More Right Turns Ahead

Political analyst Walter Russell Mead argues that no matter what Clinton and the Democrats decide to do, their running room is limited.


On the GOP: “We’re seeing a basic realignment. 1994 wasn’t a fluke. We’re moving toward Republicans dominating both houses of Congress and winning most presidential elections. The white South is voting Republican as a bloc — and there are still more Democratic seats to lose there. However, if the Republicans keep getting pulled toward the social right, they run the risk of being pulled out of the mainstream. The Northern soccer mom won’t vote for the party of Jesse Helms. But if moderate Republicans win, or Southern conservatives show restraint, the party could develop an electoral lock.”

On the Clinton scandals: “When I lived in Louisiana, we used to read these picaresque stories of corruption; we never believed the opposition was any better. For the public to care about scandals, there has to be some much more serious stuff. Watergate was part of an organized criminal conspiracy to steal the 1972 election. The Clinton stuff looks like ordinary political graft. There are Clinton haters, and they’re going to investigate. But if Republican partisans knock Clinton off, they entrench Gore as the incumbent. If I were a Republican strategist, I would tell them to leave him wounded but in office.”

On public apathy: “As the population grows and the country becomes more diverse, people feel more alienated from government. Look, in some places, if you register to vote, you’re more likely to be summoned for jury duty, which is essentially a poll tax of two weeks of labor. For taxi drivers, it’s a death sentence. Some people say declining turnout is a reflection only of alienation and anger. Suppose it’s an expression of contentment? Things aren’t that terrible, there’s no difference between the parties, why get involved in this crap? It’s not an irrational response.”

Walter Russell Mead is the author of Mortal Splendor: The American Empire in Transition. Interview by Evan Smithi.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.