Richards’ aim to “minimize the disconnect between what one believes and how one lives” has a distinct echo of the second-wave mantra “the personal is political.” But her call for not “losing yourself ” can be frustrating in its fuzzy, feel-good focus on the individual. Unsurprisingly, Opting In—like most of the recent dispatches from the so-called mommy wars—is focused primarily on the plight and power of middle-class women.

Yet Richards still makes a convincing case for the necessity of living our politics if we want to see change. That means going beyond lamenting the unequal division of household work, or lobbying for better maternity- and paternity-leave benefits: We need to renegotiate our domestic relationships and unapologetically use every last minute of that parental leave. This isn’t a revolutionary concept, but it’s still welcome advice.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate