Film Review: Up the Yangtze

Filmmaker Yang Chung documents the new China below deck on a Yangtze River cruise ship full of Americans.

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


In 2002, Canadian filmmaker Yung Chang hopped on a luxury cruise ship full of American tourists for a “farewell tour” of the Yangtze River. Chang’s immigrant grandfather had told him stories about the river, and he hoped to see it before it was changed forever by the Three Gorges Dam. But as he watched the old country slip beneath the waters, Chang also found an intriguing story of the new China below deck.

While his Western shipmates amuse themselves with songs like “It’s so easy to learn Chinesey,” Chang gets to know two of the boat’s many young employees. Chen Bo Yu (above), a handsome 19-year-old porter, is one of China’s millions of only-child “little emperors” and a rabid convert to capitalism. The ship’s manager gives Chen and the rest of the staff regular lessons on how to accommodate guests (don’t call them “old, pale, or fat”). But after finding out that elderly passengers are stingy tippers, Chen refuses to serve them. “What the fuck am I going to do with two yuan?” he asks. Representing the flip side of progress is Yu Shui, a homesick 16-year-old dishwasher who can hardly bring herself to unclog the sink without crying. She has to work to support her illiterate peasant parents and two younger siblings, who are being relocated, yet again, because of the rising Yangtze reservoir.

Up the Yangtze, which airs on pbs‘s POV on October 8, is interspersed with cinematographer Wang Shi Qing’s lush vistas of the river and eerie shots of “ghost towns,” like the one Yu has left behind, waiting to be submerged. Though the film ends on a dispirited note, Chang’s journey has a happier-than-expected ending: He’s set up a fund that’s raised $20,000 for Yu and her family. Since the film, she’s jumped ship and gone back to school.

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate