Editor’s Note

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As of March 31, 1997, this is how Science and the Environment‘s “summary” of an article from the September 1996 issue of Discover read (including the typos). S&E has since revised the page on their site.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin. Aims for Longer-Range Forecasts

Science and the Environment – http://www.voyagepub.com/publish – Voyage Publishing 1996


Long-range forecasting is the goal of many an atmospheric scientist, including those employed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

“NOAA is trying to develop the capability of predicting climate on longer time scales — a season ahead, or a year ahead, rather than three days ahead,” says atmospheric scientist Donald Hansen of the University of Miami. “And the generally accepted belief is that the longer-term variations in climate are influenced very strongly not just by the atmosphere but by the temperature structure in the ocean.” [see article on El Nino].

In search of clues to help explain long-term climate patterns, Hansen and his NOAA colleague Hugo Bezdek have recently poured over 45 years’ worth of North Atlantic sea surface temperature records, from 1948 to 1992.

Unfortunately, they didn’t find out how to predict the climate a year in advance. But they did uncover some strange ocean phenomena that, so far, defy conventional explanation: “huge blobs of warm and cool water slowly roaming around the North Atlantic.” The patches were immense — typically 500 to 600 miles across — but were nevertheless hard to spot. Hansen and Bezdek found them only because faced with so much data, they were forced to simplify their task. “We looked particularly at the most extreme things that occurred — the anomalies, only the top 10 and bottom 10 percent of sea surface temperatures,” said Hansen. Since they were only interested in long-term variations in temperature, they filtered out any temperature fluctuations that occurred over less than 4 years. Hidden in those 45 years of temperature records was the existence of large cold and warm “blobs” of water — one or two degrees colder or warmer than the surrounding seas — that sprang up in in the North Atlantic at various times, and that roughly followed general ocean current patterns — counterclockwise in the northern Atlantic, clockwise farther south. AMong the puzzling aspects of these records is their speed: about a mile per day,just 1/3 or 1/4 the speed of precailing currents.

“The water is probably flowing through them and changing its temperature as it goes,” says Hansen.

Hansen and Bezdek also don’t know how the blobs form or why they last so long, though Hansen says there must be some long-lasting interaction between the atmosphere and the sea that the blobs influence climate . though they note that one warm blob coincided with a prolonged drought in Scandanavia in the lat 1950s. While future research might answer these questions, for now much about the blobs remains a mystery. — Discover, September 1996


Return to Chapter


Back to “Pirate Publishing

See the Original (In the “Oceans” Section) | Check out S&E‘s Recent Revision

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate