Heroes of the 2010s: “Silicon Valley”

The show, not the place, you monsters.

Silicon Vallery tv show

Ali Paige Goldstein/HBO

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The staff of Mother Jones is rounding up the decade’s heroes and monsters. Find them all here.

Living in the Bay Area is a mind fuck. To live here, you have to find a way to laugh in order to keep from crying.

Enter HBO’s Silicon Valley

The sitcom, which premiered in 2014, channeled the absurdity of tech culture to tell the story of a motley crew of socially-awkward developers who want to change the world (obviously). The gang is driven by a blind, Zuckerbergian ambition to channel their passion for coding to create a revolutionary idea out of thin air while their company, Pied Piper, encounters the familiar pains of growing too big too quickly with venture capital money flowing all over the place. 

Kara Swisher, who has guest-starred on the show, recently got to the heart of a consistent theme not just in Silicon Valley but also the real Silicon Valley, in a column for the New York Times

The real problem, which was perfectly depicted on Silicon Valley, is that thoughtlessness is a feature, lack of reflection is a feature, a drive to grow at all costs is a feature and, most of all, the sloppy and lazy ways in which tech too often designs and deploys its inventions are the ultimate features.

What made the show compelling is its profound research and thoughtfulness about the most ridiculous aspects of the tech industry. It’s fitting that Veep, the political satire led by the incomparable Julia-Louis Dreyfuss, ran nearly parallel with Mike Judge’s Silicon Valley, two shows that gave us deeper insight into consequential yet comical worlds. Just as Veep upbraided Beltway ambition, Silicon Valley pokes fun at the outsized desires of the tech elite and offers a measure of hope for the gullible geniuses like Pied Piper‘s founder Richard Hendricks who want to make the world a better place.

And yet, it’s clear that even Hendricks could follow the path of a Mark Zuckerberg when he goes before Congress to make the case that his company would defy what other companies do and refuse to mine data, even though, he later finds out, they’ve been mining user data all along. It’s perfect that his nemesis, Gavin Belson, is a composite of tech billionaires. Silicon Valley, the show, thrived on the contradiction between an authentic belief of changing the world and just making money, just like the Patagonia vest-wearing tech bros who amble along Market Street do.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate