Where the Sun Don’t Shine

The Bush administration seems to operate on a need-to-know basis. They’ve got the information, so the public doesn’t need to know — about Iraqi wmd, the national energy plan, the 9/11 intelligence failings, the list goes on. Indeed, it’s the policy of the Ashcroft Justice Department to stymie every Freedom of Information Act request that comes in. But the tight lid on information extends well beyond sensitive intelligence into routine matters of public policy. Herewith: a survey of news the Bush administration didn’t want you to know.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Bush administration seems to operate on a need-to-know basis. They’ve got the information, so the public doesn’t need to know — about Iraqi wmd, the national energy plan, the 9/11 intelligence failings, the list goes on. Indeed, it’s the policy of the Ashcroft Justice Department to stymie every Freedom of Information Act request that comes in. But the tight lid on information extends well beyond sensitive intelligence into routine matters of public policy. Herewith: a survey of news the Bush administration didn’t want you to know.

THE BAD NEWS THE BUSH REACTION THE FALLOUT…
From the time Bush took office through November 2002, there were 39,266 mass layoffs, involving more than 4.9 million jobs. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ mass-layoff tracking was killed on Christmas Eve, 2002. Although Democrats eventually restored funding for the study in February 2003, 6,148 additional mass layoffs, involving 614,167 jobs, went unannounced.
In April 2002, the EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances was about to issue a public warning that Zonolite insulation — produced from vermiculite mined in Libby, Montana — contains deadly asbestos fibers and may be found in as many as 35 million American homes. The finding was suppressed by the White House for more than a year. A senior EPA staffer told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, “It wasn’t that [the White House] ordered us not to make the declaration — they just really, really strongly suggested against it.” Senator Orrin Hatch has submitted legislation to end asbestos-related lawsuits, creating a $108 billion asbestos trust to compensate victims. An AFL-CIO spokesman called the bill “a vehicle to relieve businesses and insurers of hundreds of billions of dollars of liability while significantly shortchanging the asbestos victims.”
A 2002 Treasury study of unfunded Social Security and Medicare commitments projected a $44 trillion budget shortfall in perpetuity, which would require an immediate and permanent 66 percent income-tax hike to fix. Originally slated to appear in Bush’s February 2003 budget, the study was shelved after Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill was ousted. The Financial Times reported news of the study one day after Bush signed his latest $350 billion tax cut into law in May. Taken together, the two Bush tax cuts will produce 17 percent of the projected shortfall.
The EPA Office of Children’s Health Protection concluded in May 2002 that 8 percent of childbearing-age women have elevated blood levels of mercury — a neurotoxin that can cause developmental deficits in their kids. The main culprit? Smokestack emissions. The EPA data were suppressed by the White House Office of Management and Budget for nine months; the findings were leaked to the Wall Street Journal in February 2003. During the news blackout, in July 2002 the administration introduced its “Clear Skies” initiative, which would give most polluters 15 years to curtail mercury emissions, while allowing some of the dirtiest plants to pay for the right to pollute.
An EPA state-of-the-environment report slated for release in June said that global warming is real and is caused by human industrial activity and auto pollution. The White House edited the document, eliminating links between global warming and smokestack and tailpipe emissions. It also substituted climate research financed in part by the American Petroleum Institute. Rather than publish compromised data, the EPA dropped the climate-change section altogether. “Political staff are becoming increasingly bold in forcing agency officials to endorse junk science,” said Jeremy Symons, a climate policy expert at the National Wildlife Federation. “This is like the White House directing the secretary of Labor to alter unemployment data to paint a rosy economic picture.”


AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate