Her History Books Ignored Zimbabwe’s Genocide. Her Debut Novel Hinges on It.

“I don’t know how my family will react,” says Novuyo Rosa Tshuma.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Novuyo Rosa Tshuma describes the mood, after Zimbabwe won its independence from Britain in 1980, as a “release of breaths long held.” But that optimism gave way to a reign of terror. From 1983 through 1987, an estimated 20,000 civilians were killed by forces loyal to Prime Minister Robert Mugabe in what became known as Gukurahundi, or “the early rain which washes away the chaff.” The atrocities were excluded from the nation’s history books—Tshuma’s own family couldn’t bear to speak of them. Now, she says, “it’s become this thing that I cannot get out of my head.”

Tshuma grew up in Matabeleland, where much of the violence took place, and eventually made her way to the United States, where she was accepted to the prestigious Iowa Writers’ Workshop. Her stunning new debut novel, House of Stone, wrestles with the legacy of Gukurahundi and its place in the national consciousness. “At home, I would have become aware of the potential dangers of what I was doing—the limits on what we are able to discuss and how,” she says. “In Iowa, I just thought, ‘Let me keep this as fiction and see what happens.’”

Mother Jones: Where did things stand in Matabeleland as you were growing up?

Novuyo Tshuma: I was born just a year after the Unity Accord to end the genocide. That trauma manifested itself through our parents, who had a lot of hostility toward the Shona people. But the genocide, I never heard stories about it from my own family. My mom won’t talk about it. Growing up, if you’d say something political you’d get a whack on the shoulder, but no one would tell you why you couldn’t speak about these things. It was associated with trouble and danger. I didn’t tell my mom what the book was about. She hasn’t read it yet, and I’m really nervous. I’m not sure how my family will react.

MJ: What was it like exploring different versions of your country’s past?

NT: History is a very personal thing. Everyone has an agenda: the Shona, the Ndebele, ex-Rhodesians. It was fascinating to see the different viewpoints. Many people left the country after independence because they were scared it would become Marxist—many grew up not knowing anything about that time, except that it was horrible.

MJ: You tell your story through Zamani, a character who is not always likable.

NT: It was too easy to have an innocent character—a victim of oppression. But some of the things that make him hard to like are just a response to hardship. After independence, corruption became normalized. To get food, you had to go to the black market. You had to smuggle goods from Botswana or South Africa. You would sell extra rice to your neighbors and friends at exorbitant prices. Everyone did that. But Zamani is also funny. I had fun crafting his wit and his maybe not-so-funny jokes. That’s also part of my experience of home: laughter in response to hardship. Zamani embodies the best and the worst of Zimbabwe. We have been victims, but we have also been complicit.

MJ: Mugabe plays only a minor role in the book. How come?

NT: He’s boring. He’s a megalomaniac. I didn’t want to waste too many pages on him. We’ve always been told it’s the kingmakers who should feature most prominently in our history, but we also make our history.

MJ: Are you worried about backlash?

NT: Some people have said I should be. There was a documentary of the genocide, and the CIO, our version of the CIA, was all over the guy who made it. But maybe our government doesn’t care as much about fiction. I don’t know. I tried to get a Zimbabwean publisher and I couldn’t because they were worried they could get sued.

MJ: When did you know you wanted to be a writer?

NT: I was a bookworm. My mother was a teacher, my father a lawyer, so I come from a family that encourages reading. As a child I constantly got books for presents. At school, we had the Hardy Boys, Nancy Drew—all those American picture stories. I became conscious of being an African writer when I was 19, when I saw Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie on BBC’S Hardtalk Extra. I thought, “Oh, here’s an African woman who is writing.” That made me believe I could pursue writing as a career. I sent her fan mail, and I begged her to send me Half of a Yellow Sun. She actually sent it! It was signed, “To Novuyo, with the hope that you’ll keep reading and writing.” That gesture felt really big to me.

MJ: What was it like to write this book in the United States?

NT: Very emotional! I felt like I was writing the book of my life. At the Iowa Writer’s Workshop, I was in a bubble, surrounded with fellow writers who encouraged me. Being so far away from home was a relief. I don’t think I could have written the character of Black Jesus the way he is written had I been home.

MJ: Do you see parallels between Zimbabwe and the United States?

NT: Trump feels like the perfect cliché African dictator. But there are differences. There have been massive demonstrations against Trump. Here you have the ability to openly discuss and satirize, show your distaste for the president. That’s something we’re lacking in Zimbabwe. When I was in London, my friend told me there was going to be a protest against Trump. I said, “Thank you so much for letting me know, I’ll stay away.” But they were actually inviting me! At home, if you’re told that there’s a march, you know it’s a warning to stay away, because things get violent.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate